Gibson Les Paul Studio
Gibson Les Paul Studio

Les Paul Studio, LP-Shaped Guitar from Gibson in the Les Paul series.

Price engine
Classified Ads
  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews for the Gibson Les Paul Studio

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.2( 4.2/5 based on 76 reviews )
 32 reviews42 %
 32 reviews42 %
 4 reviews5 %
 3 reviews4 %
 3 reviews4 %

Clemad's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
Mahogany body
Maple Table 2 rooms
490R and 498T pickups
For me finish excellent but not perfect


Channel 59 rounded, less than 50 large and thicker than a 60, it suits me perfectly.
Set in a luthier, perfect response to the handle trussrod.
Action flush frets, I had the pot with the handle: 1.8 mm - 1.5 mm at the 12th fret, even without any frisette emphasizing a few (10-46 shooting).


Haaa ... These microphones are great! More versatile than burstbuckers, they keep the "fat" and Gibson can still fetching big distos while maintaining a sound set.
Endless sustain!


Excellent model, which is not always the case with current studio.
It was actually reduced from the previous series, which, compared to the support, absolutely does not sound (slightly hollow body has a place) ... Moreover, I like it well, less back pain in sight.
A word of advice: try before buying, this one was in the store and remember the bad models are rarely sent for exhibition (avoid the net ...).

barsthebest's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
-1 coat: Maple
-2couche: Mahogany

Channel (derrire):
-Wood: Mahogany
-Profile: '59 Les Paul Rounded
- "": 111/16 "
Local-junction of the handle: 16

Neck (front):
-Wood: Rosewood, Ebony on Classic / Alpine Wht
-Width: 243 / 4 "
-Frets: 22
-Inlays: Pearloid trapezoid (trapze)

-Color: Gold
-Pice: Stopbar
-Bridge: Tune-o-matic
-Plaque: Black Speed
-Mechanics: Green Key

Micro-neck: 490R Alnico magnet humbucker
-Bridge pickup: 498T Alnico magnet humbucker
-Controls: 2 Volume, 2 Tone, 3 position Potentiomtre

-Strings of origin: Brite Wires .010 -. 046

-Interior: White Plush (white)
-Exterior: Black Reptile Pattern Hardshell
-Logo: Silver 'Gibson United States' logo
=> For more info, see the official website of Gibson ...


The handle is enjoyable, the same color as the body. It is a little larger than the other guitars (fender strato, Squier ...). The bend is easier to do with my other guitar (Yamaha Pacifica 112), one can make aisment three semitones.
CHAC is relatively easy to acute (not perfect but already well-trs).
This gives a good sound trs! Just SOON grant, the solos are easier to do than on my Yamaha. Agreements Sotres property, as Artificial harmonics (the conduct of the screw at the neck pickup with the doight). In short perfect or if it was not the weight a tad heavy (very acceptable for a les paul), and handle a tad too big.


It offers good sound but the TRS agreements kinds lens too if you play with a lot of shaking. I use a Marshall MG30DFX, a Vox 30 watt and 30 watt fender. The guitar comes trs property suits the style of tous.Elle Rock, Pop, Heavy-Metal (finally acceptable), Country (yes!), And Jazz.


I use it for two weeks, and I'm thrilled! I love this mixture of white black and gold. Prmire the time I received his check, she silent beautiful! I clean the microphone every time you play APRS, PSK it dirty quickly, and I always range in his chest. In short she has a good qualitprix (about 1200 on thomann), it has a nice look and sound good, so perfect apartment and handle the weight (see use). I suggest for those / who want buy and eSite.

fsmbesnard's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
The "Studio", which appeared in 1983, resembles a modern version of the LP allge finish, its colors, its lack of binding (nets) ...
Note that recalls the Custom configuration: Micros 490 R / T 498, mahogany body, maple neck, black plates.

** Peculiarities of my 1991 model **
Painting: white has yellowed (original it was to be a "classic white")
dorbr fittings /> Mcaniques oil bath (avoid other, type "deluxe" I think they take less tuning!)
Repres trapzoidaux (Standard Type - in the 80s had premires simple points)
Key bne (!)


I have to have a good millsime, in view of other messages ...
The handle is nickel, well-sized frets, mcaniques oil bath ...
A guy I play with has a wine red 96, her mcaniques with plastic eyelets take less tuning.
I find the 2 copies I know irrprochables a comfort point of view!
I solved the problem of the weight (5 kg) by investing in a onreuse strap and thick quilted since happiness.
The varnish should not be terrible, it aragi rubber of my guitar stand (turns pink fawn locates back, contact area) or "toupee" of the tui ( the head, behind the saddle, also turns pink, without contact with the support) ...


Rather I play blues / classic rock, in short, this guitar suits me.
I plugged into a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe 112. This couple offers good clean sounds, otherwise I overcomes the screaming distortion Fender with a Boss MT-2.


Bought in August 2004 for OCCAZ 1100. Almost the price of a new day ... I do not know if the current Studio is of great quality as all manufacturers there are ups and downs ...
I do not notice, the better it is of course a try!

Pucelle_Dabidjan's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
Objective approach:

Les Paul guitar shape amricaine
Cherry red lacquer
Mahogany body
Table in Saddle
Mahogany collbr /> Rosewood
Price 1,300 euros
Subjective approach

The guitar is INTERESTED see. Plutt pretty far, it is less Russian approach. Sanding and finishing of the frets, coating can be improved if not flawed.

Big manquo at the painting on the cloth that dteint microfibre when rubbed. A bit like the transparent varnish was applied on the paint does not allow time for this dernire Scher.

(2) Not spectacular in this price range, it makes a serious default does not forgive.


The handle is plutt enjoyable if we ignore the crimp. Include a comprehensive ergonomics standard Les Paul with the default inhrents and ask to be accepted by the consumer.

Plutt sensual touch is generally potentiomtres and 2 of volume and tone are practical Defines its sound.

The guitar has a tendency to brand dsacorder trs. Harmonics n'taient not RULES. The bridge n'tait not prpar and has eaten two sets of strings trs shortly.


The guitar sounds good. In the registry clean you get a nice clear that TRS can be used as references. Crunches are fleshy and deep. I would put a little distortion on the BMOL hard-I too Whereas torture of del 8 / 10 potentiomtre of the race.

(8) trs good guitar sound in terms


1365 euros for you ...

the problem endlessly.

The sound quality is certainly good and the quality of a violin indniables. But these points do not allow this instrument dcoller the final grade. The problem relates above are unacceptable. Expect an after-sales service imbued with that believes itself to know everything and you reoit amabilis with a troop of CRS a G8 summit and you get a rsultat frustrating.

I can not imagine the young man who goes to work all the t to pay for this thing.

(1) Not advisable
No mp for this test. Thank you!

Complment, 7.11.2007:
I saw this guitar is sometimes sold in Switzerland opportunity for around 390 euros. At this price, it's a bargain, but only that price. Do not buy it for more than 500 euros.

bibi44's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
Everything has been said. except that the handle is detestable .la finish is not worthy of GIBSON !!!


Coarse handle the barrettes transcend and you scratch your fingers!
this guitar acute lack!
Good ergonomics .good sound.


Not this guitar arrives quickly has limitations .with a marshall it sounds very bold rather well


I have it gard a year but I have not liked this gibson .j have bought a Epiphone Les Paul Custom
2 SD SH1 and SH4 pickups and c is the top !!!!!
Yes I have had lots of other guitars and I never repeat a studio!
GIBSON c is fucked in the world with this guitar.

okapie76's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
handmade in the United States
Mahogany body with carved maple table
Mahogany (profile 59) with rosewood (22 squares)
Scale 24 3 / 4 "
Cordier Stopbar
490R and 498T pickups 2
2 volume, 2 tone, 3-position selector micro
Chrome hardware
Fintion Ebony

Purchased 1995
Mechanical changed after 5 years


I use it now for over 12 years. stage, studio, ...
jai done everything with style, from blues to metal ...
just deadly. the guitar of my dreams of a kid ...
malgret grain gibson blues, we can all play with the scraper.
Perhaps a little heavy for the back end to Longtai ...^^


A very particular sound cheap gibson has a mivro blues (neck) that any hard and clear (bridge) very effective especially in saturation ^ ^.
with the two together, its a clean c dazzling jazz.
a very good power and incredible sustain despite the advanced age of my guitar ...
I used men for blues song, typical US, jazz and old heavy ...
magical record ...


For me the best that exists after scratching the standard model, of course ... but before a US fender ...
can be expensive but just a jewel, its a myth in the history of music ... a collector's item ...
I may be biased, I LOVE the Gibson Les Paul ...

JustADream's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
Gibson Les Paul Studio made in United States
22 frets
2 humbucker pickups, 2 volume knobs, 2 tone
3 positions (micro acute, severe and both)
Set neck.
Violin in C style format with arched body
Metal parts (pickups, bridge) are golden


Level game is fantastic, I love thin and tall frets. No one else got as much satisfaction on this point. It's easy to play blues and rock phrasing or more are easily shredder. Against access by the sharp point is not strong.

The neck is very thick, so it remains to see if it suits you. Personally I think we get used to it very well, the hand is in position callee blues. Position in jazz that is not annoying for my taste. Basically when moving from one guitar to handle an end to this one it's a shock. But in the end you get used to. Try it anyway because it is part of the factors to consider when buying.

The guitar is well known, is heavy. It is not a problem while sitting biensur (even if less comfortable than a Start), but better off standing a thick strap.

Indeed on this point I would note that the straps must be avoided with regular tips in leather. These are deformed and the metal fittings designed to attach said strap are too small to hold the strap.

My guitar and fell heavily twice and given the weight, it has done harm. Thus provide a strap that snaps and the problem is solved.

The C-shape is also easily fall when the guitar laying back on an amp. Always ask the front (or better put in Cases, Hard preferred).

Note also that there is a little weak in the head, because of the different falls of mine broke twice to this place. In short it is an instrument that requires the utmost care. Unfortunately I have never been so damaged that a guitar there and it's enough to want it. At the same time it's the one I used most and blows directly into it due to its weight and low ceilings of the garages which were repeated at the time.


On this point there is so much to say that I would add just need to try it.

The sound is truly sublime. I played several guitars but I keep coming back to this one. As it is a good strat a rare and versatility suitable for many styles: blues, jazz, rock, hard, metal, etc..

Quite simply, with any amp it sounds. The sustain is huge and the heat generated single notes.

Micro Acute distortion, mind-blowing that is accurate, the palm muting style heavy metal sounds of hell.

The neck pickup gives a clear sound that I love personally. Satus the leads are fabulous at this position.

Only the intermediate position that I never use.

If you know one ringing guitar, it will reward you well. As against the contrary I have already try this with people who scratch, did not say a staggering level, and the sound was absolutely awful, to believe that the instrument was not the same.


This guitar I bought end 95 in Luxembourg, I was just 15 years. I had a cheap guitar before and since this instrumenet fascinated me, I wanted to move to the higher category. Upon entering the store I came across this Les Paul and I have wanted to let go. Which had a good time to pass the vendor (who farted not a word of French or Luxembourg for that matter).

And I have never regretted that choice, even years after. I got it for 800 € at the time. The price / quality ratio was therefore no question then.

The only thing I regret is not having been able to take enough care (due to points mentioned above).

It is also to me the most beautiful instrument in the world.

Basically a love story that lasts for more than 10 years.

Artsurf's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
Well, apart from the mechanical to shit, I also have a tone that crachouille a bit.


Guitar heavy and unbalanced; When you play standing up, the body is down and head back, so that you end up with the guitar at an angle, giving a unique style. Channel super nice. I love it!


It all depends on the amp. But I think this guitar is very versatile. I use a Tonelab, and depending on the amp selected, I can do a funk rhythm, arpeggios cool, devastating distortion, jazzy atmosphere. Perfect. Unless you want the sound SRV, Hendrix ...


Apart from the weight and mechanical, it is great. I love it.

Studiocreuse's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
Gibson made in United States
gibson round handle 490 and 498 micro
2 volumes and 2 tones
handle collbr /> mcaniques of m. .. e to prices


Channel enjoyable trs
ACCS at no acute (large bead)
curiously lightweight compared to my Gibson Sonex Deluxe prcedente
very good sound gibson


Style rock, round
I have more bite with the microphones of the Sonex deluxe velvet
Yet dating from 1985


Tres studio version of this because if the sound is lbr /> for the price we MRIT much better in terms of quality finishing
I just received the guitar this week I sincerely think I have it back
for another model
I find it very average mcaniques that are more toys than real
mcaniques guitars. By comparison I bought a satriani js1000 last month
and I do not regret it at all (cheaper and 1000 times better)
I will aim for the les paul deluxe or something like that
les paul studio finished niet =

ebrian's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Gibson Les Paul Studio
See more MYTHICAL avis.GUITARE Beautiful violin.


Channel too big and round my got.Aigus trs accessibles.Guitare lourde.Trs good sound, but the characters for the versatility trs limite.Faite ROCK !!!!!


Trs good sounds for rock, blues.Micros chaleureux.Mais do not look for clean sounds ...


I tried several US MODELS Asie.Il and get used to the weight and do not forget that the design of this guitar dates back to 50. However it is a price Gibson, then a zero price relative quality of a brand that benefits from its notorit.Vous can be as well or better for much cheaper.