Marshall 1960A JCM900 - luke 34's review
translatedThere are times when I do not understand ... how little we say that this speaker cabinet MODEL is the shit! is not out of course you have to compare like with like I use this personal speaker now als…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - brui2fon's review
translatedI just wanted to remember 2 or 3 things .... 1) Marshall is the inventor of Baffle 4 * 12 closed (yes ...) 2) The Marshall speaker cabinets are designed to go with Marshall amps, and make the M…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - imrryr's review
translatedBaffle archi-known, exists in several versions (hp) is what must be some good finds, sr gt12/75 between the equipment and the vintage 30 or greenback, it must have the cart! Here is the test that i…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - patvmax's review
translatedSay what you want, for me they are the best .. I use them for more than 25 years, old and new! and I must say also that I did not have that marshall, the concurrency was also tested: peavey, engl, me…
Marshall VS412B - ghostrocket70's review
translatedI use this speaker with a jcm 900 head, the sound is awful, for the price buy a behringer plutt a baffle 250 is cheap there is no logo but it is a Marshall best value for money.
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - musicalcem's review
translated4x Celestion GT12-75 on wheels choice of 16 ohm or 4ohm mono 8 ohm stereo a real shit !!!-----> attention, a real shit for heavy or prog!, the sound is not accurate, that drool all over ... …
Marshall 1960B - awks's review
translatedIn the middle of 10 different booths (1960VTa & b, 1960JCM800a & b, 1965a & b, 1966a & b. ....) this one is among the best ever. 20 years at home and on stage from time to time, this beast does not f…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - awks's review
translatedFor 30 years, two cab1960 trs old and 20 years since the 1960 SERIES JCM800 with 4x12G12T75 .. In the first of the Greenbacks and Vintage 25 in the other two G12T75, which has said the worst and the …
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - werty1's review
translatedBe careful, I might irritate the rockers, but this cabinet, what crap! I should seal the vendor has convinced me that the era marshall 1960a, the big sound on the cheap! I tried lots of tricks (para …
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - doodb's review
translatedI certainly do not understand the criticism that has made this brand! It is true that the original hp are good but nothing more, but once replaced by v30 ........ It sounds the ennnnnooooooorme! I'…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - vlandrieu's review
translatedI'm pretty tonn to read as much criticism on this ngatives baffle. I use it for 5 years and he always satisfied in all situations. J'apprcie much versatility and made trs balance. I've used in severa…
Marshall 8412 - mijac's review
translatedI possde the cabinet for 15 years coupled with a marshall 8100 head pay 2500 francs era It is equipped Cellestis low-end at the finish, the Tolex is strong, it is not bad, but quite heavy possd…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - yoyoland's review
translatedI intend to buy this cabinet soon and a little like brui2fon, I am a little "angry at the people who break the material to death because it is not for their style. Marshall is still a benchmark for r…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - planetslide's review
translatedI know the 1960 having only jou over quite often in the studio. So I think have a fairly objective view, because it tends to praise his gear. Whatever anyone says, I would simply say that one is a…
Marshall 1960BV - slayer76's review
translatedI use this cabinet for a year and I must say that I jou is never as good on a speaker much better than the 1960 lead of any fawn there is no n RAPORT because it is like even a bit more dear the lead.…
