alcools
Note : 8 sur 10
Published on 05/31/07 at 09:40
Heart of any musician who bought his first real microphone!
OVERALL OPINION
I used 12 years, or rather should I say, I have long been used to the idea of trying something else.
Without making any detours, if you want a microphone for voice, do not take an SM58; It was a reference for a long time, but you have to evolve and at the same price, you become a Sennheiser E845 with its clear, precise with potato and with the advantages of being super cardioid (picks up a little less feedback because it captures very little sound from the sides). In addition, if you improvise a singer, it will help a little because it "smooth" a little tone of voice (he makes a little less "fat" - I do not know if I'm making myself clear here ... ). Finally, it gives you good acute (normal, the E845 up to 18kHz 16kHz against the SM58 memory).
I put 7 as the SM58 and respect because he is still not so bad, but frankly, we must stop buying that micro becaufe saw the same studio in the first repeated the corner.
OVERALL OPINION
I used 12 years, or rather should I say, I have long been used to the idea of trying something else.
Without making any detours, if you want a microphone for voice, do not take an SM58; It was a reference for a long time, but you have to evolve and at the same price, you become a Sennheiser E845 with its clear, precise with potato and with the advantages of being super cardioid (picks up a little less feedback because it captures very little sound from the sides). In addition, if you improvise a singer, it will help a little because it "smooth" a little tone of voice (he makes a little less "fat" - I do not know if I'm making myself clear here ... ). Finally, it gives you good acute (normal, the E845 up to 18kHz 16kHz against the SM58 memory).
I put 7 as the SM58 and respect because he is still not so bad, but frankly, we must stop buying that micro becaufe saw the same studio in the first repeated the corner.