View other reviews for this product:
AuréLélé « I like »
Published on 08/23/11 at 11:39
Value For Money :
Poor
What connections (audio, MIDI ...)?
2 analog audio in/6out
a digital audio in / 1 out (stereo)
twelve o'clock 2in/2out
USB connection to connect to the computer
He has an effects section?
yes but I do not use
A compressor and an eq on the master
2 fx (rgb, delay ,...) available but only by a pad
How many sounds and styles available? Are they edited? Through a utility Mac / PC?
every style of music but brought rap / hiphop / brum n bass
yes the sounds are. wav therefore editable on computer
UTILIZATION
The general configuration is it simple?
mpc style requires time s'abituer but once done it's good c
The manual is clear and sufficient?
yes well done
The usual functions are they easily accessible?
yes
SOUNDS
sounds are not bad but any way we can add these samples is no problem
the principle
the fx are a bit drastic
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 2 years
I did not try another model but it suits me very well because it allows me to sample and make melody above mees
other times I did it but the drum pads are a bit small compared to the mpc 2500 ... the blow a little less simple
on the other hand for tunes is not bad because there are 16 pads x 4 making 4stroke
(Compare to the 500 that are only 12)
good value for money
I regret just the size of the pads at the same time the mpc 2500 is far too expensive, and with the update of bone on the MPC1000 (bone dd) we obtain the same functionality as the mpc 2500
So I finally remake the choice
2 analog audio in/6out
a digital audio in / 1 out (stereo)
twelve o'clock 2in/2out
USB connection to connect to the computer
He has an effects section?
yes but I do not use
A compressor and an eq on the master
2 fx (rgb, delay ,...) available but only by a pad
How many sounds and styles available? Are they edited? Through a utility Mac / PC?
every style of music but brought rap / hiphop / brum n bass
yes the sounds are. wav therefore editable on computer
UTILIZATION
The general configuration is it simple?
mpc style requires time s'abituer but once done it's good c
The manual is clear and sufficient?
yes well done
The usual functions are they easily accessible?
yes
SOUNDS
sounds are not bad but any way we can add these samples is no problem
the principle
the fx are a bit drastic
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 2 years
I did not try another model but it suits me very well because it allows me to sample and make melody above mees
other times I did it but the drum pads are a bit small compared to the mpc 2500 ... the blow a little less simple
on the other hand for tunes is not bad because there are 16 pads x 4 making 4stroke
(Compare to the 500 that are only 12)
good value for money
I regret just the size of the pads at the same time the mpc 2500 is far too expensive, and with the update of bone on the MPC1000 (bone dd) we obtain the same functionality as the mpc 2500
So I finally remake the choice