View other reviews for this product:
RaphRaymond
Published on 02/09/07 at 02:09
I use it for about 6 months on my Ibanez MC300 Musician. A skyscraper in mahogany with a handle through Saddle.
With this microphone so I harmonics trs trs that take a long time (like many 25seconde, without cheating with Feedback ...), a full-well distortion of its kind mastoc cinderblock. Prcis with all frquences he ct an implacable, trs fair enough, sharp may be a little cold, a little dark. It sends it's all wood, but it does it well. He possde high dynamics and it is certainly possible to spend a clean crunch well saturated with just the shade to mdiator, note however, if the tone volume is satisfactory, there is almost no diffrence between a stamp that could be her sweet trs crmeux its strong and it could be more slamming, it happens all the time its just the same crmeux. It is not great in fact alive.
For large rhythmic rock, hard and mtal is nickel. I wanted a microwave with a lot of potatoes in distortion and trs prcis is Winning Good I realize now that I prfrer sound a bit more rock'n'roll , a little singing, a little more inspiring than this block, l but these are my tastes, I have the wrong microphone.
It gives a nice clean plutt in single, not funky but quite harmonious. Kind of quiet and nice, there is some nuance in the tone, but it's still a. Double acute lack of it on my guitar and it is obvious for someone like me who deuxime his guitar is a Start. I am forced to compromise with my amp if I want to keep the attack and the prsence tonezone stratum without being too garish carrment during the same concert.
Well it's a good mic for large distortion that not all slime which is hard rock and mtal to sound a little lightweight is better to take something else.
It's a good mic so I could have 10. I do not like it then I could have 4 ... I put 7 / 10 because in absolute terms it is doing its job as well prcise rhythm heavy for me even if it lacks sharp and feeling and so versatile.
It might be better on a guitar with wood more acute ... As I had Norton a run I'm the change and found a sound that is much closer to what I wanted. These two pickups are similar not bad, but Norton is a bit more singing, almost funky as a single and more connections with my Start. So I put my neck tone area (yes I know strange) and whether duplicate this position is too powerful carrment it offers a single crmeux his wish and trs trs pr cis which is often the default position handle which tend to promote the sound drooling ... Good not bad but not great, I prferais the Norton ...
With this microphone so I harmonics trs trs that take a long time (like many 25seconde, without cheating with Feedback ...), a full-well distortion of its kind mastoc cinderblock. Prcis with all frquences he ct an implacable, trs fair enough, sharp may be a little cold, a little dark. It sends it's all wood, but it does it well. He possde high dynamics and it is certainly possible to spend a clean crunch well saturated with just the shade to mdiator, note however, if the tone volume is satisfactory, there is almost no diffrence between a stamp that could be her sweet trs crmeux its strong and it could be more slamming, it happens all the time its just the same crmeux. It is not great in fact alive.
For large rhythmic rock, hard and mtal is nickel. I wanted a microwave with a lot of potatoes in distortion and trs prcis is Winning Good I realize now that I prfrer sound a bit more rock'n'roll , a little singing, a little more inspiring than this block, l but these are my tastes, I have the wrong microphone.
It gives a nice clean plutt in single, not funky but quite harmonious. Kind of quiet and nice, there is some nuance in the tone, but it's still a. Double acute lack of it on my guitar and it is obvious for someone like me who deuxime his guitar is a Start. I am forced to compromise with my amp if I want to keep the attack and the prsence tonezone stratum without being too garish carrment during the same concert.
Well it's a good mic for large distortion that not all slime which is hard rock and mtal to sound a little lightweight is better to take something else.
It's a good mic so I could have 10. I do not like it then I could have 4 ... I put 7 / 10 because in absolute terms it is doing its job as well prcise rhythm heavy for me even if it lacks sharp and feeling and so versatile.
It might be better on a guitar with wood more acute ... As I had Norton a run I'm the change and found a sound that is much closer to what I wanted. These two pickups are similar not bad, but Norton is a bit more singing, almost funky as a single and more connections with my Start. So I put my neck tone area (yes I know strange) and whether duplicate this position is too powerful carrment it offers a single crmeux his wish and trs trs pr cis which is often the default position handle which tend to promote the sound drooling ... Good not bad but not great, I prferais the Norton ...