View other reviews for this product:
CMC6
Published on 11/24/07 at 01:31
Large diaphragm condenser microphone
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a year or so, I was able to listen cot other large membranes, C414 (2x more expensive), U87 (7/8x more expensive), it is doing really well. the ratio Q / P is remarkable, trs equilibrated on voice, impeccable in OH, even when pummeled below, works well on guitars, a xylophone, ... short, versatile enough, I had no opportunity of serious costs on instrumentals.
I also know that the AT4050 is as well but even more versatile, we can CHARACTERISTICS rgler the microphone, so we have even more opportunities for the taking.
I think in a set of micro imporant it is to have because it holds up, I really feel like the costs to scne, we see from time to time ...
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a year or so, I was able to listen cot other large membranes, C414 (2x more expensive), U87 (7/8x more expensive), it is doing really well. the ratio Q / P is remarkable, trs equilibrated on voice, impeccable in OH, even when pummeled below, works well on guitars, a xylophone, ... short, versatile enough, I had no opportunity of serious costs on instrumentals.
I also know that the AT4050 is as well but even more versatile, we can CHARACTERISTICS rgler the microphone, so we have even more opportunities for the taking.
I think in a set of micro imporant it is to have because it holds up, I really feel like the costs to scne, we see from time to time ...