View other reviews for this product:
LPA94
Published on 03/26/10 at 15:34
Electrostatic condenser, cardioid. Rather sensitive.
OVERALL OPINION
It is now over 4 years, I had the opportunity to look at a bunch of microphone (SM57, AT4050, Dragonfly, ...). For the price is pretty good and it helps out well, used for the model or the live, but it stops there. In home professional studio I stopped using it for about a year: not accurate in the treble, falsely sweet (medium-high carved, acute narrow) and quite pervasive in the low-mids (say 500Hz).
For voice he asked numerous corrections: treatment of dynamic band EQ, dynamic re compression, reverb, etc. ...
Where it remains correct it before a guitar amp. I say correct because in comparison, the Dragonfly is just magic for that use!
For the same budget I will not repeat this microphone. I would go see the side of Rode, SE Electronics, Shure and T. Bone, for example.
OVERALL OPINION
It is now over 4 years, I had the opportunity to look at a bunch of microphone (SM57, AT4050, Dragonfly, ...). For the price is pretty good and it helps out well, used for the model or the live, but it stops there. In home professional studio I stopped using it for about a year: not accurate in the treble, falsely sweet (medium-high carved, acute narrow) and quite pervasive in the low-mids (say 500Hz).
For voice he asked numerous corrections: treatment of dynamic band EQ, dynamic re compression, reverb, etc. ...
Where it remains correct it before a guitar amp. I say correct because in comparison, the Dragonfly is just magic for that use!
For the same budget I will not repeat this microphone. I would go see the side of Rode, SE Electronics, Shure and T. Bone, for example.