Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
MOTU 828 mk3 Firewire
Images
1/386

All user reviews for the MOTU 828 mk3 Firewire

FireWire audio interface from MOTU belonging to the 828 series

4.2/5
(19 reviews)
42 %
(8 reviews)
37 %
(7 reviews)
11 %
(2 reviews)
11 %
(2 reviews)
Write a user review
Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • Studio 33Studio 33

    Good sound card for the price

    MOTU 828 mk3 FirewirePublished on 10/31/10 at 14:47
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have a traveler I wanted to spend has 16 tracks in the mix. I used a Studer 916

    UTILIZATION

    good stable drivers updated. used in PC with Nuendo. Correct 23ms latency without cracking a 2.4 ghz intel core. With a newer model should be able to arrive between 6 and 13 ms.

    Note very few stalls but it's rare

    GETTING STARTED

    no problem.

    OVERALL OPINION

    5 months
    Converter ok for the price. I knew better, but for 2 times more expensive. on the other hand on inputs and micro instruments di especially do not use the limit. It is simply very ugly. Monitor output XLR is a plus. All that needs to be digital word clock is appreciable. I would do that choice after a r…
    Read more
    I have a traveler I wanted to spend has 16 tracks in the mix. I used a Studer 916

    UTILIZATION

    good stable drivers updated. used in PC with Nuendo. Correct 23ms latency without cracking a 2.4 ghz intel core. With a newer model should be able to arrive between 6 and 13 ms.

    Note very few stalls but it's rare

    GETTING STARTED

    no problem.

    OVERALL OPINION

    5 months
    Converter ok for the price. I knew better, but for 2 times more expensive. on the other hand on inputs and micro instruments di especially do not use the limit. It is simply very ugly. Monitor output XLR is a plus. All that needs to be digital word clock is appreciable. I would do that choice after a rme sound card is a good option also

    See less
  • DavissDaviss

    good product

    MOTU 828 mk3 FirewirePublished on 11/17/10 at 08:17
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    the number of I / O is a +
    Autonomic function also

    Use with sequencer software vista

    Use home studio

    Some

    UTILIZATION

    bp for the first install, need to reset the machine flat then no worries

    No update for now

    Pb no latency


    GETTING STARTED

    Using relatively simple for a novice like me
    No use of articles intended to relieve the CPU

    OVERALL OPINION

    use for 6 months

    Test Paravant a Tascam 144 (purest start)

    Volume management is generally not practical

    Good value for money

    repeat the same choice: not
    Read more
    the number of I / O is a +
    Autonomic function also

    Use with sequencer software vista

    Use home studio

    Some

    UTILIZATION

    bp for the first install, need to reset the machine flat then no worries

    No update for now

    Pb no latency


    GETTING STARTED

    Using relatively simple for a novice like me
    No use of articles intended to relieve the CPU

    OVERALL OPINION

    use for 6 months

    Test Paravant a Tascam 144 (purest start)

    Volume management is generally not practical

    Good value for money

    repeat the same choice: not
    See less
  • Audiofanzine FRAudiofanzine FR

    MOTU 828 mk3 FirewirePublished on 11/30/08 at 07:50
    (Originally written by Guiloux666/translated from Audiofanzine FR)
    - Which technical specifications motivated your choice?

    Pros:

    * input + parametric EQ + compressor concept.

    * Compact size (1U)

    * Expansion possibilities (two ADAT ports), two FW ports that allow you to cascade several cards via FW with Mac OS X.

    * Multiple input formats (line, mic, toslink, ADAT)

    * Standalone capability for live recording.



    - What do you use it for?

    * Live applications mainly.

    * To replace an analog mixer, which would be much more comprehensive but also heavier. Now I want to buy a Motu 8Pre or a Presonus Digimax FS to add eight mic preamps.

    What's your setup (motherboard, CPU, RAM, har…
    Read more
    (Originally written by Guiloux666/translated from Audiofanzine FR)
    - Which technical specifications motivated your choice?

    Pros:

    * input + parametric EQ + compressor concept.

    * Compact size (1U)

    * Expansion possibilities (two ADAT ports), two FW ports that allow you to cascade several cards via FW with Mac OS X.

    * Multiple input formats (line, mic, toslink, ADAT)

    * Standalone capability for live recording.



    - What do you use it for?

    * Live applications mainly.

    * To replace an analog mixer, which would be much more comprehensive but also heavier. Now I want to buy a Motu 8Pre or a Presonus Digimax FS to add eight mic preamps.

    What's your setup (motherboard, CPU, RAM, hard drive,...)?

    * MacBook Pro with 10.4.11, 1.83 GHz Intel Core Duo, 2 GB Ram, 200 GB Sata HDD (7200 RPM)



    - Do you use it with other instruments or systems (mixing console, preamp, DtD, ...) and what's your setup?

    * For small setups: my Tonelab via SPDIF TosLink, bass footboard via SPDIF RCA, keyboard via stereo line input, second guitar via line input, two vocals mics via the preamps and two additional mics with T1953 preamp via two line inputs.

    * If I want to add a drum kit I will need to connect the Digimax FS preamps via ADAT and I insert noise gates on the bass drum, snare drum and toms.

    UTILIZATION

    - Did you have any problems during the installation?

    No installation problems with my Mac. Th computer had already an old Motu UltraLite driver. Once I removed everything (all files and their locations are listed in the documentation), I downloaded the latest driver release (1.4.8) from the Motu website, I updated the firmware (1.0.6) and everything went sweet.

    - Did you encounter any incompatibility problems?

    No



    - How complicated is the overall configuration?

    It's a breeze with CueMix. It's a bit more complicated but still ok if you only use the front panel. But I also take my Mac with me so I never make the settings on the front panel.



    - Is the user's manual clear and comprehensive?

    Yes. Some details are still not totally clear to me.

    I give it a 7.

    GETTING STARTED

    Is the driver stable?

    Yes but when I rename the tracks in my Mac the Motu Channel Name software crashes.



    - Are they up-to-date?

    Last release: 2008/06/20

    - Which software do you use?

    Logic Audio Pro and I will buy DP5 because I heard CueMix is directly accessible from DP.

    - What's the latency of your system?

    I haven't measured it because I'll use it mainly for live applications.



    - How many tracks can you record/playback simultaneously?

    Input channels:

    Stereo SPDIF Toslink

    Stereo SPDIF RCA

    Five line

    Two mic

    Outputs:

    Two main

    Three monitoring mixes with AN1/2, AN3/4 and AN 5/6

    One echo with AN 7/8 (send) and line input (return)

    OVERALL OPINION

    - How long have you been using it?

    A few months.



    - Which feature do you like the most / the least?

    * Most: integrated compressors (forget about all those heavy racks), EQs like on a real mixing desk, reverb (but not really necessary for me).

    * Least:

    * Click noises in both mic preamps (digital adjustment of the analog preamp's gain with an endless knob). It's a bad joke, considering the price!!

    * I miss a noise gate with a parametric side chain on each channel instead of the three compressor types (very useful for drums).

    * CueMix can't manage mono outputs so you have to create several mixes and manage the pan for mono monitoring mixes. A future CueMix update could solve the problem.

    - Did you try any other models before buying it?

    I've had an Hercules 16/12 FW and I was very satisfied with it but I couldn't use it as a mixing desk, a Motu UltraLite, which is very good (however the 828mk3 has a compressor and an EQ per channel) but it is not rack mountable and thus seemed less reliable to me.



    - How would you rate its value for money?

    Great: I use it as a digital mixer for a small band and the price is reasonable. I bought it on sale (new with a two year warranty).



    - Based on your experience, would you buy this product again?

    Yes considering the sound cards in this price range. But it would be great if Motu added noise gates and created a rack mic preamp with outputs (like the Presonus Digimax FS) because the Motu 8pre has only mic inputs.

    Update four months latter:

    ------------------------------

    I've been using it regularly for four months (including two live gigs). With a Presonus Digimax FS I get 10 mic and 8 line inputs, a group for drums via SPDIF toslink (more convenient to control the full drum kit and to sum it to the main and monitor mixes). I also add an UltraLite (for its two mic inputs) via SPDIF RCA. I have an EQ in almost all inputs and a compressor on the bass drum, snare, toms and vocals channels.

    It's great for live gigs: just make the monitor mixes and don't mess with anything else. It's ultra convenient and it works great (no crashes working 18 hours straight).

    No DSP overload (CueMix prevents overloads during setup and disables the effect).

    To wrap it up, it's a very expandable mixing desk.
    See less
  • peepsaudiopeepsaudio

    MOTU 828 mk3 FirewirePublished on 08/27/08 at 14:47
    I got this a while back because I wanted to upgrade my converter at home and simplify my setup a bit. This converter does those things very well and more, there are a lot of features in this thing that you might not realize. I use it as a preamp, converter, monitor mixer, and for FX on the monitor mix - all in one rack space. This thing is basically great. I'm running a PC setup with Nuendo, Dual Core processing, and 4GB of ram. This connects with firewire though and the processing is done in its own hardware, so your computer doesn't affect its performance really. I use it for microphones and also with DI instruments.

    UTILIZATION

    Installing this is a cinch. It's firewire, s…
    Read more
    I got this a while back because I wanted to upgrade my converter at home and simplify my setup a bit. This converter does those things very well and more, there are a lot of features in this thing that you might not realize. I use it as a preamp, converter, monitor mixer, and for FX on the monitor mix - all in one rack space. This thing is basically great. I'm running a PC setup with Nuendo, Dual Core processing, and 4GB of ram. This connects with firewire though and the processing is done in its own hardware, so your computer doesn't affect its performance really. I use it for microphones and also with DI instruments.

    UTILIZATION

    Installing this is a cinch. It's firewire, so you don't need to crack open your computer case or anything. You really only need to worry about three things: Install your drivers from the CD they give you (though you should check on their website for updates), plug in the power cord, and plug the firewire cable that is provided into your computer. If you have a second soundcard or internal sound in your computer, you will likely have to tell your host which one to use - but other than that setup is very easy. I have no compatibility issues. They have a great manual which is worth reading to get the most out of this box - it's pretty think but they have the same information in many languages.

    GETTING STARTED

    The drivers are updated whenever bugs are discovered as far as I can tell, so no problems there on my system running Nuendo. One of the best things about it is that you can monitor with zero latency. The driver disc has CueMix software which lets you make your own monitor mixes out of the inputs that come directly from the unit itself for zero latency. On top of that, it has built in FX processors so if you wanted say some reverb on a vocal recording, you can do that with just this one box. Pretty awesome. For audio recording purposes, you can get 8 simultaneous inputs, but one of the drawbacks is that that is mostly 1/4" inputs - you only have 2 XLR spots so if you're recording a live band you'll want to have some XLR to 1/4" cables.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I've been using this for a couple years now. I love the versatility and the amount of processes this thing can handle by itself, it makes recording much easier and more streamlined for me. I've used a variety of converters, and while the pres and A/D don't sound like they cost $20,000 - for a home studio they are more than enough. You are getting a great deal for the cost - this would have been unheard of 10, 15 years ago. I'd get it again, I love this thing.
    See less