All user reviews for the Neumann TLM 103

Ja'i the Achte 1 year ago it is coupled with a preamp TLaudio 5051, and still I cross that there is nothing to 1000euro better off as a condenser microphone for studio diafragme before the j'utilisee c414uls AKG, and even if it is not niqment cardiod, the sound of the TLM103 is becuop warmer is precise, plain detailes, the only thing is that we must play with the EGULATION for a more natural because there are too many to le5K if not ..... EST has the micro meiller 1000reuro

OVERALL OPINION

Ja'i the Achte 1 year ago it is coupled with a preamp TLaudio 5051, and still I cross that there is nothing to 1000euro better off as a condenser microphone for studio diafragme before the j'utilisee c414uls AKG, and even if it is not niqment cardiod, the sound of the TLM103 is becuop warmer is precise, plain detailes, the only thing is that we must play with the EGULATION for a more natural because there are too many to le5K if not ..... EST has the micro meiller 1000reuro

TLM103
Static Microphone for All!

OVERALL OPINION

TLM103. Finally a microphone edge whose sentence is final ... He and the geule! Bravo! Finally, a Neumann microphone that makes you who you are with a signature discrte but not fooling anyone ... For a price that is less likely to cause fcheuses situations, see even cause many divorces ... Use a pre amp with a Class A, provided with tubes Telefunkun Diamond ... Why not? A sweet and old amps brand pr Quad, Quad II or an old McIntosh? For their musicality ... ... completely silent and Hop!
While the comparison with a U87 trsdlicate become, of all the membrane fawn you it is not the same?? Well yes! Everything else just about talent (for once ...) & pr amplification.

T says it all

OVERALL OPINION

I was looking for a good static and the era I test a few hours.
I recorded a few takes ... then I did the same with a low-end micro Tbone SC450 (100 euros).
I t trsdcu the TLM103, in the sense that the diffrence from my Tbone n'tait Vrau not gross! away from l. .. Sectra refund the silent sound of the same Tbone ... Obviously the better ... but of justifying the price diffrence ... I do not think!

Since I have tried on occasion then finds a U87 ... and b. .. l a worth it! see anything!

Frankly ... A person who seeks a good mic, I would recommend to SAVE a little more (I pay the U87 Euro 1500) ... if not ... look at the cot instead of mid-range microphones to report quality prices much more interesting than the TLM103!
Precision: the comparisons with the same t RALIS pramplis (a p'tit BLUETUBE and a Universal Audio)

Neumann is not given ... but LTo me, it really pays too the brand!

See below, it shows dj prcis
1) that the capsule of U87 is indeed fabulous
2) it is not everything in a micro

OVERALL OPINION

- 5 years
- The quality in recording the vicinity a small bump due
- No, only a few microphones of well, the press is sold pasncessairement brands. Since I tried lamps AKG, Electro-Voice, Brauner, Beyerdynamic and it seems that, apart from AKG, the performance is well gnralement Fidler to cot; Ricardo Music West had about a Groove Tubes ... Nice try!
- Excellent qualitprix because that achieving this certainty has a cot, so it is adequate (if it were only a microphone for singing, it would plutt "good")
- Yes

The silent mode, 3-4 years ago, the TLM103 dnigrer the grounds that this mic excels in the voice speaks and would be less able to singing hardcore.
In my opinion, this opinion is not ngatif honnte trs, it is excellent for voice talking is one thing, but ingnieur sound will tell you that the famous "greenhouse proximity does not fit all situations, and is 'irraliste' in some cases (cinma, etc.).. dpend All types of voice and accompaniment (both "Transformerless" must Obviously well be round to give a valid rsultat). But as his owners know, there is trs good for strings and wind instruments, so versatile, and up the akm ( Obviously, then saturate it, but you have plenty of room before reaching this stage). Still, he should not compare the lines out of proportion.
But for this kind of petty or small hostile [qu'videmment because, in part lgitime fear is that it ensures the lowest common dnominateur and therefore takes all more than proportionally with cong Nres (but they are REALLY trs below, except that I did not test the GA or Heil)], the ingnieurs sound chip included in the "minimum list "a studio. Duly noted. Obviously if you have the option of a U87 acqurir ... this is not comparable. If you have found an original and reliable microphone that outperforms, you do not like the blow Pigon.

Condenser microphone large-diaphragm, more particularly suitable for singing.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 1 year already
Appreciated features: the price, "true" pro microphone. Too bad the suspension is so expensive.
Compared to big brother U87, or the TLM 193, the 103 sounds a bit tight, lacks precision and clarity, it requires a good equalizer to make good sound. So the logical "price" is met, the TLM103 sounds worse compared to others, but it is also cheaper. I'd say it's a microphone in the entry level range (although the price may seem high). But if you really want a more precise mic, I recommend waiting a little longer and buy a TLM193 (possibly second hand), which is a one class (price) higher.

Condenser microphone transformater output.
Capsule of U87 (LA studio reference).
Single cardioid directivity
No general mitigating
No high-pass filter
No supension original livery
Excellent sensitivity
(For more information see the test Audiofanzine)

OVERALL OPINION

I use this mic for about a year mainly for making voice together with a tube amp ART TUBE.
What strikes me first is the big sound obtained immediately without correction. Grain and a great mid-bass presence effect without distortion, like a large magnifying glass over the sound.
No overflow in the treble, the vocals are always very well mastered.
It is the quality offered to Pro Home Studios.
The unique Directivity Cadio not too troublesome for working in a Home Studio.
Pop filter needed.
For use in a room large enough (12 M2 mini cab abstain)
This is the best condenser microphone, or electret that I have never used for singing (I always use or have used the Audio Technica 4033, RODE NT2, AKG C535 EB).

I do not understand how can Neumann can sell this excellent microphone without its suspension (there are elastically effective and inexpensive suspensions, see one of NT2)

The protection box is beautiful but wooden hinges and lock closure are a little cheap. A suitcase-type flight case might have been preferable.

The value is good considering the quality of the gear ...

(Originally written by Hagbard/translated from Audiofanzine FR)


1) The U87 capsule is fabulous

2) the capsule is not the only parameter for the sound of a mic

OVERALL OPINION

- Five years

- Quality of the proximity effect

I also tested a tube AKG, Electro-voice, and Brauner and the sound generally corresponds to the price (except for the AKG) .

- Excellent value for money. Quality has a price and it is fully justified.

- Yes

Three or four years ago it was very trendy to criticize the TLM103 with the argument that it was great for speech but not for vocals.

But that's not true. It depends on the voice and the accompaniment (it's a transformerless mic so you need other good components to get a good result). But the mic is also very good with wind and string instruments so it's quite versatile. Don't even try to compare it with products in other price ranges.

Top sound engineers include it in their must-have list when it comes to equipping a new a recording studio. See Steve Pogact's online article: Build a studio?.

I've used the Neumann TLM103 strictly in the studio on everything from vocals to banjo to acoustic guitar. It is great for any and all applications that you would typically use a large diaphragm condenser mic for. The only thing I wasn't happy about was that with the regular model (not the Anniversary edition) I had to purchase a separate shockmount; however, the clip that comes with the mic works fine as well if you don't care about having a shockmount for it.

OVERALL OPINION

I've had the TLM103 about a year and a half and I have had nothing but good times with it. It's got such a clear and crisp sound. I've used a ton of different Neumann mics (U87, U67, etc) and although this isn't as great as those classic mics, it definitely holds its own. A friend of mine did a shootout between this mic and the U87 and said he really couldn't see much of a different, except of course for the $2000 extra the U87 will run you. Although it may be a bit pricey for a small studio setting, if you are looking for a real quality mic, this is about the cheapest you can get from a company who makes the best mics on earth. I wouldn't trade this mic for any other in its price range.