View other reviews for this product:
beastylif
Published on 04/03/06 at 01:58
The t have enough CHARACTERISTICS mentioned below ... right?
It's all light ...
UTILIZATION
For my part, I bought it in perfect state (like new), but used all the same. So I did not notice. Ingnieur not need to be, is a branch and sounds! Sounds Marshall anyway ... The two effects loops mritent we dig a little deeper to the head, but no problemo ...
For cons, I keep some restraint with the settings "contour" for now ... I think inconclusive To be frank, I do not prs no diffrence in the game ... By comparison, I had an old two bodies Marshall Valvestate 100 W 8100, and it felt ... But I have not had the opportunity to "open the floodgates" in terms of volume for now, I reckon it's li ...
So in any Reserved.
Other than that: 3 volumes, 3 EQ etc ... is really excellent. all configurations are possible, and we get what some people say a true versatility.
The Big BMOL just a fragile potentiomtres it seems! Mine is in customer service. The OD1 and OD2 2 volumes lach me. It seems that the quality of the components is questionable. I remain convinced that Marshall would not be the case if c'tait ... Assent consumer would fall ... And ever as clean t mine when I bought it I do not know how the Previous Owner 'was used.
SOUNDS
I play a Gibson Les Paul, and frankly sounds a really strong ... I play the Rock together, and really does!
I heard everything on this amp and this brand gnral! Like "not for its clear," "worst all-tube Marshall SERIES" I was even told that the production had nothing do with an old JCM 800 ... etc. Ben I say: Connect, Play, Listen ... and we shall adopt the "one says." Everyone will make his ide but MRIT that it costs the clear sound. It's bright, and slammed both round, it's Ok with a Les Paul, but I assure you that the sound is really l. ..
CRUNCH for the Canal, it's Marshall, and we will dj far enough in overdrive, from blues to rock.
LEAD for the Canal, the slap ben ... C no mesa, the Correct ... but it is not only one bought it eh?
For my part, I play a lot with my CRY BABY, and I find myself really.
In a résumé and growth rings, the harmonics emerge and precision is the same with the background gain is still prcis!
OVERALL OPINION
In rsum I do not regret my purchase really not, it sounds really my taste. But I like the sound Marshall have always been.
The BMOL potentiomtre rviser I am not my decision, my Valvestate is 13 and it still works perfectly! I would never not yet the mark in question.
Even if some "was no longer the era of the JCM 800 ... etc ..."
We knew dj ... thank you! Besides, it is not called such!
It's all light ...
UTILIZATION
For my part, I bought it in perfect state (like new), but used all the same. So I did not notice. Ingnieur not need to be, is a branch and sounds! Sounds Marshall anyway ... The two effects loops mritent we dig a little deeper to the head, but no problemo ...
For cons, I keep some restraint with the settings "contour" for now ... I think inconclusive To be frank, I do not prs no diffrence in the game ... By comparison, I had an old two bodies Marshall Valvestate 100 W 8100, and it felt ... But I have not had the opportunity to "open the floodgates" in terms of volume for now, I reckon it's li ...
So in any Reserved. Other than that: 3 volumes, 3 EQ etc ... is really excellent. all configurations are possible, and we get what some people say a true versatility.
The Big BMOL just a fragile potentiomtres it seems! Mine is in customer service. The OD1 and OD2 2 volumes lach me. It seems that the quality of the components is questionable. I remain convinced that Marshall would not be the case if c'tait ... Assent consumer would fall ... And ever as clean t mine when I bought it I do not know how the Previous Owner 'was used.
SOUNDS
I play a Gibson Les Paul, and frankly sounds a really strong ... I play the Rock together, and really does!
I heard everything on this amp and this brand gnral! Like "not for its clear," "worst all-tube Marshall SERIES" I was even told that the production had nothing do with an old JCM 800 ... etc. Ben I say: Connect, Play, Listen ... and we shall adopt the "one says." Everyone will make his ide but MRIT that it costs the clear sound. It's bright, and slammed both round, it's Ok with a Les Paul, but I assure you that the sound is really l. ..
CRUNCH for the Canal, it's Marshall, and we will dj far enough in overdrive, from blues to rock.
LEAD for the Canal, the slap ben ... C no mesa, the Correct ... but it is not only one bought it eh?
For my part, I play a lot with my CRY BABY, and I find myself really.
In a résumé and growth rings, the harmonics emerge and precision is the same with the background gain is still prcis!
OVERALL OPINION
In rsum I do not regret my purchase really not, it sounds really my taste. But I like the sound Marshall have always been.
The BMOL potentiomtre rviser I am not my decision, my Valvestate is 13 and it still works perfectly! I would never not yet the mark in question.
Even if some "was no longer the era of the JCM 800 ... etc ..."
We knew dj ... thank you! Besides, it is not called such!