View other reviews for this product:
Bernard Ancèze
Published on 08/08/07 at 23:50
See the reviews previous ones.
48V on two tracks.
Ergonomics and the logic of the menus are good. Pramplis of the trs are clear enough with a gain trs. The pramplis output are in the middle of what is being done on consoles gnral. The converter is excellent for this range. The connection is complte.
UTILIZATION
My studio uses:
work composed the guitar or piano / vocals.
RPTES the work: one or two microphones.
work on implementation: re-recording.
record acoustic models (1 5 instruments) and master mixes itself trs.
couraging me even my CD.
My scne uses:
sound with guitar / vocals upstream of the amplifier or console.
We can therefore make its compression, the noise gate, EQ and reverb sound like a good sound-ing for you and send it on its little amp for a small room (or a big, well, come on).
The range of effects is complte and well organized, chorus / reverb / delay, 5 compressor, noise gate, expander, Doubling, desseur, EQ, etc. ... effects are essential, chorus / reverb / delay, five compressors, noise gate, expander, trs are suitable. The pre-sets are penss overall. They have to be raliss by ingnieurs sound familiar with the job, because there gure change to raise standards for use, and the guys pr seen quite a complte line of standards. All changes are possible characters if you want CRER its own pr-sets and mmoriser associated or not struggling, everything is very practical and not too many labyrinths of menus and submenus . The beginning is enjoyable to meet pre-sets Intgr and most find little prs confirm everything he needs to work quickly and well. The organization of the routing: taken, re-recording, groups and subgroups, prmix, master, is also quite well-crafted and is a common practice, leaving his freedom in the maverick. There is no possible to insert his own use Lexicon or Avalon chri. Obviously the machine is thought all-in-one mobile (it also works on batteries). There is no phase inverter. It's a bit bte, but not essential either, a small reverse-phase cable is something quite simple couraging self-same. There is no possibility of making pre-mix including the effects DIFFERENT inland simultanment must make as many reports as compression / eq. It's not dbile either, saves a pr-sets of groups and possibly edit them.
The limit of the machine is the two recording channels simultaneously, is not suitable for the batteries. It is Designed for the singer-guitarist (electric or acoustic). The singer-pianist found there too, and the acoustic taker lives. It is no more bulky than ordinary portable, more reliable, simpler, and especially better team. Etched very simple and quick plutt his CD on the BR itself. You can import sounds and sound files without difficulty.
SOUNDS
I have to go wavelab (my old version 3) + Tc-converter Electonic BMC2 to do better. Well, you still even a good enough monitoring to realize.
The sound? Ben would like, adpend of one who does. Frankly, the machine is not trs CHRE for what it does. I am struggling with the microphones and SRS that I know well, Neumann U87, U89, KM84, Km86, KMS85. a, that's what makes all the microphones. Pramps SPL gain-station. On BR, a little reverb and compression, a sound dj. I couraging my CDs and those of some friends intruments 4 or 5 max. I'm not going to pro studios. Or the guys will be taken in the mastering studio real team. I've had good returns.
OVERALL OPINION
In three years I went from 864 to BR 900CD.
The more lightweight, strong, mobile.
The least-seen = no nitre prcis, big bars that rise and decendent. To do the ear.
Quality / price = excellent.
There may be better, but I know the hergonomie BR. And I think it is better that using a tool familiar, plustt a crazy thing we do not know how to walk.
48V on two tracks.
Ergonomics and the logic of the menus are good. Pramplis of the trs are clear enough with a gain trs. The pramplis output are in the middle of what is being done on consoles gnral. The converter is excellent for this range. The connection is complte.
UTILIZATION
My studio uses:
work composed the guitar or piano / vocals.
RPTES the work: one or two microphones.
work on implementation: re-recording.
record acoustic models (1 5 instruments) and master mixes itself trs.
couraging me even my CD.
My scne uses:
sound with guitar / vocals upstream of the amplifier or console.
We can therefore make its compression, the noise gate, EQ and reverb sound like a good sound-ing for you and send it on its little amp for a small room (or a big, well, come on).
The range of effects is complte and well organized, chorus / reverb / delay, 5 compressor, noise gate, expander, Doubling, desseur, EQ, etc. ... effects are essential, chorus / reverb / delay, five compressors, noise gate, expander, trs are suitable. The pre-sets are penss overall. They have to be raliss by ingnieurs sound familiar with the job, because there gure change to raise standards for use, and the guys pr seen quite a complte line of standards. All changes are possible characters if you want CRER its own pr-sets and mmoriser associated or not struggling, everything is very practical and not too many labyrinths of menus and submenus . The beginning is enjoyable to meet pre-sets Intgr and most find little prs confirm everything he needs to work quickly and well. The organization of the routing: taken, re-recording, groups and subgroups, prmix, master, is also quite well-crafted and is a common practice, leaving his freedom in the maverick. There is no possible to insert his own use Lexicon or Avalon chri. Obviously the machine is thought all-in-one mobile (it also works on batteries). There is no phase inverter. It's a bit bte, but not essential either, a small reverse-phase cable is something quite simple couraging self-same. There is no possibility of making pre-mix including the effects DIFFERENT inland simultanment must make as many reports as compression / eq. It's not dbile either, saves a pr-sets of groups and possibly edit them.
The limit of the machine is the two recording channels simultaneously, is not suitable for the batteries. It is Designed for the singer-guitarist (electric or acoustic). The singer-pianist found there too, and the acoustic taker lives. It is no more bulky than ordinary portable, more reliable, simpler, and especially better team. Etched very simple and quick plutt his CD on the BR itself. You can import sounds and sound files without difficulty.
SOUNDS
I have to go wavelab (my old version 3) + Tc-converter Electonic BMC2 to do better. Well, you still even a good enough monitoring to realize.
The sound? Ben would like, adpend of one who does. Frankly, the machine is not trs CHRE for what it does. I am struggling with the microphones and SRS that I know well, Neumann U87, U89, KM84, Km86, KMS85. a, that's what makes all the microphones. Pramps SPL gain-station. On BR, a little reverb and compression, a sound dj. I couraging my CDs and those of some friends intruments 4 or 5 max. I'm not going to pro studios. Or the guys will be taken in the mastering studio real team. I've had good returns.
OVERALL OPINION
In three years I went from 864 to BR 900CD.
The more lightweight, strong, mobile.
The least-seen = no nitre prcis, big bars that rise and decendent. To do the ear.
Quality / price = excellent.
There may be better, but I know the hergonomie BR. And I think it is better that using a tool familiar, plustt a crazy thing we do not know how to walk.