View other reviews for this product:
Published on 09/12/09 at 05:19
RAS
OVERALL OPINION
I bought this kit was released, I waited a long time before DPOS notice, because I wanted to try other micro and be sure it is not my battery that sounds bad.
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Before: no no.
APRS: I work with clubs so Beta52A benefits, beta91, AKG D112, SM57, beta98, E904, Oktava mk012, AKG C1000.
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The best: the microphones oh not sound too bad: compared with overhead AT4040, is doing a not so bad. Work placement.
The least: The bass drum: it is pure crap, I insist. In rock, reggae, dub, electro, funk, metal etc, we seek a sound with the bass to vibrate the abdomen, and acute attack. For cons, the board of 250 500 Hz do not like it, but then at all. And micro is full of these frequencies. For me this is a peak frquences, which make it unusable, and then twisting the eq. A shit
Always the least: The Snare: Micro with a bump 250 Hz, can be INTERESTED, but in my case, where my skin typing is severe enough, it's pretty horrible. So I cut up to 200Hz. For the rest of the spectrum is not too bad.
Even the least: The tom: On a floor tom c'es really rotten! Unusable, except trigger.
Tom on acute cons is really not that bad. I do not trig same tom acute.
How do you report qualitprix?
Not good for the made in china with 3 microphones on a battery unusable classic rock.
Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
No, I strongly dcommande purchase. Ok I compared the big names, but the need arrter, these microphones mritent not support mdiatique and everything. It's low-end Chinese POINT! Never ssay kits T-bone, but at least I never had bad surprises with T-bone, so see!
I can send extracts, compared a beta 52 on kick and snare on a sm57. sent me a message.
OVERALL OPINION
I bought this kit was released, I waited a long time before DPOS notice, because I wanted to try other micro and be sure it is not my battery that sounds bad.
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Before: no no.
APRS: I work with clubs so Beta52A benefits, beta91, AKG D112, SM57, beta98, E904, Oktava mk012, AKG C1000.
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The best: the microphones oh not sound too bad: compared with overhead AT4040, is doing a not so bad. Work placement.
The least: The bass drum: it is pure crap, I insist. In rock, reggae, dub, electro, funk, metal etc, we seek a sound with the bass to vibrate the abdomen, and acute attack. For cons, the board of 250 500 Hz do not like it, but then at all. And micro is full of these frequencies. For me this is a peak frquences, which make it unusable, and then twisting the eq. A shit
Always the least: The Snare: Micro with a bump 250 Hz, can be INTERESTED, but in my case, where my skin typing is severe enough, it's pretty horrible. So I cut up to 200Hz. For the rest of the spectrum is not too bad.
Even the least: The tom: On a floor tom c'es really rotten! Unusable, except trigger.
Tom on acute cons is really not that bad. I do not trig same tom acute.
How do you report qualitprix?
Not good for the made in china with 3 microphones on a battery unusable classic rock.
Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
No, I strongly dcommande purchase. Ok I compared the big names, but the need arrter, these microphones mritent not support mdiatique and everything. It's low-end Chinese POINT! Never ssay kits T-bone, but at least I never had bad surprises with T-bone, so see!
I can send extracts, compared a beta 52 on kick and snare on a sm57. sent me a message.