View other reviews for this product:
Negens
Published on 03/21/09 at 09:16
Prampli transistor (it has to hide from the mosfet below).
Jack in and out.
An XLR with phantom power supply would apprciable t.
A drive, 3 band eq and output level.
Select a type of amplification.
3 push buttons to select and save presets.
The case is solid seems to be designed for the rigors of scne.
UTILIZATION
Operation is simple and intuitive, it's a breeze.
The manual is ultra clear.
Is obtained relatively easily with a good sound that prampli.
SOUND QUALITY
The sounds are excellent if you know there is one thing not in the chain ngliger sound of electric guitar: The cabinet!
Having bought this tool to save the DMOS home, I do not use it in live condition or BPS. So I plug the SansAmp in between my audio interface (Presonus Firepod A).
It sounds pretty good but for longtempsn I am not able to get sensation alism and I found the sound will integrate a hard mix. Ms. using baffles to GuitarRig or Amplitube, I was well and nothing more. And lacked body ...
Until I make the acquisition of AudioEase Speakerphone, a simulator of baffles on the bottom rponses pulse. And the sound of the blow seems bigger, more natural, with all mediums must be low, warm ...
O On the importance of the cabinet!
I play everything from blues to progressive.
I use a Schecter C-1 30th Anniversary and I think the characters of the guitar is prserv.
I then passes through a digitech Hardwired Stereo Reverb RV-7.
The sounds are immediately trsralistes.
In his clear, sounds british typs are easy to obtain.
I am not convinced by the tweed, with too severe Submitted. Possdnant a Fender, I do not find anything on the SansAmp.
Modes and especially Brit Calif. are excellent.
Having had a PODxt before, I can tell you that the SansAmp is well above the modlisation Line6.
The distortion sounds are incredible.
Without being the "lamps" was the level of the best transos. That's a supper that I use MOSFET.
The sounds of the Marshall ct warm CHARACTERISTICS makes dlicieux soli.
The Mesa sounds are not bad but lacked a little in the attacks agressivit if you want to do mtal trsmchant.
The subtle modulations and great passing game and are not gums.
They are in dous Tech 21!
The Line6 is compltement Largu!
As I have acquired in order to record my demo ides without sweat the whole neighborhood, I could explore what was given in a mix:
- THE FIRST thing that appears is that what is transcribed is the pseudo simulation intgre HP is really not the SansAmp gniale. And raises more or less becomes a problem because of the blow almost impossible grate in the mix ... An investment in speakerphone, and l. .. Oh my god!! Well, it's not just for the demo versions that I will use the SansAmp!
Solo or double track of a real amp, a happening, no matter what.
Applying the corrections frquentielles "classic" of a mix, and going alone. It frankly illusion.
However, I would say it is not empty to find the right rglage active with the legalization (a formidable efficiency TOO) of the SansAmp. I have to fight several weeks to get your exact I was looking for.
This is an excellent product condition to spend time on it refine its rglages ds, adapt to the rest of his hardware, when you want ds group play or record with.
What makes a product look easy to use, but which in fact rvle plutt hard use in the end.
Well no, it's not fool-proof in fact. If you ESPRI of plug'n'play, this is not the best solution out there.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for four months.
The feature that I like most:
+ Solid.
+ Clean and simple interface.
+ Sounds practitioner.
+ Trs the legalization effective (if you know you are going o).
+ The possibility to use it to catch sounds, without sounds ridiculous.
The feature that I like least:
- The lack of an XLR with phantom power supply
- Simulation of tweed limit caricature and too low frequencies.
- Spend time temperatures requiring the non ngligeable rgler not as easy as it seems.
- Do rvle prsence potential that a (power amp +) baffle.
Aqurir before, I had a PODxt, gear I n'espre not see under my feet. I tried a Vox Tonelab, really not bad, but leaving the all-in-one to pass individual pedals, I did not port this choice.
The ultra-zoom digital and sound cart I direct this choice.
The report is qualitprix Dante! It's amazing to have such quality for so little. Especially since I've made the offer to Nol!
With exprience, and I would say even with exprience, it's a choice I would do. Even if the SansAmp looks intuitive, I do not advise beginners. Indeed, with exprience, we get what we want, but if not, may be your exact dcevant (I even sell the bankrupt to beginners. I want by saying that it is better connatre well the subtleties of string sound before acqurir a SansAmp.
In short, a great product, but does not address all, despite what one might think.
Jack in and out.
An XLR with phantom power supply would apprciable t.
A drive, 3 band eq and output level.
Select a type of amplification.
3 push buttons to select and save presets.
The case is solid seems to be designed for the rigors of scne.
UTILIZATION
Operation is simple and intuitive, it's a breeze.
The manual is ultra clear.
Is obtained relatively easily with a good sound that prampli.
SOUND QUALITY
The sounds are excellent if you know there is one thing not in the chain ngliger sound of electric guitar: The cabinet!
Having bought this tool to save the DMOS home, I do not use it in live condition or BPS. So I plug the SansAmp in between my audio interface (Presonus Firepod A).
It sounds pretty good but for longtempsn I am not able to get sensation alism and I found the sound will integrate a hard mix. Ms. using baffles to GuitarRig or Amplitube, I was well and nothing more. And lacked body ...
Until I make the acquisition of AudioEase Speakerphone, a simulator of baffles on the bottom rponses pulse. And the sound of the blow seems bigger, more natural, with all mediums must be low, warm ...
O On the importance of the cabinet!
I play everything from blues to progressive.
I use a Schecter C-1 30th Anniversary and I think the characters of the guitar is prserv.
I then passes through a digitech Hardwired Stereo Reverb RV-7.
The sounds are immediately trsralistes.
In his clear, sounds british typs are easy to obtain.
I am not convinced by the tweed, with too severe Submitted. Possdnant a Fender, I do not find anything on the SansAmp.
Modes and especially Brit Calif. are excellent.
Having had a PODxt before, I can tell you that the SansAmp is well above the modlisation Line6.
The distortion sounds are incredible.
Without being the "lamps" was the level of the best transos. That's a supper that I use MOSFET.
The sounds of the Marshall ct warm CHARACTERISTICS makes dlicieux soli.
The Mesa sounds are not bad but lacked a little in the attacks agressivit if you want to do mtal trsmchant.
The subtle modulations and great passing game and are not gums.
They are in dous Tech 21!
The Line6 is compltement Largu!
As I have acquired in order to record my demo ides without sweat the whole neighborhood, I could explore what was given in a mix:
- THE FIRST thing that appears is that what is transcribed is the pseudo simulation intgre HP is really not the SansAmp gniale. And raises more or less becomes a problem because of the blow almost impossible grate in the mix ... An investment in speakerphone, and l. .. Oh my god!! Well, it's not just for the demo versions that I will use the SansAmp!
Solo or double track of a real amp, a happening, no matter what.
Applying the corrections frquentielles "classic" of a mix, and going alone. It frankly illusion.
However, I would say it is not empty to find the right rglage active with the legalization (a formidable efficiency TOO) of the SansAmp. I have to fight several weeks to get your exact I was looking for.
This is an excellent product condition to spend time on it refine its rglages ds, adapt to the rest of his hardware, when you want ds group play or record with.
What makes a product look easy to use, but which in fact rvle plutt hard use in the end.
Well no, it's not fool-proof in fact. If you ESPRI of plug'n'play, this is not the best solution out there.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for four months.
The feature that I like most:
+ Solid.
+ Clean and simple interface.
+ Sounds practitioner.
+ Trs the legalization effective (if you know you are going o).
+ The possibility to use it to catch sounds, without sounds ridiculous.
The feature that I like least:
- The lack of an XLR with phantom power supply
- Simulation of tweed limit caricature and too low frequencies.
- Spend time temperatures requiring the non ngligeable rgler not as easy as it seems.
- Do rvle prsence potential that a (power amp +) baffle.
Aqurir before, I had a PODxt, gear I n'espre not see under my feet. I tried a Vox Tonelab, really not bad, but leaving the all-in-one to pass individual pedals, I did not port this choice.
The ultra-zoom digital and sound cart I direct this choice.
The report is qualitprix Dante! It's amazing to have such quality for so little. Especially since I've made the offer to Nol!
With exprience, and I would say even with exprience, it's a choice I would do. Even if the SansAmp looks intuitive, I do not advise beginners. Indeed, with exprience, we get what we want, but if not, may be your exact dcevant (I even sell the bankrupt to beginners. I want by saying that it is better connatre well the subtleties of string sound before acqurir a SansAmp.
In short, a great product, but does not address all, despite what one might think.