Installation without problem.
no incompatibility meeting.
gnrale configuration could not be more simple, no frills.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Athlon xp 1800, CM Elite I know what, 512 RAM, 80GB HDD 7200tr / m, SB Live 5.1 Platinum soon a Delta 66.
the software works fine on this config.

fl trs uses few resources compared to large "pontures" of computer music as cubase for not naming him.
for the latency, the number of adpend vst in the project.
moreover, it Exceeds by far some squenceurs on certain points.
For example, one edition of crazy for the step sequencer, pitch samples in one click, vol, pan, shift, etc. .. short, it's a dconcertante ease. same with the piano roll, a little gem. place to hack without making "toy" as they say sure.
can include VSTi VSTfx without problem and unlike ...
No problem of so-called compressor when working properly (beh so, what IDE to work 30 dB in cubase has crackles in fl ca compress, I see the problem is not o when you can read a peakmetre ).
and everything for next to nothing.

stability is to go.

against by the system of pattern may put off some. but it is just another way to work.

OVERALL OPINION

I use fl since version 2.0.

most: easy access to
a very thorough edition
everything is automated
Cons: Interface a little at first bordlique
an edition twelve one little feeble, or at least not very practical


fl possesses unsuspected functions, and we learn every day (thank you AF).

qualitprix the report is excellent.
with the "exprience" I would do the same choice.