View other reviews for this product:
phenix!
Published on 06/01/07 at 09:06
Micro scne static (and possibly studio)
Power fantme 9 52 volts.
Super cardioid
Bandwidth: 50Hz 16kHz (but on the diagram the curve seems s'tendre 20Khz frequency drives)
80Hz low cut switch, rduction 12dB per octave, rather effective.
240g
EDIT June 1: An effect of greater proximity and a Shure Beta87 rude, but nanmoins trsgrable playing with the distance from the micro.Cet effect is even less when that typ 'with a dynamic micro Manir gnrale.
OVERALL OPINION
I ordered at the same time as the beta 85 of the same brand curiosities never been static micro scne.
Well I was 49 euros for enjoyable surprise! I want to believe it n not happen at his home Shure MODEL (more expensive), but with this micro vritablement I found a grain, a heat prsence, an r serve and gain momentum! I've never had a micro-type ... just dynamic.
What is a static ... inconvnients the benefits without it - say a great sensitivity (and ca repisse not more than my SM58 yet!) For maximum dynamic range (the microphone singing scne which has the largest reserve of gain that I tried.
Forcment without transcending my littralement BETA 85 (but a little more even when my SM58), the 78 gives me vritablement BETA another sound and color original, while a carefully compltant Park microphones priori suit me really well as a singer, for the same models and scne studio waiting for something better. So versatile enough.
EDIT 24/11: I Live test condition yesterday in a bar-concert (with the small stuff: table and sound LEM + Line 6's sound card which I use as pramp '
and its quality were then vritablement rvles! His reserve of gain, dynamics (the voice starts easily forward), its depth, heat, and this soup just! The BETA78 really showcased the singer's voice unadorned, a v ritable feeling scne studio!
As for the problem of feedback evokes in the forum, meaning j'me currently not concern. I have had no problems despite 3 returns a small scne with an acoustic correct but not optimistic either.
With singer comparlors we balance this with a micro MB85BETA of the same brand and a "real" SM58 (hollow, dull, not sharp, comprim.Nous tions unanimous! Outperformed the static while the dynamic point of view.
In short, for me and my singer is a vritable plbiscite! I therefore maintain my note!
Dsormais, I do not recommend it more ... At this price LJE think it would be a shame to spend more than cot if, like me, you use that dynamiques.ACHETEZ LE! In waiting to pay you a static Neumann.Un scne is really something else, believe me!
Edit 11/02/07: I had the opportunity this week to work in a large room (with table Midas Legend 3000, full of racks, and good returns ...) that put us available for the song , BETA58 of a Beta87, 2 akg 535eb SM58 and I have not even released their housse.J 'I had ramen and more Beta78 to compare the beginners ...
to beginners, as I quickly replaced by one of BETA58 T Bone (I do not compare the incomparable)
Compared to "real" Beta87 (C cardioid, hyper cardioid diffrent of A), it is warmer, a little less aggressive in the treble, with a proximity effect much less pronounced.
In short, the original is better but I expected ... and at the same time, not that much, the technicians of the room they even surprised taient rendering.
Nanmoins, T Bone enjoyable surprised me on several points:
Premire, it does not pop much more than the Shure ... the Difference is subtle, less in Live to listen almost imperceptible.
Deuximement the rjection to Feedback, better than the Beta87, even through a good volume, while remaining reasonable (as with the Shure) one of the singers / guitarists in his back while lamp had a Marshall amp with 4x12-inch HP Right. his cot the AKG 535EB, static cardioid (which I eventually used for percussion) is much less sensitive
Finally, during the show, T Bone was not the cot Czech Shure, it sounded really, really behaves like a static, and in this he is dmarque dynamic microphones.
So if you have not at least put in a 150/200 euros mic like this, the T bone is the best compromise it for me.
Personally, I think my next purchase of a micro scne be static, or a Shure Neumann KMS105 Beta87A (when I have sub-sub), in the meantime, the Beta 78 will rev fine.
June 1st EDIT: Here are some excerpts is hard (I do it again the better) with the T bone raliss Beta78, and other microphones such as Shure Beta87A, or Dynamic: Shure SM58, T Beta85 bone among other things, the link is on this thread:
Power fantme 9 52 volts.
Super cardioid
Bandwidth: 50Hz 16kHz (but on the diagram the curve seems s'tendre 20Khz frequency drives)
80Hz low cut switch, rduction 12dB per octave, rather effective.
240g
EDIT June 1: An effect of greater proximity and a Shure Beta87 rude, but nanmoins trsgrable playing with the distance from the micro.Cet effect is even less when that typ 'with a dynamic micro Manir gnrale.
OVERALL OPINION
I ordered at the same time as the beta 85 of the same brand curiosities never been static micro scne.
Well I was 49 euros for enjoyable surprise! I want to believe it n not happen at his home Shure MODEL (more expensive), but with this micro vritablement I found a grain, a heat prsence, an r serve and gain momentum! I've never had a micro-type ... just dynamic.
What is a static ... inconvnients the benefits without it - say a great sensitivity (and ca repisse not more than my SM58 yet!) For maximum dynamic range (the microphone singing scne which has the largest reserve of gain that I tried.
Forcment without transcending my littralement BETA 85 (but a little more even when my SM58), the 78 gives me vritablement BETA another sound and color original, while a carefully compltant Park microphones priori suit me really well as a singer, for the same models and scne studio waiting for something better. So versatile enough.
EDIT 24/11: I Live test condition yesterday in a bar-concert (with the small stuff: table and sound LEM + Line 6's sound card which I use as pramp '
and its quality were then vritablement rvles! His reserve of gain, dynamics (the voice starts easily forward), its depth, heat, and this soup just! The BETA78 really showcased the singer's voice unadorned, a v ritable feeling scne studio! As for the problem of feedback evokes in the forum, meaning j'me currently not concern. I have had no problems despite 3 returns a small scne with an acoustic correct but not optimistic either.
With singer comparlors we balance this with a micro MB85BETA of the same brand and a "real" SM58 (hollow, dull, not sharp, comprim.Nous tions unanimous! Outperformed the static while the dynamic point of view.
In short, for me and my singer is a vritable plbiscite! I therefore maintain my note!
Dsormais, I do not recommend it more ... At this price LJE think it would be a shame to spend more than cot if, like me, you use that dynamiques.ACHETEZ LE! In waiting to pay you a static Neumann.Un scne is really something else, believe me!
Edit 11/02/07: I had the opportunity this week to work in a large room (with table Midas Legend 3000, full of racks, and good returns ...) that put us available for the song , BETA58 of a Beta87, 2 akg 535eb SM58 and I have not even released their housse.J 'I had ramen and more Beta78 to compare the beginners ...
to beginners, as I quickly replaced by one of BETA58 T Bone (I do not compare the incomparable)
Compared to "real" Beta87 (C cardioid, hyper cardioid diffrent of A), it is warmer, a little less aggressive in the treble, with a proximity effect much less pronounced.
In short, the original is better but I expected ... and at the same time, not that much, the technicians of the room they even surprised taient rendering.
Nanmoins, T Bone enjoyable surprised me on several points:
Premire, it does not pop much more than the Shure ... the Difference is subtle, less in Live to listen almost imperceptible.
Deuximement the rjection to Feedback, better than the Beta87, even through a good volume, while remaining reasonable (as with the Shure) one of the singers / guitarists in his back while lamp had a Marshall amp with 4x12-inch HP Right. his cot the AKG 535EB, static cardioid (which I eventually used for percussion) is much less sensitive
Finally, during the show, T Bone was not the cot Czech Shure, it sounded really, really behaves like a static, and in this he is dmarque dynamic microphones.
So if you have not at least put in a 150/200 euros mic like this, the T bone is the best compromise it for me.
Personally, I think my next purchase of a micro scne be static, or a Shure Neumann KMS105 Beta87A (when I have sub-sub), in the meantime, the Beta 78 will rev fine.
June 1st EDIT: Here are some excerpts is hard (I do it again the better) with the T bone raliss Beta78, and other microphones such as Shure Beta87A, or Dynamic: Shure SM58, T Beta85 bone among other things, the link is on this thread: