Log in
Log in

or
Learning
1 comment

Recording drums - A matter of perspective

The ultimate guide to audio recording - Part 33

Today I'd like to discuss with you something that goes beyond drums recording strictly speaking. Actually, what we'll see has probably more to do with the mixdown stage, but I think it's nevertheless useful to discuss it here, too: panorama. In other words: should you think about the drums from the listener's or the drummer's perspective?

Recording drums - A matter of perspective: The ultimate guide to audio recording - Part 33
View other articles in this series...

Once upon a time…

The first time I ever asked myself this question was at the beginning of the century. I had decided to dedicate my life to music and, back then, my university studies were still pretty fresh. What does that have to with anything, you ask? Well it just so happens that I was supposed to become a math teacher. So, after doing lots of research on the topic and analyzing tons of mixes, I couldn’t get a straight answer regarding the panorama of a drum kit, which led me to put to use my statistics knowledge to carry out a study. I would’ve never imagined that 15 years later it would help me write an article for Audiofanzine… I guess it was destiny.

Here are the results of the survey I did and the conditions under which it was made.

Methodology

To carry out the study I considered a group of 200 persons distributed in the following way:

  • 50% “ordinary” people, i.e. without any significant musical experience
  • 50% musicians or audio engineers – knowledgeable professionals or amateurs
  • 20% of the latter were drummers
Left Handed drum kit

Each person had to listen to three different versions of the same song under their usual music “consumption” conditions. The first two versions were identical except for a small detail: the drums on one were mixed from the point of view of the audience and the other one from that of the drummer. The third one was a sort of “trap” because it was exactly the same as one of the others. Obviously, the subject didn’t know in advance what the object of the study was. Once they had listened to the songs they simply had to fill in a questionnaire. Something like this:

  • Did you notice any changes between the different versions?
  • If you did, what changed?
  • Did you prefer any of the versions? If you did, which one did you like better and why?
  • Under which conditions did you hear the songs?
  • How would you consider your musical consumption? If possible, indicate the approximate frequency and amount of consumption.
  • Do you play an instrument? If you do, which one and at what level (pro, semi-pro, amateur, other)?
  • Do you have any practical or technical knowledge of sound (as a professional or semi-professional audio engineer, studies in physics, etc.). If you do, please specify at what level.

At the end of the questionnaire was a rather “original” section dedicated to personal information such as age, gender, place of birth, profession, level of studies, height, eye color, length of hair, etc. The idea was to create some confusion in order to get to what I really wanted to get: discover whether the listener was right or left-handed. I somehow sensed that this laterality issue could be important, but I did not want to condition the respondents asking them only this information.

Now let’s look at the results.

This and that

I’ll begin with the drummers. Every one of them identified the versions correctly. 80% among them preferred what is commonly called the “point of view of the drummer” but… only one of them was a lefty! On the other hand, among the 20% that preferred the “point of view of the audience” only one was right-handed. And since the rest were lefties, the famous “point of view of the audience” was actually the “point of view of the drummer.” In short, 90% of them went for the point of view of the musician. Interesting, isn’t it?

Now, let’s see what the musicians thought: 96% identified correctly each version, 4% got at least one of them wrong so their eventual preference was considered invalid. 33% preferred the point of view of the audience, 60% that of a right-handed drummer, 3% didn’t indicate any preference. If you remove the drummers from this group, 36.25% preferred the audience’s point of view and 55% the drummer’s, 3.75% didn’t care.

Laterality had no significant influence among the group of musicians, excluding drummers. However, the instrument played seemed to have an important role, since 3/4 of the people who preferred the point of view of the drummer played either guitar or bass.

Now let’s look at the results of those who have no direct relationship to the music world: 90% of them identified each of the versions correctly. As before, the remaining 10% got at least one of them wrong so their eventual preference was considered invalid. 37% expressed their preference for the point of view of the audience, and only 19% for that of the drummer. 34% didn’t prefer any of them. Once again laterality didn’t seem to have any significant influence on this sample. But I discovered a somewhat odd detail: 85% of the people who preferred the point of view of the audience listened to the songs in their cars.

To finish, let’s consider the overall results: From the 200 persons surveyed:

  • 7% couldn’t identify the versions correctly
  • 18.5% had no preference
  • 35% preferred the point of view of the audience
  • 39.5% preferred the point of view of the right-handed drummer

I’ll leave you to analyze the results until next time, when I’ll tell you my own personal conclusion.

← Previous article in this series:
Recording drums — First rough mix
Next article in this series:
Recording drums — Panning →
  • dave scar 1 post
    dave scar
    New AFfiliate
    Posted on 05/22/2017 at 05:46:47
    Great article and study. I swear there's at least one Cream song where the drum panning is reversed, and it makes figuring out what Ginger is playing much more difficult (for me anyway). Is the drum panning for most recordings done from the drummer's perspective?

Would you like to comment this article?

Log in
Become a member
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Audience analysis (Google Analytics)
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising (Google Ads)
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.
Marketing (Meta Pixel)

On our websites, we use the Meta Pixel. The Meta Pixel is a remarketing pixel implemented on our websites that allows us to target you directly via the Meta Network by serving ads to visitors of our websites when they visit the social networks Facebook and Instagram. The meta pixel are code snippets which are able to identify your browser type via the browser ID - the individual fingerprint of your browser - and to recognise that you have visited our websites and what exactly you have looked at on our websites. When you visit our websites, the pixel establishes a direct connection to Meta's servers. Meta is able to identify you by your browser ID, as this is linked to other data about you stored by Meta on your Facebook or Instagram user account. Meta then delivers individualised ads from us on Facebook or on Instagram that are tailored to your needs.

We ourselves are not in a position to identify you personally via the meta pixel, as apart from your browser ID no other data is stored with us via the pixel.

For more information about the Meta Pixel, the details of data processing via this service and Meta's privacy policy, please visit Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Facebook and Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Instagram.

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.


We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Audience analysis (Google Analytics)

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising (Google Ads)

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

Marketing (Meta Pixel)

On our websites, we use the Meta Pixel. The Meta Pixel is a remarketing pixel implemented on our websites that allows us to target you directly via the Meta Network by serving ads to visitors of our websites when they visit the social networks Facebook and Instagram. The meta pixel are code snippets which are able to identify your browser type via the browser ID - the individual fingerprint of your browser - and to recognise that you have visited our websites and what exactly you have looked at on our websites. When you visit our websites, the pixel establishes a direct connection to Meta's servers. Meta is able to identify you by your browser ID, as this is linked to other data about you stored by Meta on your Facebook or Instagram user account. Meta then delivers individualised ads from us on Facebook or on Instagram that are tailored to your needs.

We ourselves are not in a position to identify you personally via the meta pixel, as apart from your browser ID no other data is stored with us via the pixel.

For more information about the Meta Pixel, the details of data processing via this service and Meta's privacy policy, please visit Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Facebook and Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Instagram.

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.