earz
Note : 8 sur 10
« VERY GOOD »
Published on 10/01/12 at 13:07see data sheet.
OVERALL OPINION
few years with many other references. From my point of view better than SM58 for two reasons:
- No it did not sound like the stuffy 58 and has a better definition in the high end (like the beta 58).
- It is much less sensitive to the instruments around repisse (ypercardio requires).
All that does not work in a 58 with a 845 and vice-versa.
I personally prefer this type of micro just more balanced, less expensive with a more modern sound.
OVERALL OPINION
few years with many other references. From my point of view better than SM58 for two reasons:
- No it did not sound like the stuffy 58 and has a better definition in the high end (like the beta 58).
- It is much less sensitive to the instruments around repisse (ypercardio requires).
All that does not work in a 58 with a 845 and vice-versa.
I personally prefer this type of micro just more balanced, less expensive with a more modern sound.