Marshall MG10CF

I've had three weeks, and I had the previous version (MG10CD) in fact I still have it.
What you lose compared to the former is independent exit line out and my faith is a shame because the option wet-dry-wet leaves. Well, on this type of product I doubt that this was common.
You also lose permanent background noise.

We win by against the possibility of an easy decision to change channels remotely, it's very cool.

Otherwise it is similar in function, clean volume, drive volume, gain, and overall tone.

UTILIZATION

Against the previous clean is the same, or too thin next to the canal saturax but strong.
The saturax is best dosed by volume and especially saturation.
The contour is a tone, it's effective.

SOUNDS

It's amazing wickedness! But in the grain class, a real treat.
I noticed a couple of times funny noise with the gain to the cleat, screaming like dogs, also recorded in a test of big brother 15w.
Against by these sounds have manifested more since I made the decision for the footswitch.

The clean is cut in the bass, it's a shame because the hp ensures good. It's still quite playable huh, I must find the component responsible for the slaying!

OVERALL OPINION

Not yet used on sound (the former excelled in this exercise) or big box, I will update.
The carbon finish is beautiful, very tactile, a beautiful object.

Considering the price, I see very little anything to compete with him, given the sound it produces delicious.

For a little effort you have a remote for the channels, the equalizer if you just plug the thing on your mixer or other (which will handle the possible effects), this brief is not a toy.

I will update course.