Become a member
Become a member

or
Continue with Google
Log in
Log in

or
Log in using a Google account
learning
3 comments

Louder Doesn't Mean Better

The Loudness War - Part 3
Share this article

In this installment, we'll look at the consequences of the loudness war on music, sound and human ears.

View other articles in this series...

In the previous article I pointed you to a visual example: On the one hand you have the graphical representation of the 1985 hit song “Ladies & Gentlemen, Grace Jones (Slave To The Rhythm)” by Grace Jones and produced by one of the great producers of the time, Trevor Horn. As its name implies, it was a dance hit that was featured in every club back then (and which, given it’s dancing nature, didn’t need to be overcompressed).

On the other hand, you have a hit from today, “Crank It Up” by David Guetta, featuring Akon on vocals.

This type of graphical representation allows you to gather different information of a waveform: In the horizontal axis is the time and on the vertical one is the volume or amplitude. On the Grace Jones track, the finer lines spiking up and down represent so-called attack transients, peaks, impulses, etc. which correspond to percussive and brief sounds that have a lot of attack. The light blue clusters correspond to mean volume levels. To be more precise, they correspond to the Root Mean Square or RMS level (defined as the square root of the mean of the squares of a sample, got it?), which is commonly used to measure electric current or voltage. 

Let’s take a quick look at one of the most serious issues when it comes to measuring audio, namely the representation of perceived volume or loudness. The VU or Volume Unit meter, conceived in 1939 and standardized in the USA in 1942, is one of the first attempts to visualize RMS and perceived volume. A VU-meter can actually measure a sine wave precisely, but not so a complex wave. RMS values, very often found in digital audio, are sometimes considered an approximation to perceived volume, but none of these two measures can represent loudness precisely because the latter is a subjective measure. Noted mastering engineer Bob Katz put it succinctly in this quote from Gearslutz in April 2006: "RMS is just a guide, a VERY rough guide of loudness.

Let’s get back now to the sounds, the peaks. Remember that very brief, percussive sounds contain almost all frequencies. Test it yourself: Take some white noise and apply to it a very short envelope. Here’s a progressive example (with compensation for the loss in volume): 

00:0000:00

Now let’s go back to the images: On Guetta’s track, it’s hard to identify any transients and the RMS volume shows a rather disturbing regularity.

Finally, if you want to talk about hard data, the Grace Jones track has a dynamic range of 17 dB, while David Guetta’s is only 3dB. That difference shows the consequences of the loudness war, in a nutshell. In today’s music market, in order for mixes to compete in terms of loudness, they have to be compressed so heavily that they lose much of their dynamic range.

Perceived volume, measured volume, WTF?

One of the things that causes most confusion, apart from the notion of compression (see the previous article), is the decibel or dB. I’ll try to limit the use of this relative (and logarithmic!) measure to the bare minimum in this article. It is relative because it has to be expressed in relation to another value. This means you can’t talk of two dBs in absolute terms, you need to say what the dBs you are talking about are related to (unlike with two inches, which is something anybody can easily relate to). Moreover, there are as many dBs as things you can measure (dBu, dBW, dB SPL, dBm, dBV, etc.).

You can measure electrical levels and sound pressure levels precisely, but it’s almost impossible to define the sensation of loudness in an exact way (how can you measure “it’s twice as loud or four times as loud”?).

The latest standards (like the EBU-R128) are based on this subjective idea. Nonsense? No, because as soon as you accept the existence of a standard, it is valid for everybody and provides a basis for comparison.

For now simply keep in mind that, in digital audio, you use dB FS (decibel full scale) and dB FSTP (True Peak). These are measures of the greatest possible or admissible value. You can’t exceed them. We’ll see later what the difference is between them.

Simplified measure of the dynamic range

With the intention of bringing together professionals (and not so) against the Loudness War, the Dynamic Range website has gathered information, downloads, and lots of other info on the subject. Together with two software developers, it provides the TT DR Offline Meter for download. A very useful tool that allows you to measure the dynamic range of your favorite albums and songs. You can find it under the Links menu of this site, which also provides a list of albums that have been analyzed with this tool.

It’s very easy to use, you simply need to drag the file or folder of the album (make sure to remove any weird punctuation marks or accents and use only 16 bit, 44.1 kHz) into the upper part of the software. It will then calculate the highest peak (dB FSTP, which explains why the display sometimes indicates “Overs”), as well as a mean value of the 20 loudest RMS values in an histogram made up of 10,000 measures taken every three seconds (with a precision of 0.01 dB). The result of the subtraction (RMS – peak) determines the DR (Dynamic Range).

Even if there are newer standards, this type of measurement remains relevant and retains the idea of comparison. In any case, you ears ought to be the ones to guide you.

Bring the house down?

IMPORTANT NOTE: It is not recommended to use headphones to listen to the audio clips in this and upcoming articles! 

Loudness War

Before we continue, let’s do a simple test: First, listen to an excerpt of the Grace Jones track. Set up your system (remember not to use headphones!) in a way that you can hear this excerpt at a volume loud enough for you to feel the punch of the song, without cranking the volume all the way up. The EQ ought to be flat.

00:0000:00

Next, cover your ears and listen to the following David Guetta excerpt without touching anything. If you are brave enough, take your hands off your ears for five seconds, but not more than that 

00:0000:00

Now, go and try to solve the newly created conflict with your neighbors and then come back to read the next installment.

Download the AIFF files (in a ZIP)

← Previous article in this series:
Compression in the Volume Wars
Next article in this series:
Understanding your Ears →
  • angelie 350 posts
    angelie
    AFfluent Poster
    Posted on 05/02/2015 at 23:56:44
    This is such a problem... Nobody want it, but everybody is doing it because they will never score a hit record and only because people think it has been mixed bad/soft.

    My little girl hates the modern music. She covers her ears and ask me to turn it of.
    She has very sensitive hearing.

    She loves the old school music, classical music and folk. Those are just the music types with a lot of variation of punch and volume.

    There are so many post of the loudness wars. Available on the net. It is time we stop this madness and start to learn mixing all over again so we can enjoy music again and stop over loading our ears with volume and brain with crap.....

    - Angelie

    To bad the most tutorial site just do the opposite thing.. :@
  • Screaming Match Prod 9 posts
    Screaming Match Prod
    New AFfiliate
    Posted on 05/03/2015 at 12:19:18
    Quote:
    Nobody want it, but everybody is doing it because they will never score a hit record and only because people think it has been mixed bad/soft.


    Guess what miss ? You nailed it :bravo:

    To be honest 1 minute, nobody gives a sh.. about loudness war. Let's be honest with ourselves... Except a few audiophiles (I really hate that term, it means nothing to me), who cares ?
    Just a few people are aware of this obviously, but it touches only a very small microcosm. Lambda listener expresses exactly what you mentioned above. "This song doesn't sound really loud. Well, I guess it won't be a good hit."
    That's all. Pretty simple.

    Btw, I don't think it's a good idea to compare a song from 1985 and another from 2015. 20 years of techniques have passed since. It's like comparing carrots and bananas... just sayin'


    But don't get me wrong. I don't say it's a good thing, all the contrary. Like you did with your daughter (and that's certainly why she can't stand actual music & you can be proud of this :bravo:), I try to educate people against the bad sides of this volume race.
    Some of them understand completely and do agree, some don't. That's the way it is.

    2 days ago, I had a quick conversation with a friend I sent a master of his track.
    Him : It's loud mate.
    Me : In a bad way ?
    Him : Yes, a little bit...
    Me : Great ! I'm sorry, I did it also for the others and thought it wasn't loud enough but I will go back to the first and I send it to you right now.

    So yes, it happens and it pleased me. For info, the first master reached -10db RMS and the second one I sent reached -12db. You can see that I'm faaar from nowadays releases.


    On the other hand, have a quick look to a recent release and read the comments :

    https://soundcloud.com/celldweller/metropolitan-zardonic-remix



    Quick info about it :
    mini_672231MetropolitanRMSLevel.png



    Does people know how to read these infos and do they really care ? Answer is no.
    So, instead of complaining on different forums like I see all around since a moment because it seems to be fashionable to rebel, try to educate people all around us because they won't come here to read this kind of topic.

    Even if I saw Ian Shepherd's article about loudness on different papers, I don't know if people really take attention of it. Nonetheless, it deserves to exist and it's a good starting point.
    Now, let's see what happens with YouTube's normalization... I spend a lot of time on it and I can say that 95% of the songs don't have the same level. Moreover on platforms like Soundcloud.
  • Ledger Note 4 posts
    Ledger Note
    New AFfiliate
    Posted on 05/07/2015 at 17:42:34
    I love dynamics, but I also dislike some of the more modern records who are standing up against the loudness wars. It's like they are overcompensating and trying to force dynamics, which ends up getting too loud and too quiet. It'd be fantastic if I was sitting in a comfortable chair in a great listening environment, but it's horrible with earphones in the gym or in the car. There has to be some middle ground.

Would you like to comment this article?

Log in
Become a member
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.