Log in
Log in

or
Enlarge
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Universal Audio Apollo Twin MKII Quad
Images
1/320

Review Universal Audio Apollo Twin MKII Quad

Thunderbolt audio interface from Universal Audio belonging to the Apollo series

Write a user review or Ask for a user review
Written test
Comment
Universal Audio Apollo Twin MKII Review Yet another step forward
9/10
Share this article

Three years ago Universal Audio introduced the Apollo Twin, a more friendly priced desktop version of their Apollo flagship audio interface.

Then came the Apollo 8 (mid 2015) following in the steps of the original Apollos (2012), an Apollo Twin USB 3 (early 2016) for Windows, and last November a software update (9.0) that makes all Thunderbolt interfaces compatible with Microsoft’s latest OS. 2017 marks the arrival of the Twin MkII, a version adapted to current times and with some very welcome additions.

After the Apollo “racks, ” it was only natural for the small Twin to get a well-deserved revitalization. Like the Apollo 8, the Twin MkII changed color to a darker gray, but not as dark as the rack versions, fitting perfectly into the aesthetics of the new MacBooks Pro (which is surely no small coincidence!). The face-lift was a complete success and even if the design doesn’t change much, the results are awesome.

Down the hole

It is the same size and it’s also exactly the same in terms of connectivity: two XLR/TRS input combos, one instrument input, two TRS line output pairs, one headphone out, one S/PDIF TOSlink input, and unfortunately still only one Thunderbolt port. Plus a connector for the mandatory external PSU.

Apollo Twin 1

While it’s easy to understand that the DSPs require lots of power for the Twin to be bus-powered, it nevertheless poses a disadvantage compared to competing products like the RME Babyface Pro, for instance. The absence of a second Thunderbolt port is also a handicap with certain MacBooks that feature only one port, because it forces you to buy a Thunderbolt dock to connect other peripherals using the same technology (screens, HDDs, etc.). And it’s even more of a pity since you can now chain up to four Apollos and six UAD-2 devices in order to add inputs and outputs to your system.

If you look closely at the interface you can see a tiny hole right underneath the big main knob. That’s one of the new features of the Twin MkII: a talkback mic! It will allow you to talk to the musicians without the need to plug in anything else. And it’s all smoothly integrated into the virtual mixer with a fader and a Talk button, sends and even inserts! You can also control the send level of the talkback in the different Cues and even choose to send the mic signal to the monitors – do mind the feedback, though! And there’s obviously a Talkback button on the Twin to activate the mic (if you press and hold the button the talkback is active until you release it; otherwise you can press it shortly to leave the talkback active until your press the button again). Apart from this, the new Twin features some other functions related to monitoring, like dim, mono, mute, and Alt (to switch to a second pair of speakers), as well as FCN (to control certain functions of other Apollos in the network). Very nice add-ons indeed!

Apollo Twin 9

Finally, there’s now a Quad version, which is certainly no luxury considering the CPU consumption of the latest plug-ins. Even if it’s certainly not the panacea, it will allow you to start using UAD plug-ins more comfortably than with a Duo. UA must find a solution for its DSPs and even upgrade to a newer generation if that’s what it takes. It’s not like we’ve been saying it for several years now… Regarding the converters, the Twin was indeed upgraded and now features the same ones as the Apollo 8, which is very good news, considering the impeccable audio performance of the latter.

Let’s see if this all holds true…!

Benchmark

We set the buffer to the minimum (32 samples) to get the lowest latency possible. We got 1.71ms at the input and 0.63ms at the output (at 96 kHz). That’s just…perfect!

To test the interface, we did some benchmarks with our Audio Precision APx515, and we were able to compare the results with those of the interfaces we have previously tested.

Here are the results we got with line levels:

deviation line

With a deviation of ±0.052 dB, it is slightly below the Apollo 8 (±0.019 dB), but way above the Metric Halo ULN-8 (±0.06 dB), the Apogee Ensemble (±0.087 dB), the Fireface 802 (±0.063 dB), and the SPL Crimson (±0.073 dB). Do note however that the Babyface Pro is a bit better (±0.021 dB), just like the UFX+ (±0.023 dB), the Zen Tour (±0.032 dB), and the Orion Studio (±0.037 dB). But don’t forget that we are talking here about hundredths of a dB across the entire frequency spectrum. Even a bat couldn’t tell the difference in an ABX test!

thd line

When it comes to distortion, it exceeded 0.002% only once at the end of the spectrum. Overall very good results that place the Twin MkII as one of the frontrunners among the interfaces we’ve tested so far.

The preamps provide 65dB of gain and are digitally controlled.

deviation Mic

 

thd mic

With the gain set to 34dB, the deviation remains at the same level, ±0.054dB, which proves that the built-in preamps are pretty transparent. Sweet! Besides, the distortion increases just slightly, 0.003% – very promising, indeed. Regarding the signal-to-noise ratio, we got 106dB, which is quite good. A bit below the Apollo 8 (108dB), but above many others (Apogee Ensemble: 105dB, Zen Studio: 101dB, Fireface 802: 102dB, SPL Crimson: 101dB, Metric Halo ULN-8: 100 dB).

While the overall results are slightly below the Apollo 8, the Twin MkII nevertheless remains among the best audio interfaces we’ve tested so far.

Conclusion

Similarly to the Apollo 8, the Twin MkII didn’t really introduce any jaw-dropping improvements. But that has more to do with the fact that the original product was already excellent rather than with the improvements not being up to par. Just think about the talkback mic, the new converters, the Quad model. And don’t forget the small details such as the mute, mono and dim buttons in the monitoring section. Add to that an exceptional audio performance and Windows/Mac compatibility and you could almost forget that it has only one Thunderbolt port, that’s it’s not bus-powered or that the UAD-2 DSPs are more than eight years old! Anyway, this Apollo Twin easily deserves 4.5 out of 5 stars.

  • Apollo Twin 1
  • Apollo Twin 2
  • Apollo Twin 5
  • Apollo Twin 6
  • Apollo Twin 7
  • Apollo Twin 8
  • Apollo Twin 3
  • Apollo Twin 4
  • Apollo Twin 9
  • latence
  • FCN
  • chain
  • talkback mix
  • talkback cue
  • deviation line
  • thd line
  • deviation Mic
  • thd mic

 

9/10
Shop strengths
  • Everything that you liked from the original Twin (performance, latency, bundle, Unison, mixer…)
  • Built-in talkback mic
  • Finally available in Quad version
  • Additional monitoring functions
Cons
  • Not bus-powered
  • Only one Thunderbolt port
  • Evermore resource-intensive plug-ins and aging DSPs

Would you like to comment this article?

Log in
Become a member
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Audience analysis (Google Analytics)
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising (Google Ads)
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.
Marketing (Meta Pixel)

On our websites, we use the Meta Pixel. The Meta Pixel is a remarketing pixel implemented on our websites that allows us to target you directly via the Meta Network by serving ads to visitors of our websites when they visit the social networks Facebook and Instagram. The meta pixel are code snippets which are able to identify your browser type via the browser ID - the individual fingerprint of your browser - and to recognise that you have visited our websites and what exactly you have looked at on our websites. When you visit our websites, the pixel establishes a direct connection to Meta's servers. Meta is able to identify you by your browser ID, as this is linked to other data about you stored by Meta on your Facebook or Instagram user account. Meta then delivers individualised ads from us on Facebook or on Instagram that are tailored to your needs.

We ourselves are not in a position to identify you personally via the meta pixel, as apart from your browser ID no other data is stored with us via the pixel.

For more information about the Meta Pixel, the details of data processing via this service and Meta's privacy policy, please visit Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Facebook and Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Instagram.

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.


We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Audience analysis (Google Analytics)

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising (Google Ads)

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

Marketing (Meta Pixel)

On our websites, we use the Meta Pixel. The Meta Pixel is a remarketing pixel implemented on our websites that allows us to target you directly via the Meta Network by serving ads to visitors of our websites when they visit the social networks Facebook and Instagram. The meta pixel are code snippets which are able to identify your browser type via the browser ID - the individual fingerprint of your browser - and to recognise that you have visited our websites and what exactly you have looked at on our websites. When you visit our websites, the pixel establishes a direct connection to Meta's servers. Meta is able to identify you by your browser ID, as this is linked to other data about you stored by Meta on your Facebook or Instagram user account. Meta then delivers individualised ads from us on Facebook or on Instagram that are tailored to your needs.

We ourselves are not in a position to identify you personally via the meta pixel, as apart from your browser ID no other data is stored with us via the pixel.

For more information about the Meta Pixel, the details of data processing via this service and Meta's privacy policy, please visit Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Facebook and Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Instagram.

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.