All user reviews for the Behringer Ultragain Pro MIC2200

Gather information about the manufacturer's website.

UTILIZATION

Bar graphs useful. Notched buttons handy.
Berhinger textbooks are of good quality. Note that both the DS version is more than in complte franais.

SOUND QUALITY

The note on the sound quality is purely subjective. This is the apprciate each.

OVERALL OPINION

It's been three and a half years I use it. I don 't use it to connect a CD player Yamaha. It is primarily an adaptation to prampli of impdance (in my case).
This Berhinger ULTRAGAIN Pro still works. There 's no grsillement or problem mcaniques (connectors), despite daily use and multiple connections / unplug. This is almost a miracle.
You out of your numerous problem of background noise to inhrent Berhinger on my part, I do not DNote dsagrment of this order (for use as I do). This is the sound hardware. And once again, I can only Berhinger Congratulations.

- What technology is used? (Analog, numrique, lamp ...)
Analog and while "Surface Mount" which complicates or even makes it extremely impossible ultrieur Repair Tool!

A "tube" with a nice LED timer that simulates a lamp that takes its time to Global Warming even when you put the device ON / OFF / ON in a split second ---> feels its marketing , especially since it is hardly attainable if you want to change it.

I was surprised when I remove the six screws that allows us to remove the panels dessu the unit is not clearly see the electrical tape on the portion 120V and hot glue on the connector for PCB hold them in place ... wouaahh ... luckily it's a prt pramp this ... It is written on the box "Ouput Transformer Balanced", I never found the famous transformer output.

UTILIZATION

Simple, manual a bit pointless

SOUND QUALITY

With an MXL 2001, compared to my Studio Project VTB-1, its loose far too easily, no DEFINITIONS, in a low fever, lack many of clarity I will put a good 6 because there are actually good sound coming out but no more.

OVERALL OPINION

I used one day while waiting for my other pramp back of the store but I would pay in any way as bad for pramp Designed and ax on marketing than on the amplification plutt a pure signal, but it's cheap is cheap either, metez a little more money to go to another brand Behringer, made two pramp I test them and just by reading the manual and specifications, it is a pure pleasure to read all the nonsense he can score!

"Between 1 / 4 in parallle branch with the XLR microphone, you can plug a guitar" but yes ... go ahead, induce the less express it in error for continuous buy your product ...

Hello,

Analoqique lamp. Connectors UNESCORecords XlR X2 X2 .6,35. 220V.
Effects: gains and qualiseurs (unnecessary).
A model is rack!

UTILIZATION

All that is simpler:

Mic is a 200 without the pRSET two channels (it is).

there are two qualiseurs, but avoid them as much, frankly we are fed 48V branch if necessary.

Manual useless. Compared

SOUND QUALITY

his little brother single channel, but it is just color, however we can change the lamp and get more heat, many do.
This is a good prampli just prampli, will it harm them disappear and for the price.

OVERALL OPINION

I knew a long time and I DCID to buy a used one, since it will be relgu "collector" Lol.
However I'm using it and it is useful, especially for static via a console.
Yes more and of course there are better, but it is all about budget.
I like how sturdy the ct rack, the accessibility of light possible.
The least: equalizers unnecessary.
Value quality for money: excellent for beginners.
Repeat this choice: Used as anachronistic, but as I had one to troubleshoot.