Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews for the Roland JUNO-D

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.5( 4.5/5 based on 21 reviews )
 13 reviews62 %
 6 reviews29 %
 1 user review5 %
 1 user review5 %
Value For Money : Excellent
solstice4403/20/2008

solstice44's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
I will not repeat the features, everything has been said above. -1 For non-weighted keys with cons

UTILIZATION

Keyboard easy to learn, editing sounds is fairly limited but adequate and simple. The chords generator is very convenient. the manual is quite simple and clear, even if I was not able to manage the afternoon with my MPC2500.

SOUNDS

I mainly of instrumental hip hop, old school enough to trends (big inspiration Funk, Soul, Jazz and some rock).
Drum kits: kits "realists" are very good, those HH / R & B / Electro are less successful.
SFX: From the very basic view of the useless, the sounds are not credible, it is very "gadget"
Piano: Overall very well managed including the large soft and sweet course that put a good slap.
Keyboards & Org: Is there any, organs are mostly well managed and some as the power fst B are incredible, the other sounds are also very well overall.
Guitars: then it is a black spot on the machine, both the electric are rather well done as you are not looking to reproduce a solo anthology, as the acoustics are despicable and unconvincing.
Orch: The bank's is pretty damn good and quite believable as a whole.
World: The sounds are very nice except one or two for special mention shaku are impressive.
Brass: the black dot. The best patches may be marked "clean" and used on music and the realism is not appropriate (eg crunk) but the rest is really infamous and synthetic sounds and very cheap.
Vocal & Pad: The pads are nice backing vocals a little less but the whole is freindly.
Synth: as usual there is everything but since it does not require a synthetic sound to be realistic, they do well, but not as an sh201.
Bass: The bass range and very successful general, however, they tend to saturate at high volume.

Effects: Personally I do not hardly ever used, I apply my own effects on the final mix. Of what he was seeing me they are usually quite successful.

In short sounds range from excellent to awful, if one applies a post recording process sounds are not getting sound very realistic and very hot.

OVERALL OPINION

I use for about five months, I have a big preference for keyboards (piano, rhodes, organs) as well as bass and instruments "world", for cons I do not use acoustic guitars or brass instruments. I have not had the opportunity to try other models but given demonstrations of other products I would say it's an excellent price / quality ratio. I think if I could I would resume with the processing behind it can become one of the best synths of this range, see on some instruments than those of the higher ranges (Note that I use it only for recording and I do not play live, so I can take my time to hack)
eclipse4ever03/28/2007

eclipse4ever's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
All information techniques have already been mentioned, the creator of the agreements is rather nice I think: play your little sister 6 years by pressing 3 notes pif, you have a component. Agreements instead of so sublime as. Finally a gadget is ca.

UTILIZATION

Really easy to use I think I 've never used the manual. The term "modify patch" to manage its sounds in real time, very very practical in concert. It can almost replace the pedal of a piano.

SOUNDS

I'm not expert enough to judge all sounds ... I play a lot of different stuff, I always find a sound that can match the choice is rather wide. The pianos are correct I think, and the rest, although some sounds n 'really hurt and no use has the ear (Si .. if that is true)

OVERALL OPINION

I got this synth for 3 months and I'm really happy with my purchase. Before using it I was playing on a yamaha more upscale (price level anyway) but that does not belong to m. The touch is more sensitive on JUNO and the quality of many sounds including pianos. Its only small default on my part that is its fragility appears (I 've not yet tried to drop it). But if it is light, portable.
Do not hesitate has the aquérir, excellent price / quality ratio. It will surprise you.
Brahma02/04/2007

Brahma's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
See more reviews for the technical ...

UTILIZATION

Here is the foot. No need to get out of the ENA to use it. It soon took over, and is ergonomic. The manual is very clear, we read quickly, quickly understood and therefore the most important uses of the beast very quickly.

SOUNDS

I do not know who said that the strings were average, because personal, I think they fart ... Inevitably, it is always the same problem, if you want a violin that sounds violin, bah must bring a violin. Otherwise it sound good, especially for the price. The pianos are not evils, even if it's not worth the pianos of Motif ES rack, but they are not bad. Same for wurlis and other organs, they are good bills ... Ethnic sounds are very nice, they sound good, and take up space ... The analog synth emulations of old are well made, slightly sparkling, but I love ... For fans of things a little disgusting fat is not the right bike. The brass burst of cum, it feels good, especially for small pieces of crunk! The bass is not exceptional, but I was surprised though they were based on the whole, therefore, it does.

OVERALL OPINION

I've had three weeks, and frankly, it's a good machine ... To be completed with a Fantom XR soon!!
powerchordfx07/06/2006

powerchordfx's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
Characters very good for the range. Apart from the memories of patches, it frankly lacks the User Memory: User Performance only 8, 8 argège briefs, memoranda of agreements ... 8 It's a little lighter.

The highlight is the touch like semi-weighted which is really nice though difficult to master at first ...

The Juno-D has only two MIDI connections! Yes but the output is Merge Out Box! Besides all keyboards should be equipped with this function so convenient ... I found many bugs! For example, the signal EV-5 pedal on a keyboard master transmitted via the Juno-D to an expander does not! Rather than put the D-Beam: good architecture that does not MIDI based Merge would have been more useful!

Big flaw: In the south does not support the signal of a non-powered external Merge Box (although I only have 3 meter cable ...). The same signal is fully supported by my JV-1080, therefore the fault is with the Juno-D ...

UTILIZATION

Roland typically use very logical.
Main drawback to using: Split Mode does not share the keyboard in MIDI channel 2 which is really a mistake on the part of Roland. So it's not a real split mode but a layer!
Editing is simple even though I have had too much time to work.
The D-Beam is a gadget useless without accuracy. I use an EV-5 pedal! Assigning controllers is very convenient but it is too sensitive to certain effects.

SOUNDS

The sounds are generally good because it recognizes a lot of versions + or - SRJV modified series. That said, I find the piano a little shabby. The buttons for editing the sounds in real time are totally in the spirit of the old Juno. The kits are very successful rhythm. Amplification is good (it was too light on the XP-10)
It's enough fun but good compared to my JV-1080 I fully edit the Juno is a little funny! In short, I use the sounds to blend with those of JV: it allows for combinations but good fun all alone without editing the presets of the Juno-D with very dry and cold. And the difference in volume between the sounds, it really stuff myself!

OVERALL OPINION

Price / quality ratio, it is good and the arpeggiator is great!
I am satisfied with the Juno-D even though I was reluctant to sell it because of the direct split mode which is not one! I had to keep my old XP-10 while I intended to resell. Until we have room for a real master keyboard 88 keys, I will just ...
ms8704/20/2006

ms87's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
...

UTILIZATION

The Juno-D is very easy to use, it comes out even without notice ... editing sounds on the other hand is quite limited but is very easy too. A really short synth simple to use and effective at the same time

SOUNDS

The sounds are really good for a keyboard that can be classified low-end. I think especially with the sounds of organ and various keyboards (piano, clavinets ...) really good ...
the brass are not very good but not ugly either, they are suitable enough.
Regarding the effects are very well made and as they are easy to handle, the rendering is really good ...

OVERALL OPINION

This is a great quality / price ratio, especially for its ease of use (I'm starting yet) and good sound for its low price! The only small problem may be, unless I am falling on the wrong number, it is quite fragile and in particular the keys (already eudes bp with ...).
minouchat12/09/2005

minouchat's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
Keyboard 61 keys, trs trs pro and enjoyable the game that reminds me of Roland U 20. (It's not 100% soft, there's a little slap a trs ct fun to play games Piano / Ep). In short it is a strong point of the machine and it's pretty Surprisingly on the entry.
CONTRL level, we find the pitch bend mod Roland, trs convenient for those familiar with the brand. Sr good when you come from Yamaha, one must get used to it a little.
It was the famous D Beam for me that is not used much as the human being is not a dot troisime arm. Anyway I guess plenty of people use it.
The pots in the facade to filter and edit quickly and are a joy vritable can really ring the bbtte as desired. C'tait not an argument for me when buying but now I could do without.

Ct well taken and headphone and LEFT / RIGHT. Hold for a decision pedals. And 2 MIDI only! No Thru, having said that there is a function of the South SOFT THROUGH OUT. But I find really stupid to have the SAVE it.

Its level is the "spquot; usual Roland. More than 640 presets, 20 drum kits, 47 effects and possibilities to affect Reverb, Chorus and its effect on each cross.
64-voice polyphony 16-part.

We have three more functions:
Ryhtme Guide ... a kind of rhythm box / metronome improgrammable whose only interest and lock onto something for work or call. Anyway It's true that from time to time, I found a dresser.
Chord Memory ... A trick mmorisation agree 100% and useless gadget.
And an arpeggiator, which is nice, I think, but if I use very little.
All this comes with a bundle of software on CD Rom 2: a light version of SONAR (SONAR LE) and two soft drinks (An editor, a librarian) who are also on site tlchargableq US Roland.

All at a really low price ... But I remove a congratulations Roland point to the absence of Midi Through!

UTILIZATION

The config is simple trs trs. I have only just used the manual trs. Trs is intuitive but I'm used to from the SERIES of Roland D. .. So I'm not a good guinea pig. I n'dite sounds with the soft or the pots in front (great for live) for passing from page to page on a screen as small, has not made me scared when young but j'tais l ... I must say I got more. In the "wrong damn", the lack of jog wheel and note (I do not like tapping on the buttons). Similarly, there's no sound when you scroll through the patches unlike what you find on korg X. Petit hic also functions only accesible by a keystroke.

SOUNDS

Sounds are many trs but surprise! The Juno D ROMpler more like a keyboard than anything else. There are samples of the sries U, of Canvas, the RS5 editing sauce today. Overall, I find them too punchy and dynamic. But hey that's my opinion. If I had to do by section:
Piano: The sound is pleasant and trs raliste but it's really the home of Roland Roland. This means a round and a rev a bit heavy. Great for the instrumental old (if not classic) or the jazz / blues to pop, but it's not terrible. Those struggling will mail me a little bit, I have a pair of patches that make the thing sound a little SERIES S Yamaha and therefore more about the pop Rock.

The EP: Nice, many people think about the greater good. I find it stunning especially FM lacking heat.

Organs: Too too punchy, lack of vritable hammond.

Battery Kit: Good.

Guitars: Well, realistic and current trs.

Brass: Medium

Orchestra: aa t ever Fort Roland, but a password.

Synth: not original for a bit and then its just a lot of ugly!
Good to be frank, is not the strong point of the machine. Not original, not all Russian.
Still, it is something for every taste and the quality is of the same overall.

Of course, you can edit! But do not expect miracles, the JUNO D JUNO not one, not a D50 but ROMpler. Synthse not really, you can only modify the processing of samples.

Among the stuff a bit irritating, the difference in volume between the patches! Trs annoying to live.

Level expression cons, I find the machine trsrussie. Vritable is a musical instrument and not just a toy technology.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a few weeks, what I like about him: The keyboard trs pro (for the home studio) and sounds of good quality (to live) all for just over 3000 balls. Good even when it has also a lot of small defects, the worst is when even his lack of personality. But when you see the price of romplers There's 10 years! This is when even a great plan!
mathiaschoquet08/19/2005

mathiaschoquet's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
Good

UTILIZATION

Good

SOUNDS

Good

OVERALL OPINION

I use the Juno-D for 4 months and I am delighted. It took me some time before understanding how it works.
I use Cubase SX as a step sequencer and nikel.
A BMOL: the edition of efffets the drum kits is limited trs.

A good product
Ghost_lover08/12/2005

Ghost_lover's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
Connections averages.
Limited Editions.
Look simple but I find super class.

UTILIZATION

Using relatively simple.
Manuel pretty good.

SOUNDS

Very good overall.
The effects can be very well controlled convaicant.
Expression of synths leads to very good wheel.
Aftertouch very good and always faithful.

OVERALL OPINION

At this price, it's great.
GENIAL.
I can do without
nath8308/06/2005

nath83's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
I will not return to this whichis said before ...

UTILIZATION

It's really a "small" synth gnial
edition of the sounds really well thought trs ...
the manual is what it is must be the usual for advice "objective" as quite used this kind of "novel" I demauvaise not find this bill on the contrary!

SOUNDS

Lesz sounds are perfect for that price the product, [it's really affordable trs, less than 460th musicwest uros at the moment (i was bought this week at home)] The Piano are fabulous! !

OVERALL OPINION

It's been one week, and I am satisfied with Fully ... the price is gnial ...

I sign with both hands!
Velhon03/10/2005

Velhon's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Roland JUNO-D
Rv I always have a pure synth sounds with super raliste in order to make the components of quality (I'm rather film music / atmosphere, and another c t symphonic metal).
The Juno-D so it's a synth 61 notes, but heavy hollow buttons fully programmable, pitch wheel / modulation, output standard (mono / stereo, MIDI, etc.), we can plug in a PDAL is buy part, 64 notes polyphony, a ton of effects (chorus, reverb, delay), all in less compltement paramtrable dtail. The sounds are few in number prs 700, they can be combined in dual or split, or can rgler indpendamment custom settings of both in these two modes, style trs is vast, ranging from classical, baroque, jazz, electro, and even techno.

UTILIZATION

The manul is not too bad but may be lack of dtail of certain functions.
The keyboard is simple, it is rapidly trs simple operation of the BTE.
The function buttons of a ct (sound mode / effect / paramtre ...), and the navigation buttons on the other

SOUNDS

As I said, I am plutt trip in film music, so what m'intresse above all is the acoustic sounds, all that is strings, brass, organs, fltes , etc ... and what the ct I t carrment bluff just great! in each CATEGORY, full of variants, in addition to the modulations that can be done on each of the sounds, like the attack, resonance, etc, etc.
The brass are really not bad at all, even if there's any, like sound more or less aggressive and not in the top of instrumenent CATEGORY. But there's really full of brass sounds are superbly raliste, such as sets of horns of all kinds, etc..

The touch is good trs. on the piano is the sound even when the most important on a keyboard, it is beautiful carrment I find the shades are right, full of motions.

OVERALL OPINION

This is the first real synth synth that I offer, I had to wait many years for the price that such an instrument rating. In the beginners I m'tais focal numrique a piano, full key for a truly stunning ism, but I quickly realized that this kind of instrument is the piano for clavi Rist. Me what my boot is to have a wide range of sounds super ralistes, to the orchestration of all kinds, and really the Juno-D is a marvel. For this price you really have not the hsit!