All user reviews for the Pioneer CDJ-200

- How long have you use it?

for 2 weeks. APRS Virtual DJ 2 years I cracked ... CDJ 200 + DJM 400 X 2

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?

+ = Effects and Jet Wash. The robustness of the plates, the blue of zoli jog, loops prcises. Guilt with a DJM400 is the bomb! ^ ^

- = The jog is not empty but it did. It's better to start with 200 as can learn the basics of mix ...
(I test the CDJ1000 mk3 and it is far more easy ...)

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

Turntable

- How do you report qualitprix?

I think it is good even if I have not enough experience

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...

To be confirmed ...

I use the CDJ-200 for a week, coupled with a numark DXM-06 as a mixer. I love this board, very ergonomic instinctiive, easy to use and reliable as a tractor. It fell from my office (one meter) and walk as well as before. MP3 playback works very well and the display of folders is even present (useful when several different playlist on a cd). Using the button as a cue sampler can make very pretty things ... you can connect headphones to the player separately practice to mix two ...
I still do not see major downside, especially as not only mixing of hip hop I did not need to dial to scratch ...

However, I precise that I am a beginner in this field, and I never try to stage another cd before this one. I think she should be very good for beginners who want to learn ....

Julian

- Buy in January 2007, a pair Unitbr 490 />
In other words, it's been a year since I use them regularly, one to two hours a day, I Emene wherever I can mix, (outside / inside), and frankly NOTHING TO SAY, tjrs it works as well, not of problems with the system of front-loading Issue if I'm not mistaken technology used on the Car of the same mark as that is robust ...

The particularity that j'aprecie most, simply use all falls under the fingers, the effects simple but terribly effective not need 20 000 effects when it is known to use these little gems.

After testing Gemini / Numark / Denon, I "stayed in the CDJ200 parcequ'elle are simple no fuss or Blal the goal is not to mix and meter impress with 40,000 unnecessary buttons. The I only regret today is not to be able to test the CDJ400 with their USB ports, but as I do almost no MP3 mix because for the vast majority are CODS files in VBR (Various bit rate, sample rate variable), and the CDJ200 does not interpret them too well, in fact they can be read but impossibility to be a hot fix or broadcast so that's not to wedge evident (shark), so exit the MP3, I encodes wave for those who are at least a 320 Kbps otherwise should not expect a quality great, and others .. I have ben cleared and I pay the equivalent on Beatport (a 2 1 See the MP3 it's cheap to pay for quality).

In terms of quality and price, I do not think I have seen better elsewhere for the degree of sophistication of these Wonders, maybe the Denon would be the height if the Jog of the latter was less flexible ... is a matter of feeling ... As with the CD and it's not even bother to look for a scratch that has nothing to do with the vinyl then must not count on ... MP3 to scratch on there is only one material: RANE and Serato ... Here it says!

If I had to make another choice with the same given without hesitate I repaid a pair of CDJ200 ... If you have the opportunity to test careful you risk leaving them to cry ...

Maj. DJ Laurent -=] C [=- Stinger aka ....

- How long have you use it?
I use them for 1 ½ months, and frankly not much to complain about except that it's a shame that there is no scratch.
- What is so special that you like most and least?
What I like most is the ability to work the 3 Loops and effects that are of exceptional quality. What I like least is when the player does not play VBR encoded format titles, it's pretty bad not being able to calibrate the tracks.
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
Personally I had already tried the Numark Axis 9, the CDJ 800MK2, the CDJ 200, Pioneer DMP 555 and is the model best place quality / price ratio.
- How would you rate the quality / price?
The price / quality ratio is excellent if you find a good commercent.
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

I use the cdj 200 for 1year
quality price ratio there is no picture (then 2008) it has the geule it is reliable and robust I made two nights a week in the pub I take them everywhere is filed ect ect niquel it work!
I love the quality and ergonomics pioneer the master tempo! loops and of course the effects piopio when no table pioneer! I also like its size small and slight costaut!
I like the least manual loops! gallery live but if done! jog too sensitive with respect to the 800 but the advantage is good when you mix on 800 or 1000 is too easy
vbr mp3 in the folder you can not put your cue and not the title of the song.
nival prices in 2007/08 they were a num now the 499th is too expensive is better to take the 400 to 100th over.

no I will not go to choice even if the 200 is very very good but having to buy a DJM600 effects I use most and for the price I will take 800 opportunities for self-loops and vinyl jog! even if I technics mk2 but I admit that the 800 is very convenient while you have vinyl / cd because every time 30kilo vinyl plus 2 plus technics cdj 200 djm 600 ppppffffff plus 2 times a week between room car ect .... it sucks!

How long have you use it?
- Three years of use because of an evening to see for two weekends in mobile public address (so much stuff ki moving) and training from time to time the week (about 3 hours per week).
Have you tried many other models before acqurir
- Tascam CD 302 (platinum with very good option for many of his era .. a true rolls plates is j), in a model of acoustic power (too simple for my taste, do model for listening not for the djing but six years later is still running and those Anns no fault its assets), cdj 1000 (not long).
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
- Goodies: This is a great super robust platinum no concerns about the conduct of an evening with her, well done button gives an impression of solidity reassuring, Quick Start, loop impeccable, indeed a pioneer nothing .. say .. nice design, platinum compacte.En three years no problem except once in the mechanism of slot.
_ Cons: too simple platinum and therefore very limited in the mix, a single loop, and that's all three effects, ratrapage to jog rather difficult not to take control of pitch bend. does not read all MP3.
How do you report qualitprix?
Platinum-CHRE really too for what it offers and I think its too bad, basically I think that's the big problem of disproportionate price pioneer ..!
Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ...
-Never !!!!!! ok it is sturdy but the price is 10 times better denon dns 1200 Cf .. Personal pioneer because I give up too expensive for what it offers S'A ..

How long have you use it?
For 3 years now, because at least one night a week, plus a few hours of training.

What is the particular feature you like best and least?
I love their maneuverability and the ability to easily transport. They are small and offer full enough for a good mix. It makes me laugh to read that they have only one loop, cue point is not the flies ... 80% of DJ's use only 50% of the capacity of a CDJ 1000 MK3. While my CDJ 200 I use the bottom ... and we can do things with, just train!
I love their toughness: I walk a lot, I take care trs, they do not move. They do not make me default once. 5h tests in a concert hall (for Gay Pride!) In the month of June, in spots where it was easily 45 degrees ... ca nickel heats but everything works!
They are beautiful and more ...
What I like least? Nothing ... let's say that there are some dtails embtant (pitch prcis too little) but overall these plates are gniales!

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Before I had one for years Numark Axis MODEL. Bon ben ca has nothing to do!

How do you report qualitprix?
The report qualitprix is ​​excellent, ok, it's expensive, but it was worth the money ...

Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ...
All done!

How long have you use it?
I aientdepuis 15 days, I mix 2 hours / day since

What is the particular feature you like best and least?
ca would mix well with no problem, I know not too APRS are put first turntables
It's my strong air
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
not

How do you report qualitprix? With the exprience, you do again this choice? * ...
10/10 I would do without this choice problem, it is faile learn, good at first I did not understand the Systm of Loops, but with the mode of employment and practice is a game children!
I already mix in 1995 with SL1200 since I no longer find the mixavec these platinesje sensationscomme on SL even a call for songs is very easy with the CUE I do not even know! you press pause on where you want to call your tracks, tul'ajuste jog with you and support of CUE veiled call it too cool.Apr s started to launch hair cell no latency!
APRS good I can not say if the pitch is accurate or not compared to other (first stage) but I get a good mix + and when we pitch a fit snugly like no longer in the mix is ​​amazing dcallage is so cool with electro house trance ....
I knew he had to buy Pioneer or Denon Pioneer is good I chose the good stuff j'hsitais bought the cheap but good with the advice I read, not too cool!
I had my economy took some time but no regrets!
If you want a high-end platinum certe a bit expensive than take the APRS is no regret.
Here's my advice knowing that I beginners in the mix and this is my first turntables cd, but I get great mix with the CDJ-200!

I use it for over 2 years.
I had a numark axis 8 and a DNS-3000 before.

The +:
buckles to the tempo.
Cue reactivity and touched very nice button.
Reading Recovery to the point she was in error ejection.

the -:
BPM counter that is useless as the CDJ throughout the world ... I do not even include those who mix with, there is not even a decimal point when the pitch yes.
Not reading MP3 cds if the tracks are encoded in VBR.
No opportunity to mix with cd timecoded because they have no option scratch.
Fair value for money, if you stretch a budget head for higher models.

For how long have you been using it?
The boards I bought used three months ago, a pair for 400 € (yes, negotiated). They were 3 years when I have bought, so they have 3 years and 3 months. I use them for 3 months.

Did you try many other models before getting this one?
I did some evenings with CDJ400, 800, 1000 and 2000. So yes, I tested quite a few models before, but ... Not in the same price range.

What thing do you like most/least about it?
Pros: quality is just extra! Impeccable. The same accuracy is exceptional.
Cons: Compared to the price, there is none. It regrets the fact that loops can not last a maximum of 4 times, lack of hot cues (but we will not ask anything either), and the fact that you can not save loops in advance.

What is your opinion about the value for the price?
Nothing to say, great value for money! (When I say that's because I paid 400 € the pair ...).
Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
For the price I had, yes. For what it is not. We can not have much "play" with the music. It remains in the mix easy. (We are forced to learn our songs by heart without hot cues: p). But the product is exceptional. Quality pioneer ...

Originally written by peaktrance on Audiofanzine FR.

How long have you been using it?
I've had it for 15 days (I use it two hours a day).

Which feature do you like the most / the least?
Until now, I've had no problems... but it's my first CD deck.
It seems quite sturdy.
Did you try any of other models before buying this one?
No

How would you rate its value for money? Based on your experience, would you buy this product again? ... *
10/10. I wouldn't hesitate to buy it again: easy handling, although I didn't really understand the loop feature in the beginning, but with the user's manual and a bit of practice, it's a breeze!
I had the opportunity to try an SL1200. With this deck, I get the same feel even to sync tracks. It's very easy with the CUE: push Pause where you want to sync the song, adjust it with the jog wheel and push CUE! It will then start without latency!
I cannot say if the pitch control is precise compared to other products but I can mix without problems, it's amazing for electro house trance...

If you want a high-end DJ desk, consider this one although it's a bit expensive. You won't regret it.