Scatophily
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 07/27/05 at 10:39
It is a micro for scne.
I do not know its technical specifications, but it's easy to find on the net (if you understand!)
OVERALL OPINION
TRS is a good microphone.
Given the level (output volume) is infrieur that of SM58, but the quality of the rendering of timbre is its main asset. You just make sure to keep enough prs of the mouth because the ds that moves away somewhat diminishes the return trs fast compared to other microphones.
It's a habit to take!
I used a Sennheiser 835th before, and I do not shut completely satisfied. I had the opportunity to use an SM58 and then I have the Shure 565SD Discoveries with my singing teacher, and I adopted him.
The concern is that this little micro tends larserner more easily than 2 prcdemment deficits, but still reasonable. It manages a rglage adapted to the mixer.
The ratio quality price is interesting.
I recommend it for anyone as PRIOR ® religion restore the personality of the voice.
I do not know its technical specifications, but it's easy to find on the net (if you understand!)
OVERALL OPINION
TRS is a good microphone.
Given the level (output volume) is infrieur that of SM58, but the quality of the rendering of timbre is its main asset. You just make sure to keep enough prs of the mouth because the ds that moves away somewhat diminishes the return trs fast compared to other microphones.
It's a habit to take!
I used a Sennheiser 835th before, and I do not shut completely satisfied. I had the opportunity to use an SM58 and then I have the Shure 565SD Discoveries with my singing teacher, and I adopted him.
The concern is that this little micro tends larserner more easily than 2 prcdemment deficits, but still reasonable. It manages a rglage adapted to the mixer.
The ratio quality price is interesting.
I recommend it for anyone as PRIOR ® religion restore the personality of the voice.