Filter
Our members also liked:
4.6/5(27 reviews)
70 %
15 %
4 %
4 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
- musicalokitePublished on 04/21/08 at 12:33 (This content has been automatically translated from French)For szene
NOTICE GLOBAL
I do not use it, I do not sing, but they use it,
and they seem happy ...
00 - AnonymousPublished on 06/29/09 at 09:20 (This content has been automatically translated from French)What type of microphone? (Voice, sound, mixed ..)
supercardioid dynamic vocal microphone directivity
What technology? (Electret, condenser ...)
NOTICE GLOBAL
How long have you use it?
I rather uses an AKG D5 because it is more effective in addressing feedback. It's been 2 years since I use D5 especially repetition.
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
D5 of bnficie to a recent technology as saying that the SM58 and Beta 58 t designed them there 40 and 20 years.
D5 is as hot as the DM and the Beta but possde more nuances than the DM or even a same range of Sennheiser. The most effective rpter styles in rock / hard / metal is D5. On stage an old SM will…Read moreWhat type of microphone? (Voice, sound, mixed ..)
supercardioid dynamic vocal microphone directivity
What technology? (Electret, condenser ...)
NOTICE GLOBAL
How long have you use it?
I rather uses an AKG D5 because it is more effective in addressing feedback. It's been 2 years since I use D5 especially repetition.
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
D5 of bnficie to a recent technology as saying that the SM58 and Beta 58 t designed them there 40 and 20 years.
D5 is as hot as the DM and the Beta but possde more nuances than the DM or even a same range of Sennheiser. The most effective rpter styles in rock / hard / metal is D5. On stage an old SM will give you more a vintage sound and D5 more definition (rcente technology requires)
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
How do you report qualitprix?
D5 score a bit cheaper than the SM and 2 times cheaper than the Beta 58. possde a Suprieure robustness to Shure at the grid. This is the best report qualitprix between 70 and 200euros currently supercardioid dynamic microphone
With experience, you do again this choice? ...dropoff Window
I do not regrte to have purchased after having tried the famous legend of microphones which are more expensive and are a little obsoltes ct D5. To record in a studio condenser microphone is prcis (eg a AKG C5), but for rpter forget this possibility (question of sensitivity)
I will put in 8/10 and 9/10 Beta 58 D5. 7/10 SM 58 and Sennheiser. For a rock / hard / metal style.See less00 - Ben_eggmen
Very good
Published on 09/23/14 at 06:52 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Micro Dynamics
OVERALL OPINION
Used for a few months.
Much more clearly than the sm58, great presence, sort of a mix very easily.
Very insensitive to feedback.
Excellent choice50 - dutch68
great micro
Published on 11/27/13 at 09:18 (This content has been automatically translated from French)a shure beta 58 A used for voice and guitar solo singing voice.
OVERALL OPINION
This year I did some singing with my guitar solo or group.
I have an SM58 and SM55 a (skull), A beta 58 is largely over.
I do not regret my purchase is ideal for vocals.
comment says to be smack bang in the face. of course if you put aside you will not hear much. I play mostly glen Hansard and radiohead sound is very clear and distinct in both acute and severe.
more than twenty centimeter captures you well ... I advise are buying!!!!!100 - heybulldog
the best microphone for voice medium
Published on 02/04/13 at 05:36 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hyper cardioid dynamic microphone
OVERALL OPINION
It's been 20 years since I used to repeat to me and also for my solo performances.
He dropped the last week after 20 years of good service after a small réparartion 10 years ago, without any special care (stored directly in the bag of cables, fell several times) and I'll buy a dice this week. (A beta 58A of the coup as the normal 58 no longer exists)
Noise manipulations are incredibly reduced!
With my group and repeats on stage we have sm58 which are much less effective on a voice like mine that does not shine by its round bass.
Compared to the SM 58, the beta 58 also has a better resistance to feedback.
I think there…Read moreHyper cardioid dynamic microphone
OVERALL OPINION
It's been 20 years since I used to repeat to me and also for my solo performances.
He dropped the last week after 20 years of good service after a small réparartion 10 years ago, without any special care (stored directly in the bag of cables, fell several times) and I'll buy a dice this week. (A beta 58A of the coup as the normal 58 no longer exists)
Noise manipulations are incredibly reduced!
With my group and repeats on stage we have sm58 which are much less effective on a voice like mine that does not shine by its round bass.
Compared to the SM 58, the beta 58 also has a better resistance to feedback.
I think there is no better on stage for voices like mine (a guy's voice but not Barry White lol) or a girl's voice.
(Waiting for my new BETA58 I sing with my sm57 and I'm miserable!)See less101 - BeyondR
Great for Live Performances.
Published on 09/12/12 at 08:45Shure Beta 58A Supercardioid Dynamic Microphone is a live and recording mic.
It uses a condenser dynamic technology.
OVERALL OPINION
Shure Beta 58A Supercardioid Dynamic Microphone is great for a small studio and for live performances, it provides a deep quality of the incoming signal and it sounds decent on the entire range.
Shure Beta 58A Supercardioid Dynamic Microphone is a cheap microphone that still provides a more natural sound, it has a wider frequency response, and it's quite heavier because of it's material.
What I like most about it is the great price and quality that Shure managed to give for us, I also enjoy the neodymium magnet that produces a stronger electric …Read moreShure Beta 58A Supercardioid Dynamic Microphone is a live and recording mic.
It uses a condenser dynamic technology.
OVERALL OPINION
Shure Beta 58A Supercardioid Dynamic Microphone is great for a small studio and for live performances, it provides a deep quality of the incoming signal and it sounds decent on the entire range.
Shure Beta 58A Supercardioid Dynamic Microphone is a cheap microphone that still provides a more natural sound, it has a wider frequency response, and it's quite heavier because of it's material.
What I like most about it is the great price and quality that Shure managed to give for us, I also enjoy the neodymium magnet that produces a stronger electric current for hotter output voltage for higher frequency sensitivity.
It has a frequency response of 50 Hz to 16 kHz so it basically captures all the pitch changes and phrases.
Another great thing about this mic is the Supercardioid capsule that makes the recording process to take place much much faster because after the recording you basically have the vocals quite in place and you don't need some crazy mastering and eq.
As I mentioned, my opinion about the value of price is great, it costs around 200 $ and it comes with a soft storage pouch and a mic clip that is adjustable to 180 degrees.
Precision and quality of the sounds is good, you can ever record yourself at a very close distance and still get a pretty sounds without any kind of distortion or any kind of interferences.
I've tried several dynamic mic and I gotta admit for only 200$ I don't think you can get any better deal than this, the mic doesn't feel cheap, it's made of some heavy material, it provides a deep frequency response, so it's basically a very good product at a low price.
See less00 - funkypopol
Good microphone (too?) Directive
Published on 05/27/12 at 01:37 (This content has been automatically translated from French)see specifications above +
OVERALL OPINION
Good mic, probably better than the SM58 his side, but I think this mic is not recommended for musicians-singers (or singers on the move), as too prescriptive. I sing while playing the piano, and I have to constantly be careful not to deviate too much my mouth to the microphone, which is a bit painful and destabilizing.
That is why I returned to my old SM58, although less precise but more off-road.95 - ArnaudMercury
Great!
Published on 03/22/12 at 05:11 (This content has been automatically translated from French)See previous reviews for caractéristiqes
OVERALL OPINION
I, unwanted past year.
I had already tried an SM 58 (and 48)
+: Clate, sound color. It sends more power than the SM58.
-: Uh ... there is surment but I see it too (if the price can always baissser but respectable)
Pretty good value for money
I refferai this choice62 - honey33
disgusted ...
Published on 02/19/12 at 01:52 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Vocal Mic.
OVERALL OPINION
I have not sung for a long time since I repeated two months with the cell and dropped me, so trash.
It seems that I have no chance because they are renowned for strength.
This does not prevent my disappointment with this microphone.
Against by the snooze room is equipped with SM58 and BETA was above moot.
It's a shame they're so expensive.
My overall opinion is mixed, or indeed the time my mic was working, it was very good but suddenly I have a big doubt about the strength.
PS: I do not think the fault is my fault because I am extremely careful with my stuff.17 - LsanPublished on 07/24/03 at 17:24 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Well, sm58 dynamic mic's successor, for taking votes ...
OVERALL OPINION
I have been using something like micro main voice for home recording, APRS having a dynamic and a static ... pif
my static silent so sensitive that I tankards all ambient noise, car engines, slamming doors, birds in the yard ... c'tait a micro trs more neutral, crystalline, irrprochable except that He was too sensitive ... so I look for a DCID dynamic trs good quality recordings for my homestudio with the desire to have something with more color m confidence vis vis the mark as it is DCRI (both quotes and REFERENCE) for situations together and no more ...
short, I test bulk beyer (tgx40, T88 I know the e…Read moreWell, sm58 dynamic mic's successor, for taking votes ...
OVERALL OPINION
I have been using something like micro main voice for home recording, APRS having a dynamic and a static ... pif
my static silent so sensitive that I tankards all ambient noise, car engines, slamming doors, birds in the yard ... c'tait a micro trs more neutral, crystalline, irrprochable except that He was too sensitive ... so I look for a DCID dynamic trs good quality recordings for my homestudio with the desire to have something with more color m confidence vis vis the mark as it is DCRI (both quotes and REFERENCE) for situations together and no more ...
short, I test bulk beyer (tgx40, T88 I know the exact MODEL), the akg (d3800), the Sennheiser (E855 and e865 - electret it), an Audio Technica electret, for shure (sm 57 and 58, 57 and thus the beta 58). good, if I had the money, I would have a test or a neumann akg C414 Thiers, but I also chopp birds ...
I ultimately chose the Beta 58A, APRS having a first depth test with the Sennheiser e865 which had the particularity to have the same default as my static in terms of rendering (background noise) , finesse and less noise (c'tait even rude, hello ... the proximity of DGAT from the sm58, it has the same round in the mids (clear color but c ' is what I was looking), and brightness in the treble flateuse and more ... at least the SM did not really sharp ... in terms of proximity is not a attnu not pollute too low even if the cut is ncessaire ...
short, I put 10 because it suits me perfectly ... then all of MRIT be essay based on the votes of each grain ... I know in any case that German brands because I do not like a proximity effect too pronounced (for dynamic, but I did not test static) ...
Note that I did a test with the Quickly making a scratching sound, and I think with a little research investment we can get something right ... trsSee less10 - Pete_shifterPublished on 02/21/05 at 00:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Breaking the bank! For 50 euros more, forget the SM and buy the Beta.
If only for the output level suprieur.
To test urgently scratches on amp with distortion. If you want to bite, it is a radical tool. Better than the Beyer M88, which is almost double (pt I like an idiot and I replaced the BETA58).
OVERALL OPINION
I do not share with them but if you want to touch 150 euros, I recommend JVV Audio Partners. J'achte all my stuff at home for years because they have great prices.
For comparison: in Thomann.de is 169 euros and 155 euros Playback.fr.Read moreBreaking the bank! For 50 euros more, forget the SM and buy the Beta.
If only for the output level suprieur.
To test urgently scratches on amp with distortion. If you want to bite, it is a radical tool. Better than the Beyer M88, which is almost double (pt I like an idiot and I replaced the BETA58).
OVERALL OPINION
I do not share with them but if you want to touch 150 euros, I recommend JVV Audio Partners. J'achte all my stuff at home for years because they have great prices.
For comparison: in Thomann.de is 169 euros and 155 euros Playback.fr.See less00 - benjamin55Published on 04/11/05 at 07:24 (This content has been automatically translated from French)It replaces the sm58 and replace it!
OVERALL OPINION
I used shure first prizes (PG SERIES) and after a few days I could not go, I had a real quality microphone which could be suitable for both scne for my home- studio. Rsultat I bought the beta 58A and I am delighted. It is great and with good prampli a little work in the investment for the sound recording and mixing is a small gnial. I also use it with an Alesis midiverb4 home and your exact perfect. This gives me a fantastic atmosphere and I even found the atmosphere of Radiohead's lives.00 - sambalecPublished on 02/18/06 at 08:15 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Very pro
OVERALL OPINION
It's a killer, there's nothing to say!!30 - MichalonPublished on 07/06/06 at 02:06 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Micro chant, also versatile (guitar amp, for example).
The sound: very nice color, warm and clear both .. easy to record and mix.
Good potato before feedback feedback.
OVERALL OPINION
BETA58 I use for over 10 years.
My favorite: a very nice grain. Sometimes advantageously replaces a static on some votes.
Quality / price ratio great for professional equipment.
I have redone this choice: I bought another one!20 - dole73Published on 08/07/07 at 12:02 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Plutt dynamic microphone intended to be sung, I use it for my vocal takes.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for several months. I have known in the radio station where I work. This microphone is cheap and it allows (with dbx 286a) to the trs good job. I use it to record my chronicles home is nickel.
I like it because it is trs end, it is sturdy and I like its look. The ratio quality price is right. If you hsitez between a sm58 and a beta 58, take the beta for a few euros more.
Yes, I would do this choice willingly.
I could test rcemment other microphones (beta 87a for example), my beta 58a and Exceeds all! What a joy this microphone! DBX 286a coupled one, I have a beautiful sound …Read morePlutt dynamic microphone intended to be sung, I use it for my vocal takes.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for several months. I have known in the radio station where I work. This microphone is cheap and it allows (with dbx 286a) to the trs good job. I use it to record my chronicles home is nickel.
I like it because it is trs end, it is sturdy and I like its look. The ratio quality price is right. If you hsitez between a sm58 and a beta 58, take the beta for a few euros more.
Yes, I would do this choice willingly.
I could test rcemment other microphones (beta 87a for example), my beta 58a and Exceeds all! What a joy this microphone! DBX 286a coupled one, I have a beautiful sound trs. It is, for now, the best microphone that I used.See less30
- 1
- 2