All user reviews for the Marshall DSL401

The Marshall DSL401 is a 4 x EL-84, 4 x 12AX7-powererd 1 x 12 combo amp that "officially" has two channels but really functions as a three-channel amp. The DSL401 has a clean channel and an overdrive channel. The DSL401 is rated at 40 watts and has a single 12" Marshall-designed 50-watt speaker specially designed to complement the DSL401. The Clean channel controls are simple: Gain, and the standard Bass, Middle, Treble controls. The Overdrive channel has the same controls and adds a channel master volume to allow you to better match the volume between channels when switching between channels. Then, there is an overall Master amp control section that consists of a Master volume, a Master reverb, and a Mix knob for the desired amount of effects coming from the effects loop. As noted there is an effects loop on the back with send and return controls. The FX loop is parallel, hence the Master FX control on the front. There is also a 1/4" speaker jack to connect an external speaker cabinet and there is a switch to choose between 8 and 16 ohms load. Even better, there is another 1/4" jack that is an emulated line out for going direct to a console or for recording, and in my opinion the Marshall emulated line out isn't half-bad. Other rear panel features include the mains input, fuse holders, and the 1/4" jack for the included 2-button foot switch that allows you to switch between the clean and overdrive channels, and switch between Overdrive 1 and Overdrive 2. The DSL401 is compact in stature and leads to a more compact, punchy feel, more than enough to play small-to-mid-sized venues, and larger venues either mic'ed up or with an extension cabinet. Overall, a great grab-and-go solution for when you have to have "that" Marshall sound.

I wish it had one more speaker output and a 4-ohm selection, but suppose that would be pushing it. If you need that much sound you should probably step up to the DSL50 head and 1/2 stack.

UTILIZATION

The operation of the amp is simple enough. There aren't so many controls as to make the amp difficult to use. The overdrive channel has two modes: OD1 and OD2. OD2 acts as a boost to OD1 and adds a good amount of gain to the mix, 20db to be exact, perfect for harder rock/metal or fluid leads.

In true Marshall fashion, cranking up the gain on the "clean" channel and pushing the global Master gets you that Marshall power tube saturation that just growls for days. It is conceivable that depending on the type of music you play you could crank up the gain and master and control everything via your volume knob. Beyond that, you have a myriad of tones available in this amp and are all easily accessible. The manual is downloadable from the MarshallAmps.com web site but I really doubt you'll need it. This is an amp that sounds amazing right out of the box.

SOUNDS

I mostly play Neal Moser and George Riszanyi custom guitars with a smattering of Ibanez and others thrown in for good measure. If you're looking for a truly classic rock 'n roll sound, plug in a Les Paul and let 'er rip. You won't be disappointed. Personally, I'm a HUGE fan of what I call the EL84 "grease" that comes with the overdrive channels. I haven't really heard a bad note come out of this amp, no matter what I plug into it. Even at extreme settings the amp never gets too much bass or treble--almost like they put in controls to prevent people from self-destructing. Make no mistake, though, you can take this amp from a small club gig, plug it into a 4 x 12, and play the 'bowl.

OVERALL OPINION

Before the new DSL 40-watt combo launched I did a comparison between the two Marshall 40-watt combos: the DSL401 and the HAZE 40. They're two completely different amps. The reason the DSL401 is more expensive with seemingly less functionality is because it's a true Dual Super Lead amp. This is not a boiled-down version or any type of compromise. This is a bona fide Made in England Marshall DSL Valve amplifier. The DSL401 is a no-frills rock machine but can handle any type of music. Roll back the gain on the clean channel and you've got yourself an awesome Jazz amp. If there's a type of music you can't do with this amp I'd be interested to hear about it. I don't know if Marshall is exporting the DSL401 to the States anymore, so this may become a collectible amp as well--I know I haven't seen it's little brother, the DSL201 in some time so keep your eyes open, and if you're looking for a versatile Marshall platform, the DSL401 is hard to beat.

I've heard and read about others having thermal issues with the DSL401 but I've never had ANY issues whatsoever with my DSL401. I guess the message here is that your mileage may vary, but I've never had any issues and although I can say that I would gig it without a backup the truth is I never gig without a backup rig. However, I can't buy into the claims of issues with this amp because I've not experienced any of them. If you can get your hands on one, and you're a "Marshall" player, I'd get one without hesitation.

Been playing in a punk band for quite some time now

paid $1600 in adelaide, south australia

i love the sound it makes, other reviews of this unit note how dirty the OD2 channel is and thats why i like this amp. OD1 is good for some darker tones and the clean channel sounds sweet accourding to anybody who plays it.

after 2 - 3 years of on off flat out jamming the amp started cutting in and out. i got it repaired new valves, that did not solve the problem. it was as tho the unit did not have a constant power supply. over a month of backwards and forwards getting repaired a broken fuse holder, How the hell does that break.

ok i beleive it could be better, having the valves hanging cant be the best thing, when transporting it makes a fair few disturbing noises, dunno how fuse holder packs up??

i love it except for its fault, being my first quality valve amp if thought it would be constructed a little better.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

I got this off reidys.com for £388 because I wanted some good built in distortion in my amp...

I like the sturdyness of this and the way you can have loads of different distortions and clean tones. I play punk/emo which it is good for however its good for pretty much anything.

I dont like the fact its only 40 watts and that the palm muting sounds weak in the full on distortion mode but i'm getting a 1936 marshall cabinet for it and probably a boss gt-6 to back up the distortion.

This thing seems very sturdy I mean I havent properly tested it but I trust Matt Bellamy in that marshall are built like a brick and Ive seen him stand on the 1960 cabinet and still play through it and im sure they're all built to pretty much the same standard.

I would suggest getting this but if you have any extra cash maybe get the dsl50 head as its not too much more and you can get a smaller cabinet for £200

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

Purchased in 1999 for $550 new in a local shop. This was my first full tube amp. This amp is loud and has the signature Marshall sound however is ridden with quality flaws. See below for details.

That Marshall roar. It's distinct. Go for a dsl head though.

Known quality problems.

Some of this amp's flaws are due to design, some due to workmanship. For example let's start with the design flaws. This amp gets hot. Very hot. So hot you can warm up left-overs by placing them on the amp. Because it gets so hot this model has earned a reputation for solder joint cracks. Tube placement on the PCB is the cause of this. Another design flaw is the bias prongs are located directly on the PCB meaning you have to fight casing fit and tolex to get to it and then it's still a pain with a digital manometer. The best tubes I've found that will bias are svoltecs (forgive my spelling). Groove tubes will never bias right and with full twist will still be very cold. Ready for the workmanship flaws? I've typed enough so I'll just mention the spring reverb is barely screwed in to the casing and should have longer screws. And the footswitch has a faulty cable that will break VERY easily.

This is an amp that should've been more in quality. It was rushed to the masses. Before purchasing I highly suggest either saving for a dsl head/cabinet or going elsewhere. Just too many times this amp's let me down. Since you're reading this you're obviously online so do yourself a favor and search the amp reviews with sense.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

I bought this unit in Canberra, Australia with my own hard-earned cash. I bought it because when tested it possessed the right tones and power that I needed. The cost was AU$1,750.

Great when working. Keeps up with the drums no worry. Good 3-independent channels.

After ONLY 2 months of using (not even that regularly) and sitting in the same place all that time, it died. It powered up but no sound!! I even had it fixed(?) and after 2 weeks without it, I got it back and surprise, surprise, it still didn't work!! I doubt the guys who were supposed to check it even touched it. NOT HAPPY!!

One word: Crap! Actually 2 words: REALLY CRAP!

BEWARE!! Don't buy unless you can't live without it. And this isn't the first time I've heard stuff going wrong with Marshall products (esp amps). I'm switching to Mesa Boogie.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

I purchased this amp in December 2000 from Reno's music for $600 USD. I had an old Kustom solid state 130W head and 412 cabinet, but it was getting on in years and started to hum (probably a large cap failing). I was never able to get a good distortion sound out of it, and so I went after an all tube amp that I could try without investing a huge amount of money, in case I didn't get the sound I wanted.

I like the full tube sound, both clean and distortion channels are good. When running through my powered mixer witht the DI line out, I can really make it as big as I want. I have two 15" black widow wedge monitors that give this amp a huge bottom end, and I can use the mixer to adjust the highs through the crossover. It's like having any size amp you need for any gig. If you haven't used the DI, be sure to do so at some point. It's easier than using a close mic, and avoids the clutter.

I have had to have this unit serviced twice now for heat related cold solder joints caused by the lack of good ventilation to let the heat out of the chassis. I also have discovered that the additional spring can on the first preamp tube places an extreme amount of upward pressure and traps addtional heat on this tube which will cause it to go microphonic or decay after about an hour of heavy playing. This is most noticeable when I switch back to clean, the sound surges from thin and brittle to full and smooth, then back to thin and brittle. I removed the can to see if this will go away, and so far it has helped, but some tweaking of the controls is needed to get back some of the mid punch. This can also places a lot of pressure on the IC board that the tube socket is attached to. The spring could be about one third it's size and still work. I am considering installing both a fan and a top grill like the big heads have, to let the heat out. Probably will wait until the warranty runs out to make this mod, will use a remote fan until then.

Overall, the construction is acceptable and it's easy to tote around to gigs. I believe the speaker is a little thin, a greenback would probably give it a nicer edge, especially when running OD2 for heavy metal songs. I think Marshall should have done a better job of anticipating heat related issues and made better ventilation arrangements to the cabinet or chassis. The chassis is open at the top, so to put a vent in the top of the cabinet would have helped, but then dust and moisture intrusion has to be monitored (no brews on top of the amp!) I'm not big on using my amp as a drink holder anyway, it warms the beer to quick!

Overall, I think this is a great amp for it's price and size. I have a Marshall MG30FX backup practice amp, but I prefer the all tube sound. I've tried a lot of amplifiers and processors, but ultimately "I hear dead people" in those things! I can literally hear the processor doing it's thing and it's like listening to someone on a digital cell phone, it's real close but it's not the natural voice of analog cell signal.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

I paid roughly 800 dollars for it and beleive me it is not worth the money.

The clean channel is allright, not the best one I've heard but it's rather cool sounding for practicing at home.



However, when it comes to the dist channel, you might as well plug your guitar into a dishwasher and get a cleaner sound.
The lead channel of the amp is so dirty and distorted that you actually can't hear the notes on the first 2 strings of the guitar.
So if you wanna play good Van Halen tapping solos and so forth you're better off playing witout this amp. To be candid, it sounds like a crapy garage practice amp and I can't beleive Marshall issued such a bad amp. I now bought a 30Th anniversary combo for only 400 USD and beleive me this is the best amp in the world.

The amp looks good.

If you wanna use it as a practice amp gp for it (if you have 800 USD itching in your pocket) but if you're a real guitarist throw it away or use it as a chair in the bathroom.

You guys are welcome to contact me if you have questions or thoughts about the amp.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

Ebay purchase about a year ago.

It gets a good approximation of the classic marshall sound in a light, one-handed format that my original 1967 plexi half stack can't keep up with. No one I know brings a half-stack to little gigs any more, so the tiny combo is convenient.

It is cheaply built and not entirely reliable. Particle board construction and hard plastic feet that crack and fall off when bumped. Internally I have had the amp serviced several times for little things that broke or shook loose, which is a shame for the high line model of such a famous name amp as marshall.

I have never had a problem wiht the tubes or the reverb tank, but loose wiring on input jack was annoying, and one plastic foot has already broken off despite very careful use. All the feet are still on my 1967 Marshall and my 1963 Vox, so what's the excuse? Particle board cabinet and cheesy circuit board construction are too bad.

The sund is right but the reliability is low and the price is high for the poor construction techniques employed on an otherwise wonderful amp.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

I recently bought this Marshall combo after being dissapointed by the sound of a Line 6 AX2, there’s just no replacing an all tube amplifier, I don’t care how “close” they claim they can get to tube sound with their fancy solid state/ digital algorhthyms, it just doesn’t sound right...period. End of story. I‘d rather have one 40 watt, all tube, one 12“ speaker combo amp, than a full stack with a solid state 100 watt amp.


It sounds buttery smooth, I tried Mesa Boogie stuff, nice gear, but too much crap to mess with to get a good sound, geez, all those knobs are totally unnecessary.

The only thing I don’t like about this amp is that it runs kind of hot, and would benefit from a fan mounted in the back to cool the valves.

construction is solid on this amp, no complaints.

The Fender I tried(Hotrod Deville) just didn’t have enough distortion, and the jack was loose.

Mesa? ehhh, too expensive and too hard to dial in.



You‘ve got to try this amp out, you’ll love it.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

I purchased the DSL 401 from Guitar Center for $600.00 (it was the floor model). I was originally looking for a Marshall AVT amp, I wanted to compare the sound of the AVT to a real tube amp before getting it. I tried the DSL and never looked back.

This amp is one of the best sounding amps i've tried. The EL84 tubes really give the amp a kind of Vox/Marhsall hybrid sound. I get a nice chimey crunch from the OD1 setting.

The OD2 setting is pretty crazy. I play a strat with Duncan Hot Rails in the bridge, and the amp just screams. I don't think that OD2 is as versatile as the OD1 channel, but it gives a nice punk sound.

The clean channel is what seperates the JCM 2000's from the other Marshall amps. The clean channel very full, and can break up nicely with the gain turned up (this amp has an independant gain knob for the clean setting).

This amp gets pretty hot. I used the play with the master volume turned to about 2 for bedroom playing, but i've recently turned each channel volume down, and the master volume all the way up. This seems to cool the amp down quite a bit, and I can still set the volume to a level that I like.

Many people have had problems with the DSL 401's. I don't know what it is, but I've had mine for a year and it still works as good as when I bought it.

3 channels: Clean, OD1, OD2.

Clean is very good for a Marshall.
OD1 puts out an awesome rock tone.
OD2 gives me a full on punk sound.

A pretty basic amp, but I think that's a good thing. I'd rather not spend the time spinning a hundred dials around trying to get a good sound. This amp sounds good at any setting. I'm mainly a bedroom player, but I've cranked the amp for a couple of garage jams. I can drown out the drummer using any channel, so I think it's loud enough for most people.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

The Marshall DSL 401 is a 40 watt 1x12 combo version of the famed DSL head that is available in 50 or 100 watt models. It features two channels, a clean and a drive. The drive channel has two modes, OD1 which is more of a vintage voiced tone a-la the more classic Marshall amps, and OD2 which is more compressed and modern sounding. Each channel has its own EQ controls, and it's capped off with reverb, an effects loop with a mix control, and an overall master volume control. It is loaded with a single Celestion speaker and has the typical black and gold cosmetics throughout.

UTILIZATION

This amp is surprisingly difficult to dial in, to say the least. It seemed like no matter what I did to try and improve it, it just didn't have a tone that worked for my ears. The EQ is nearly useless and only serves to add brightness and make the tone harsher. The gain structure on this amp is downright awful as well. All it does is add obscene amounts of compressed buzziness as the controls are turned up and I found myself simply shaking my head at how awful the controls were on this amp. They serve only as very narrow adjustment and fail to make this amp sound good at all...

SOUNDS

This amp really has three core sounds available, none of which are particularly pleasing to the ear. There's a brittle and sharp clean tone with razorblade highs and no midrange to speak of whatsoever. It also breaks up way too early for my liking and sounds very unnatural. The crunch tones are weak and anemic. There is no solid punch factor behind the tone, just a very thin and underpowered attempt at the traditional Marshall sound. The low end is nonexistent, and the highs tear your eardrums off at band volumes. The OD2 mode is so compressed and gainy that it's almost useless. It sounds like a buzzier and more compressed/gainy version of OD1. Due to the single "12 speaker the tones are very one dimensional and sound anything but Marshally.

OVERALL OPINION

I really don't like this amp, simple as that. They're unreliable, have a cheap set of parts, don't sound good at all regardless of how the amp is set, and are obscenely overpriced. They simply aren't even worth a look... there are so many better amps out there that make this seem like a $1500 doorstop. Don't bother, seriously.

CHARACTERISTICS see comments Lonewolf
4 lamps in EL84 amp (12W I think they are in fact, what makes us 48W, but I could be wrong!)
4 lamps prampli.

UTILIZATION

This is my 3rd Marshall, I have never read a manual.
The sound is "Marshall" regardless of the position.
Note that this is a TRUE qual: rglages put the treble, middle and bass 0 and there is no sound (or so), it is not too hard r but even Gler qd.

SOUNDS

I put my Les Paul in and the magic opre.
I dj a smile from ear to ear when I press the "Standby".
It is certainly not an amp "mtal". Has to take a Valvestate AVT or (if the words of Marshall LoneWolf you want written on it).

But for the rest (not trs techno ...), not notice it's madness.

OVERALL OPINION

So my 3 Marshall.
A JCM800 100W bcp too powerful
1 Mesa Boogie Caliber 50 + 50W more powerful, though jou but what's also ...
1 Marshall Valvestate 100W double body (I had to be drunk to buy that crap)
1 Marshall DSL401, which made me + that rconcilier with Marshall, but also with my guitar.
I love Led Zep, Aerosmith, Black Desir ... This is exactly what sound!

J'tais fan of saturates, I just fell madly in love with my channel "Clean", which let's face it, crunch as bte when tickled. J'tais buff pedals, I have a wah and talk box.
Free, free at last with the best sound ever (MESA quique the silent frankly good too.)
In short, I just rpar an injustice we can not put 4 / 10 a Marshall lamp!
For mtal is OK but no one else is glove.
I play funky on the clean, turning the 3mm rglage Bass, I sound exactment Black Ds (last album: lost, the place upside down).
Once I us the three positions and those of my scrapes clean channel, crunch channel is attacked (the real). Angus, Slash, Perry, Page they are all home now.
Lead is the crunch boost of 20dB (I think vrifier) ​​and is the only point where I will not 10/10 because it is not in Full Control (3 true channel).
The Reverb is not denied either, but hey I never touch the knob (except qd my daughter comes with me DCON).
If I change this amp one day, this will be for a TSL601.

40 amp w all lights
An HP 12 "celestion
8 lamps: 4 in which a preamp in a cylinder, 4 el 84 for the amp.
Reverb (on mine she walked in)
2 channel with a double:
Knob-clean with gain, equalization
OD1 and OD2, with volume, gain, equalization
Master volume, fx loop (effects loop), tuning the reverb.
Possibility to set external baffle extension.

Otherwise a good place to Marshall, the lamps are being protected.

UTILIZATION

Simple rules, manuals simple but useless.

I could not get a good distortion with some setting gives a clean sound, but always more boring and without rel.
For cleans cons are obtained by a sound rock, jazz, crunchy blues easily, but I find it no more.

Note that the equalization is effective clean trs in distortion should be dropped.

SOUNDS

The clean sounds are not bad but it sounds a little dry with accoutumence must add effects, and I find that the amp or worse (mostly distos I try to add (num America and analog). Domage my reverb silent cass

By distortion, I found it dirty, greasy and slimy in exs gain, and too flat and characters DO 2, and 1 OD is the same thing in less strong (l 'od 2 adds 20db, that's all the same a little disappointing!)

OVERALL OPINION

I purchase, jou 2 months with and I sold recement to buy a Peavey Classic 30 nine this time, cheaper and better now TElement

Unless we find a sound that only this amp gives (rock sound with crunch), which is not my case it's not an amp phnomenal. For a little cheaper, better now need a good hybrid transistor / lamps, and for that price, there is much better now.

That says it all

UTILIZATION

Everything is told

SOUNDS

And even when I dcus by this amp

I tried it in his cabin. and 2 things, the marshall c, c tt lamps

the sound of the clean channel, I find how to say EXCELLENT, c marshall really the best sound I've heard (with essay on Vigier Excalibur Special TEXAS SRV) the clear sounds great, not too toufus actually not too marshall mm pretty clean overall, if you put the gain of this channel has BOTTOM, c how to tell REAL CLAQUE this amp.

he village as a bassman, t I surprised her. bold and bluesy well with low hum. c excellent. it looks like a head set jmp thoroughly, it makes its effect

cons by very saturated over the canal, I have not found the dyamique and ambition contributed to the channel clear
The crunch is bland and the EQ is not used really.
especially the medium, from 0 to 4 = useless
but typical c marshall (on my head problem JMP1 mm)
and saturated sounds good rock not metal, but to lead c c rap or not the mesa engl. too typ enough prcis

the volume on this channel is used sparingly, otherwise the sound is not really horible like the Valvestate with a kind of fuzz to overdrive reaches 10. c not good and it does not give a sound quality I find

against the gain by 6 and volume 4 gives good results

what's missing most of the c amp a presence. and above, it really Merd

OVERALL OPINION

Overall I think the amp is not worth the price of 900 euros. mm if you like marshall

I'm looking for a marshall to have a good saturation, c-been not that I would buy the c on.

the +, the channel clear
the - the channel eq of saturated and this one

this version is made for are bright / crunchy not only for saturated. c marshall a kind of hybrid between the renewal of its clear and pass the lead

40W RMS attention to the ears especially the neighbors in the apartment ...
For connectivity, so good (only minus the lack of the headphone jack).

UTILIZATION

Nothing to say, easy adjustment and sound Marshall is the appointment, by the way I am even surprised at the clear sound, exellent.

SOUNDS

Various tests with several Gratt:
- Ibanez: killing in my opinion, what it spits out.
- Gibson: essential with this amp.
- TV: exellent.
- Godin: it goes, nothing more.

OVERALL OPINION

Use for 2 years, I do not regret that choice.
Quite the contrary.

All lamp!
Pramp 4 12AX7 and 4 EL84 power not to tear the ears.
40W total
2 channels (bright / saturated with a boost on a saturated legalization channel
master volume and reverb effects loop +

UTILIZATION

The rglages are easy and fast it was a good sound.
For cons, the quality of manufacture Marshall leaves DSIR (the knobs are as fragile as glass), so watch for Ironbreaker!
And then the components are gnral fool quality: a fuse that blew the fuse because of false contacts, a diode bridge that grid after 2 years of use trs reasonable one leg capacitor pte due to vibration during transport by car (trs fault finding and more fun)
must be handy if ...

SOUNDS

Still, the sound is excellent and that's only because I keep it after all these stories, I almost ...
The saturation is perfect ... What's the marshall
on the other hand, the reverb is really no good but it's not for

Edit of 25/04/2006:
Well, I notice that I tempra parat too positive over time (and knowledge of other hardware).
The saturation is correct without more, the lamps are original quality of chapters I had in exchange for EH pramp, much more attention to dynamics and especially lamps microphone power: we must believe that marshall does not grow still testing select lamps as far as a (fund, a buzzer and a serious blow if a lamp is microphone, do the test in Maasin before buying under penalty of big d exception use in muscle, finally pushing what).
In short, a whole range of lamp just to see how the lights amliorent sound from a transistor (the Valvestate for example).

OVERALL OPINION

Apart from small failures that make you mad that comes down not find what stuck, it's a great amp to play hard and have no sound.
bought new 600, even when it's a great deal.

Edit of 25/04/2006:
600, was worth no more than nine!

Well I'm not going to repeat the technical details of the bte ... others have done and srement much better than me.

UTILIZATION

Simpler you die!

SOUNDS

So the total happiness.

I plug my Lag Roxanne standard:
- Its clear warm sound not entirely clear. a little background, but what the crunch. well snapping ... great for blues. playing with the gain we get really get a great palette,
- Overdrive 1: for beautiful rhythmic much fat,
- Overdrive 2: od which is 20 db and l. ... you fly away! the sound of Garry Moore. foot total.

OVERALL OPINION

Bought two days ago and tried the same evening at a monstrous beef at the bar of square MCON www.squarebar.net (http://www.squarebar.net) I adopted the bte in a jiffy.

40W dlivrent the Sound and should not hsiter sollicit the craft. I recommend this amp to anyone looking for sound rock, blues, hard rock. I do not agree that sr styles rclamant a precision Swiss ... but for fans of the type AC / DC, Gary Moore and his ilk ... let's rock!

40W Tube Combo (4XECC83 preamp, power 4XEL84 +), three channels, clean, OD1 and OD2 (OD1 20 dB, a spring reverb, a master volume (super convenient to not break down your walls when you play in an apartment ... ) and set the effects loop. Well, basically everything has been said before me ...
I'm not 10/10 principle ...

UTILIZATION

- The config and the handling is super simple;
- I mainly play rock, hard rock and heavy 80's, well, there's no picture, sound is there, right there! in addition, good surprise for me is clearly the clean channel (no pun intended ...), which is crappy I find quite convincing, with colors and curves heated through and crisp (!!), perfect for picking on the folk ballads and blues. Note that in pushing out the gain of the clean channel you get a really nice crunch to play rock in the 70's Creedence and company ...
- The clean equalization are effective, they are slightly less OD1 or OD2 in the channel, even if the range of settings, expanded more than respectable with practice (it's been a week since I ...)

SOUNDS

- It is perfect for my style of music and my expectations (I had tried the fender hotrod deluxe ben ... and it's not for me, j'men suspected as much but hey, Ok the clean channel is nice, but I found it too dry, especially the crunch channel is almost non-existent ... even with a good pedal ...)
- I play it with a Yamaha AES 620, with its original pickups (Seymour Duncan SH4 JB in the bridge and a micro Yamaha Alnico 5 in the handle), I intend to change the neck pickup to a SD SH2 Jazz, while the Marshall I find it really less rough than before (must say that I have abandoned my old Park 10 W I started ... yeah, I know ...)
- As said before, sounds (between the clean channel and two OD) cover well the range I was looking for ... and even more so is the clean sound a little dirty (even if you can get clear sound "clean" ) to the bluesy, up to the right of families to large distortion of the heavy (even with the metal or metallica deftones). And with a pedal and an EQ in my opinion it should not have to push to be able to bcp the large metal ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a week and that's the ball!

I love everything about him!

Quality / price ratio, € 850 buy in stores with nine two-year warranty, well it's very expensive qd, for sure ... but hey, I really regret not my investment, and I must say I am more more surprised by the opinions I have read on the forums ...

I would do this choice, this combo is perfect for my needs and my tastes, because anyway, it's still a matter of taste, and must try before you buy!

Edit 11/06: after three months of intensive use, confirmed opinion, excellent, versatile, clear sound amazing, top saturation, it is a pleasure to play this combo, I took a liking to the guitar since I, and I became much more demanding with my game ..!!!

Musical greetings.

40W all-tube amp
everything is there, qualisation spare, master volume, reverb, effects loop, exit 8 or 16 ohms.
However, I regret the absence of a knob "volume" on the clean channel, I use the "gain" for a good rgler but would have been better.

UTILIZATION

Operation is very simple, it's a Marshall (this is my 3rd brand I begin to know)
is heated, it enlve stand by and live sound!
the manual is dispensable as always ..

SOUNDS

Just as good at pricipale:
this amp is really comfortable ds most playing styles, from jazz to hot grandpa hard rock (mtal?) ffrn the small son.
Clean Channel: I t is the most surprised! possd with a JTM30 rput to have the best clean Marshall, I expected a clean sound but a little goes everywhere. well I'm grossly mistaken with my Telecaster sound is warm and soft and desire, we augment Lorqui gain crunch it right! some do not love me! in bridge it keeps a good momentum for Rhythmic and handle is simply sublime in a small blues or jazz!

Overdrive channel
OD1: the crunch par excellence, we find the typical Marshall sound with my Tele I can play black or DSIR gnral rock on that channel with my LP (or other double-scratch ) then it is in its legendary AC / DC, with the gain on the bottom is nearly in the heavy and with half it's perfect for the vintage blues as it should!
OD2: principalmente I use this channel for solos, neck pickup is found in the wonderful solos of Guns'n'Roses! Low load (too?), This channel provides more dynamic and probably surprise you to use THE FIRST, adpote! In rhythmic cuts I recommend the low and add trebble to have more precision if the sound is embedded in some serious trs Submitted.

EDIT: I just bought a small boost electro-harmonix (lpb-1) and engaged with the boost on the clean channel, it has a sound between clean and crunh quite sublime is gnial for ZZ Top in the palm mute (the barn ^ ^), it's great with my tele. same with the boost in distortion, the neck pickup solos are a dconcertante ease and can attack the real solos Black Sabbath, AC / DC or Led Zeppelin. Finally, the OD1 was a powerful but tjr prcis which can switch qques riffs from Van Halen or Led Zeppelin.
I recommend this type of pedals on this amp, I redcouvert it since I Acquisition (thank you Frediani).

OVERALL OPINION

I love everything about this amp, its versatility and legendary grain (I did not have anything to marshall 3). This is the kind of amp that one child care and research gear will be more Dornava on guitars as the DSL401 Ragit much to the sound of guitars diffrent, either simple ( especially for clean and rock), double or humbeckers (for saturation dynamics and furious)
purchase of nine OCCAZ because Marshall is a big bnf (1000euros seen in France!) if I had nine ct I will sell to the same as a 700.800 ENGL thunder .
I can not wait to have my Gibson to be able to operate more in doubles.