ddinside
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 02/02/09 at 02:17
Cf Previous Reviews
I prcise just as I Reue is "handcrafted" in Korea.
UTILIZATION
Guitar trs enjoyable to use. It's my body and half Premire j'apprhendais getting started, but in fact, spent much trs trs. It is lighter than my LP.
The electronic is not without default. The volume knob crackles trslgrement end position and the knobs are not well fixs. A little help for flat cl solve the problem and it rgl but hey, these are small default assembly noted.
The string books are not based gniales and are fine (9-42). On this guitar, I mounted directly in the 10-46 Ernie Ball. The sound is more rounded on the treble and gain some momentum.
The bridge is impeccable in my opinion but I am not a luthier. In contrast, seem mcaniques averages. They take the agreement for the moment, but I'm afraid of aging. We feel much diffrence in the quality from those of my Gibson LP.
SOUNDS
This is where I am totally bleuff. Microphones books are not as bad as I expected. It sounds circular, ss dynamics is equilibrated in the clear on my peavey classic 30. On the micro serious lamps + the fund has given a round and warm, it is superb. It's even a little crunch with sustained attacks. It snaps in acute if you pull some strings at the bottom. It's really enjoyable. Playing more lightweight, we obtain a round and warm, ideal for the jazz.
Joint position, the sound is more neutral and can play more in the spirit electro acoustic (well, nothing EXAGRES either). Finally, there are a few of the nasal sound of micro acute CHARACTERISTICS gibson, with a little less dynamic when same.
When going on a sustained overdrive, the micro acute takes the advantage with a grain and warmth caratristique. Ideal for the rock of ZZ Top is powerful, bold, and the body brings a surplus of non ngligeable sustain. Personally, I love.
Of course, needless to say that if you are looking for a metallic sound, to be saturated, crystalline, go your way.
Dernire small note: I russi ringing my Marschall MG100DFX! If so, it's true. Well, should not expect miracles, but frankly the silent sound acceptable. This is to say what brings the cash in terms of roundness and warmth ...
OVERALL OPINION
I have since before yesterday. I was able to compare with my gibson LP and my Fender Start Mex Classic Player 60. I wanted a guitar with a sound diffrent and frankly, I am well served. I think for the price would have a hard t get any better. The violin is really pretty and I think that by changing the pickups to the Gibson, sounding honestly could IDAL. APRS has piphone rest of the equipment level. Honntement, his cot is really good trs.
I tried a Yamaha AES620 home, and also a peavey MODEL. There was a grain but is was less characters, or too c'tait draft.
Frankly, I will talk a little more perspective, but what I would do this choice, frankly, without hsiter.
I prcise just as I Reue is "handcrafted" in Korea.
UTILIZATION
Guitar trs enjoyable to use. It's my body and half Premire j'apprhendais getting started, but in fact, spent much trs trs. It is lighter than my LP.
The electronic is not without default. The volume knob crackles trslgrement end position and the knobs are not well fixs. A little help for flat cl solve the problem and it rgl but hey, these are small default assembly noted.
The string books are not based gniales and are fine (9-42). On this guitar, I mounted directly in the 10-46 Ernie Ball. The sound is more rounded on the treble and gain some momentum.
The bridge is impeccable in my opinion but I am not a luthier. In contrast, seem mcaniques averages. They take the agreement for the moment, but I'm afraid of aging. We feel much diffrence in the quality from those of my Gibson LP.
SOUNDS
This is where I am totally bleuff. Microphones books are not as bad as I expected. It sounds circular, ss dynamics is equilibrated in the clear on my peavey classic 30. On the micro serious lamps + the fund has given a round and warm, it is superb. It's even a little crunch with sustained attacks. It snaps in acute if you pull some strings at the bottom. It's really enjoyable. Playing more lightweight, we obtain a round and warm, ideal for the jazz.
Joint position, the sound is more neutral and can play more in the spirit electro acoustic (well, nothing EXAGRES either). Finally, there are a few of the nasal sound of micro acute CHARACTERISTICS gibson, with a little less dynamic when same.
When going on a sustained overdrive, the micro acute takes the advantage with a grain and warmth caratristique. Ideal for the rock of ZZ Top is powerful, bold, and the body brings a surplus of non ngligeable sustain. Personally, I love.
Of course, needless to say that if you are looking for a metallic sound, to be saturated, crystalline, go your way.
Dernire small note: I russi ringing my Marschall MG100DFX! If so, it's true. Well, should not expect miracles, but frankly the silent sound acceptable. This is to say what brings the cash in terms of roundness and warmth ...
OVERALL OPINION
I have since before yesterday. I was able to compare with my gibson LP and my Fender Start Mex Classic Player 60. I wanted a guitar with a sound diffrent and frankly, I am well served. I think for the price would have a hard t get any better. The violin is really pretty and I think that by changing the pickups to the Gibson, sounding honestly could IDAL. APRS has piphone rest of the equipment level. Honntement, his cot is really good trs.
I tried a Yamaha AES620 home, and also a peavey MODEL. There was a grain but is was less characters, or too c'tait draft.
Frankly, I will talk a little more perspective, but what I would do this choice, frankly, without hsiter.