All user reviews for the Digidesign Pro Tools 7 Le

Installation was not pos specific problems.
No incompatibility MAC (PC that's another story ...).

ADQUATION / PERFORMANCE

I tourn Protools on a Mac equipped with an Intel Core Duo with 2GB RAM.
The software works.
It's long loading unlike other apps (see Acid Pro).
The configuration with Mbox 2 is stable.

NOTICE GLOBAL

I used 4 months, I had enough ...
Why essay? Because everyone swears by Protools ... Why? That's a good question, I have not found the answer ...
MIDI management, I prefer to avoid talking about the same VST (vitons the fcheux subjects).
The effects are good quality still happy for the price we pay. Honestly I do not see any advantage over other apps of the same level (see Cubase).
I confess I do not understand this vritablement mania swear by Protools. Considering the prices pratiqus Digidesign Protools and reputation, I am very trsdus.

What is the interest to work with a hardware / software more expensive than the competition and really better?

Hi All
I am new user to ex ProTools LE 7. I bought it Jan. 7, 2006 (with Digi002 rack) and resold the same 20 months. Nothing wrong at the installation. It plutt easy. Ditto for the hardware configuration gnrale. Surprise at the first launch: the software is in English. A black dot over the doc also in English.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Here is my config: Athlon 2800 + on Asus A7N8X Deluxe motherboard, 1GB of DDR PC3200 and 2 discs UDMA133 7200RPM 8MB of cache.
Protools 7 LE requires large hardware resources. Indeed I Exceeds 60% CPU utilization with 12 audio tracks in reading and 5 plugins in which an insert convolution reverb (Wizoo)! The other 4 taient a comp and a basic EQ Digidesign. I use Nuendo 3 and I can usually record 24 tracks simultaneously and mix as much (or +) with 3 different reverbs (home waves), a comp + insert an EQ on each voice, use of sub-groups with even other effects and I can not reach 20% CPU usage! Digidisign MRIT the sale of the new manner in which PT 7 plugins gre ... no comment
Also I had several errors and crashes due to DAE (digital audio engine).

OVERALL OPINION

I used Pro Tools LE 7 almost 2 weeks to finally come back without hsitation Nuendo 3. In fact, the keyboard shortcuts are super complicated alt + shift + ["] for example and so must all the time going through the menus, the markers are difficult grate + and finally the edition or no programming noon and compared Nuendo. I often work on projects with long recording time (1:30 2 hours) and PT7 the "bounce to disk" which serves a mix multiple tracks to wav file Stereo lasts as logtemps the same time session. With Nuendo 3 for a project of 2 hours, 10 minutes to take the blender file stro.
The price quality ratio is good because even when the audio interface (the digii002) is of very good quality. pramps the 4 are good and it is possible to route the signal easily. However, and this is rather teacher, Digidesign announces 32-track recording and playback or the Digi002 not be liable for only 18 to record (and still a little bricollant with spdif). It is impossible to couple two Digi002 to reach the 32 tracks ... not cool. I for my part rgulirement need 24 tracks simultaneously.
In short in my case, I make a mistake by buying Digi002 and Protools 7 and I ENTSO. This material does not rpond my needs. I will not go that choice in the future. I sold everything and came back from Nuendo 3 with an RME Fireface 800. This is the day and night! DSOL for fans of Protools, but for me this log do nothing more than Nuendo. For the quality of sound, a good mic, good pramp, good converters and is jou whatever the software used.

Hi all, I just invest for the version of Pro Tools LE 7

For installation, no problem, as usual Digidesign, very easy and hassle free.

The manual is in English, as the software, so the bases are necessary but the software is intuitive, so by taking a minimum it's going to the head.

Warning against by some plug-ins also require an upgrade to work

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I have an athlon 64 3200 + on a MSI K8N Neo, 1GB of RAM and two hard drives 7200rpm Sata 150, and an M-Box's first name.

The software eats a max of resources (but not more than 6.9) but given the quality of sound that's understandable, and my config protools runs perfectly, even in the end mix with more than 20 tracks and a lot of plugs, when it is made auxiliary tracks to avoid putting too many plug-in, there's no problem. on the other hand 1GB RAM is required.

The sound quality is impressive, even with a "small" m-box.

It crashes rarely, when the computer is reserved for the zic, even on pc as long as not a whole lot of programs running in the background is nikel.

OVERALL OPINION

I use pro tools for 2 years now, I've always does very pleased.

The upgrade to version 7 is worth it, despite a reorganization of menus that I was a little disturbed at beginners (just take a blow), I am very happy.
The amliorations that struck me most are:
-The instrument tracks, they are much more convenient (no need to create an auxiliary track + one MIDI) and a bunch of small amlioration for MIDI, very practical.
-The Drag and Drop, finally!
-The possibility of grouping of the Regions as tracks
-10 Sends instead of 5
-The possibility to automate all the functions of a plug at a time, I use it rarely but it is super handy when you need it!
-New plugs "Dynamics 3" not bad at all.

So much for me, so it's true that the upgrade is a bit expensive (90) but it's worth, I regret now that I got used to the new features I think are essential ...

The core audio manager is not quite compatible with Intel Macs.

In fact, if you want eg (which is my case) box using your M as its output to play music on your monitor speakers. Some problem of buffer size and include USB.

Let me explain:

- When you open itunes and default audio output is rgl on M box. The core audio manager opens and sometimes playing itunes does not dclenche. It is then necessary to close and reopen two applic. It is a little haphazard.

- Other cases: itunes Get You Started well, reading too many snaps. However, if you try to open any applic, Ifoto eg (very good example). The music sometimes gets blown several times. As if the RAM Buffer ncessaire silent and saturated me DBiT of a USB n'tait not enough. The Manir laplus simple to limit this problem is to increase the buffer size of 512 M M. 1024 attnue the problem but it does not remove not complete.
In résumé, a small bet of the day Core audio manager with a better management of the M 1 box would be welcome.

Install issue, it is aisment. I love this new way of distrib as adopted by Digidesign, more colo. Gone are the large folds that are lost in Mandres carriers. It dsormais internet we reoit the software.
The back up of DMG for Mac is just as well.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Apart from the problem NONC above. Soft turn trs well. It operates perfectly bcanne resources. The row does not plug ... It is a pleasure in power.

OVERALL OPINION

Trs good soft, up to its name ...

Pbs no installation on OSX Tiger
I have not had time to test it on pc
The electronic manual is well detailed. (Almost 800 pages ...)

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Config test: Apple PowerMac G4 Sawtooth + 1.6 Ghz GigaDesign
the software works properly, I have not tested with many tracks (+ 16) and many plug (but it's as good after all soft drinks, the more you put the plug must be more power ... )

the config is very stable home (7.1 latest update digidesign)

OVERALL OPINION

One week of use at the moment
There are the Pro and Anti protools ... I will not reopen the debate.
If I purchased a Mbox WAS to use ProTools.

I am a former user of cubase sx1, and the passage is a protools without much problems.

Simple Installation, fast and clean Windows XP Pro SP2 automatically updated.

Note: PT7 LE positions itself on your hard drive system and invades the other for safety. So if your drive will store the audio is full in the middle of a recording, it will automatically continue on a different disk or other storage media. That's useful when big session.

No conflict, I consulted the list of hardware compatible Certied ProTools Digidesign's website.

The PC is also used for applications CAO/3D without any problems.

The configuration software is simple but is not in 30 seconds. It is necessary to think its use and maximize their choices depending on the type of project that we will most often to treat. In my case, I use almost exclusively the software and features acoustic instruments (bass, guitars, microphones ...).

Digidesign hardware I have is pretty basic:
- Digi 002 Rack
- Command8

The manual and software supplied with the hardware they are well made and fast training DVD is very useful.

Given the power system, the note is maximum.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

FYI, here's the hardware configuration I use:
Intel Pentium D960 / 4GB DDR2 Corsair TwinX Platinum / CM Asus P5WD2-E Premium / disk system WD 250 GB Barracuda SATA and SATA 2 WD Raptors 36GB 10K RPM. The Raptors are exclusively dedicated to the Protools audio in the sessions and WAV + MIDI libraries.

Absolutely no configuration problem, the balance is perfect and stability rarely seen. For those who have a PC meeting the requirements of Digidesign, the switch to Mac is absolutely not justified: soft and hard are perfectly stable.

Regarding performance, I am far from having knelt or to approach the limits of CPU and RAM. It is quite normal tapper in a large computer system if you want to use the power up Protools LE.

I usually have for each track:
- A treatment of dynamic (or Digidesign Bomb Factory)
- 1 EQ 3 or 4 band graphic or parametric
- An effect (chorus ...)
- An effect send

For a couple of audio tracks and instruments together, not a problem.
Note: I usually run with a resolution of 16 or 24 bits at a frequency of 44.1 kHz. It is unnecessary for me to go beyond.

OVERALL OPINION

I spend four hours a day and as much per night for a week.
I am fortunate to be backed up nicely by a sound engineer friend who bump on PT every day.
This is a quick way to learn and grow (by the way I thank him).

The power of the audio editing is legendary and well-deserved, MIDI is as good as Sonar (I used a very long time) without the tortuosity of Cubase or Logic. In this regard, I do not like these programs to a purely logical reason, they do not fit me and I do not doubt that these are excellent apps.

Pros:
- Absolutely fantastic audio processing
- MIDI accessible and simple
- Perfect routing
- Plugins available (and Ignition Pack Nomad Factory)
- The warping of using VST FXPansion Adapter (super efficient and bug-free)
- Plugins VST / AU / RTAS / AS
- The hardware monitor with Rack and Digi002 Command8
- The quality of audio jacks really very pro

Cons:
- The need to carefully consider the use of non real-time AudioSuite
- Colonization by ProTools hard drives (not serious, but in principle)
- The very logic pro, needs to be well studied

For a high-powered software and really pro, you swim in happiness. However we will have to take a little head on the use and not be reluctant to refer to manuals and training videos. This is a production of the most serious that requires real learning. Once considered the logic, you have the total freedom.

Price / quality ratio + Software Digidesign hardware: excellent.
Switch to ProTools is not at all an innocent approach and may lead to some addiction. The great happiness come to the studio with just a DVD backup sessions and an iLok!

Installation is no problem on a G5 bi-pro ... but the PC is another problem! I installed the PC Mbox2 of 4 prs has little equivalent (P4 2 to 3GHz, 2GB RAM) to work only one is stable! Making a real head.
The configuration is without much difficulty, at the same as there is not much to see ... it works or not work.
The manual is clear, but are not familiar Digidesign there a. .. how to say ... to learn a particular language: the language ... a protools shuffled to an English-franais Drout little ...
Even when I put one in the manual that is very useful if you are a regular at other software of its kind whatsoever ... because it must be read to be able to run a minimum in protools.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I go to use it on PC which is only possible if you have exactly the configuration recommended by Digidesign (if not the dictatorship has!) Is I will use a dual-G5 proc 2.8 GHz: the software works well enough, a few crashes from time to time, but I think there are users habits, so one could say that even if a plant is stable. .. and yet I'm only importing or PT6 PT7 sessions in order to convert them into APRS PT5 and import them into my favorite editor http://www.sydec.be and reading sessions the maximum 32 tracks (in any case one can no more!
The performances are those of the G5, so no comment on, missing is a train with a 3500 G5, and too bad what?
Since version 7.1 I have a few crashes at the opening session and PT5 PT6, but must insist eventually walk, and also when I do a 'save session copy in' ... but hey
I'll but a 3 for G5

OVERALL OPINION

I ing his (editor, mixer) in broadcasting for 6 years
I use proutools 4 years in office really basic: opening sessions, backup, small ditions.
What I like most is that you can be the pter saying "I have a studio in proutools" right now the client is listening, and I work with APRS software that really works, in short something pro.
What I like least is proutools. But unfortunately I have no choice, it has become "the" flagship software in my area and I understand why, it's more expensive (in a version with which one can begin to work seriously: HD2 or HD3) in an LE version was working in DV image is an option as that protools is not done the work the picture!
Some will say "yeah but you can do anything with," I would say "yes, everything ... but evil"
So the ratio quality price is zero: a choice between breaking the bank with a proutools LE works poorly, or mortgage his house to a ProTools HD3 Accel thing thing that not work (evidence no major studio in the audiovisual recording over paris a master, or so fingers crossed with a 3324 and running Pyramix act and mix with their film Automation Could I speak not same)
If this were a short again, so I would choose a PT LE because he must remain compatible with the other, until one day the TSA says "arrtez work on ProTools, we just go realize that there is better elsewhere for 10 years, but hey, we not silent sr, Americans use it only for 5 years "Pfff everything has it's lobbing.
When I think that 59.99 for the Germans sell an app that does better than protools http://site.magix.net/french/accueil/
Come on, I put a small zero for the final

Quick and easy, except the ugly and manual in English only. No incompatibility issues (the VST is not compatible, but hey it's not a scam or a bug ...). Configuration is a snap.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I have an AMD Athlon 1.8 (which is about 3 years), with 768 MB RAM (minimum!) And an MBox 2 Mini. I use it with Reason for now, and ca train a little, I must increase my RAM. Otherwise the "hardware-software" is perfectly stable. I have 9ms latency to 128 ... it's good enough for me, but with a better machine I could have better I think.

OVERALL OPINION

I use the PT since I got an MBox 2 Mini, so ago about two weeks. Before I was in Cakewalk Pro Audio 9 ... and of course the difference is incroybale ... but it would with any soft recently. I also have Sonar Home Studio 4, good software, but for about the same price as the PT, the Digidesign wins the round easily.

Pro Tools 7 LE is a little hard to understand (and very ugly manual virtual long) for a beginner, but after two weeks without progress, I'm doing almost perfectly. The interface is simple and convenient, the sound quality is great, the plug-ins are very good. Only the MIDI editing is a bit disappointing. It's crazy to say, but with all these new opportunities (interesting for that matter!), It was difficult to do things that Pro Audio 9 is! But I think with a few days of practice, I could get used to this.

The tracks available are ample for the home studio, I have not yet reached. My only real complaint is the inconsistency with VST and VSTi. Before I get the software, I did not know that inconsistency, and right now, my and my Kompakt Lounge Lizard feel quite alone on my computer! It's not too bad now that there Fxpansion VST to RTAS on, but the good 100 bullets surplus was not expected and is quite annoying.

Otherwise, top, the choice I would do without hesitation, the price / quality ratio is exceptional. I think the phrase that sums it up is this: The Pro Tools version is not an "amateur" an excellent professional sequencer ... is a smaller version. I do not know if you are receiving the difference, but hey, it means that unlike Sonar HS 4, for example, with just over 100E (or dollars at home), you get software in your size, but with power, sound quality and an interface worthy of studio pro.

Good!

Well I'll put the record straight
Pro Tools is not I 7. I have a 6.4
and frankly c the ball especially nivo sound because the sound is really powerful and Tappe ca. The MIDI functions are enough for me because I record everything in real time the flies
and Bomb Factory plug-ins are effective.
After the pro tools stuff pnible c product activation but hey if c frankly a very good product fast effective.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Well I'll put the record straight
Pro Tools is not I 7. I have a 6.4
and frankly c the ball especially nivo sound because the sound is really powerful and Tappe ca. The MIDI functions are enough for me because I record everything in real time the flies
and Bomb Factory plug-ins are effective.
After the pro tools stuff pnible c product activation but hey if c frankly a very good product fast effective.

OVERALL OPINION

Well I'll put the record straight
Pro Tools is not I 7. I have a 6.4
and frankly c the ball especially nivo sound because the sound is really powerful and Tappe ca. The MIDI functions are enough for me because I record everything in real time the flies
and Bomb Factory plug-ins are effective.
After the pro tools stuff pnible c product activation but hey if c frankly a very good product fast effective.

- Installation is it without problem?
4 clicks on a dual proc G5 1.8GHZ, and footstool ...
very simple.

- Have you experienced any incompatibility?
No, pro tools is really a well thought no soft crash, a quick and efficient hard to match.

- The configuration gnrale is easy?
not much to configure for it to turn ...
after to go further by against it must be known. But like all big software, you must understand the logic and learn the tricks.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

- What is the configuration of your computer?
g5 dual pro 1.8, 4g ram

- The software works he correctly on this configuration?
Nothing to say

- What performance?
based on the number of plug ...
for example 50 or 38 Q6 rcomp with 32 tracks and a video in DV, it will run.

- This software + hardware configuration is stable?
never seen a soft turn like that. Open 24/24, 12 not use big day and a lil bug every 3 / 4 months

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
4 years

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
trs expensive and the options for MIDI

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
or yes ... except Pyramix

- How do you report qualitprix?
expensive TDM versions trs
THE affordable versions

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
eyes fermbr />
Pro Tools offers opportunities in almost infinite mix and edit:
keyboard shortcuts, tools, office automation, ergonomics ...
ringing sound, the interfaces are robust and well made (except preamps ...)...

the big positives:
the omf, being able to open its sessions in 90% of the same studio, the precision (tools, calibration, session management via worspace eg, ...)
ergonomics, the keyboard shortcuts (you can almost do without the mouse) and especially stability, it does not crash ever and the little time we encounter a pb with a session (eg wrong file) there are 10,000 ways of recovered.

Low points:
all options (idispensable in many cases) cost a fortune, and omf dvtoolkit2 eg.
plug-ins cost a trs expensive too. (But the best are in RTAS or TDM)
MIDI, ill-conceived.

than that of happiness, I use to work for 4 years (industry) and home (music) I see can do without it now.
I used Cubase, Nuendo .... it has not come their ankle.
there's just logic audio for MIDI which is formidable, but not stable and boring asser with plug-in.

Super laborious installation.
It's worse than a reformat and reinstall Windaz SD (memory recall)

Mac, if you have the latest computer "brand apple begins" top top fashion and fashion is DTC (in your c. ..) for PT work: not yet compatible.

I put one on balance because anyone can do it if you have at least 2 hours ahead.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

After installation, we move the action.

In Contents of issue:
Not bad. it works well, it's not intuitive forcment but once shortcuts return to the head it's effective.

Major weakness is my taste: the southern part of the edition, especially in terms of display.

The mix: it's the mix, the automation etc ... I ca me.

OVERALL OPINION

It'll be 3 months that I use.
This is a good tool but requires patience and some decision-head.

Installation on MacBook Pro Silver 768MB of ram, g4.
problem of USB bus power, requires one of etelechatg spcial drivers on the digidesign site (unless it is a maj firmware?) short after having to install a hack solution that costs the era ja around 700euros, we s'aperoit that phantom power does not work! (Tjs bp of power supply by USB!)
The registration of plug ins to activate them is a real galre

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Macbook pro g4 silver bi 768MB of RAM
Software etemps time to plant
performance zero for MIDI, (that for pa sfait!, good mix (thanks to well-known routing pro tools). But the main advantage of this solution is the image sync and naturally we must pay a DV option for you. is a version normal performance "audio / video" no!

OVERALL OPINION

1 year, after working three years on Pro Tools TDM.
J loves the interface, the console emix and management of the audio signal in the bus. The possibility to continue the project on a pro tools!

I dtest management noon. The acquisition of the DV option is not a good idea because a slowing too much, and even on a mac end xeon 2007; Bond metter of video on a mini window. Features audio medium, except for the mbox pro

On a PC moderately reliable (plonasme) with 256MB of RAM and a samplitude, I could edit and mix uen twenty tracks with sampliutude 48khz, with full screen video on a second screen and plug in many. With logic that is a real software for music, we have the same flexibility in routing pro tools.

The report price is not good quality, software brid CHRE card because "it helps to have pro tools" and a test solution to pass the moon is made of STL;
Pro Tools LE Pro Tools will never be HD (which deserves its cons by reputable)

I will not go that choice, but the magic word "pro tools" reassuring symbol of professionalism, and wanted a partner, it was "small" with the same budget, LOGIC STUDIO 500 euros and has only one audio card I think a firewire allows more bcp in all areas, since the video notement ^ trs open FINAL CUT

Install no problem
Configuration ease

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Dell Inspiron 6000 platinum
has turned impeccable '
is stable, even on a laptop PC

OVERALL OPINION

Good value q / p (compared to a much more expensive cubase)

I purchased to be compatible with HD studio sessions (prparer the job to the house). This is actually not an HD-level performance, but it's not a scoop. Neither better nor worse than another squenceur just another philosophy.

I would do this choice (cheap, I bought 220 euros with an mbox 2 mini, portable history of being on vacation). It's almost mandatory to have pro tools when trying to earn a crots in his (I am not a supporter of Digidesign diktat, but sometimes you have to follow).

I board buy Mbox2 I wanted protools, protools I board had ...
the three dots to the galley was to install! but
FAUS it goes! I think a user on average two
was entitled to its share of crashes in series, error, and company.
Has cooled enough to start, if not frustrating,
after all with all the crap around protools! and all pro
the tralalala, the solution in audio, etc ... outright
we said we would do better now to buy samplitude!!

Briefly, the first day, in contact with protools, it often enrages!
then after you understand a little tour of the site to upgrade
the software required, we move from the basic version to 7.machin is
checks the USB port which is connected Ms. Mbox2 (and yes it
FAUS to be careful, Ms. requires a dedicated port in its own right!
Computer users warned understand a little warning), it also checks a lot of little things that are
explained in the manual (in French am the way, in pdf format) and there! its Tournai (BE says so ...)

short, easily installed plug, we forget the VST, which
is a shame, but after all ... all air stable,
therefore see the use!

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I board up a bike for the occasion, has as its What was planned things so I well done! CoreDuo cpu 3ghz, 4GB RAM, 500MB hard drive, and all tralalala, two nice flat screen 22 "for visual comfort (have room on the display is very important when you have spent hours to sharpen a soft like this!)

Finally I put my eyes on the interface of ProTools, I run a
plug (kontatk3, EZDrummer) I plug my guitar on my ToneLab LE and
mix on my desk ... and finally the Mbox2, I plug the bass, my microphone static short, I switched on the studio! monitoring the output of Mbox2 ok, everything seems ready! we take off!

I send a drum track with presets Ez, nice keyboard
kontakt sheet with three chords that I play in a loop, the first step done! I created a stereo audio track and I configure the inputs IN1 and IN2 to use what comes out of my desk mix, rec j'enclenche then I go into a little groove on bass, same for the guitar, then a friend has played the voice of improv a third runway, I want to set up a fourth in which I add small guitar solo ... Briefly, after the frenzy registration go to mix! then the balance on the plug, it compresses, the EQ, reverb on, it automates levels, one chorus, the flanger, the limit is cut, the glue is off, on ... Briefly, the mix work and honestly we have fun! we add an instance of a solo instrument kontakt history to discover the MIDI editing and ... have fun a little less!! MIDI has never been the strong point in protools, I had heard, I read it everywhere, in short, was no surprise that I am a chouilla disappointed but overall it could be worse, luckily there Findus, my keyboard, it will not edit, we'll play live and edited behind, will be more lively and spontaneous! with my qualitées recognized as a pianist I board successfully aligned three notes of saxophone and worse voilou ... we touch a little, we shall deliver up its fleet because its a little but do it anyway! short, MIDI Editor sufficient to edit a live recording but not to edit GG pretty complex sentences directly in the sequencer, or to my 9, to say that symbolic
I am disappointed but after all was to learn gymnastics

What else, I board already doing a fine novel! place further notice

OVERALL OPINION

I would say that time spent helping the rage of the installation only a few few little crashes disrupt the whole, was otherwise stable, just not bad swing track, more than enough in a home studio, the Sound is really good, the protools (and its companion the Mbox2 in my case) is not a scam small budget, if you want to start using equipment that holds water and then turns pro digidesing signs a interresting offers accessible

not everyone can afford ProTools HD and digidesing understood it and even if this app is not as powerful and flexible than its big brother HD remains a good investment for which the means learn to use it ^ ^

Installation without problem, but thanks to several years exprience with the software, so a little patience, and it works, if your sound card is compatible with the program and your computer: ( see on the site Digidesign compatibility).

When I pass the G4 intel Mac Pro, I had to wait several weeks before the Digi 02 and Pro Tools LE is compatible with intel ... probably damage collatraux of war between Apple and Digidesign ... Again, patience, I did not Verify the compatibility: it is now settled.

The main advantage of Pro Tools LE is its compatibility with Pro Tools HD: you can start a project home and complete it in a studio with HD can be taken in the studio back home HD and making the edit, even if you lose the plugs, and if we limit the number of tracks returned to the once. Simply replace the plugs unavailable on the other of the same type (for editing will do), and disable / reenable the tracks according to his need IMMEDIATE. In my case, Pro Tools multitrack magntophone Whereas a broad offering editing capabilities, appearance Reduces twelve o'clock as the simplest. Note, however, some internal instruments correct, but the edition I am working on twelve o'clock Logic.

Do not expect to find everything you need in a single program: dpend all of your expectations, and the way you work.

I work on Logic for Fast Fashion for MIDI (I need to visualize a partition, and twelve o'clock edition in Logic is really sharp)
I work on Pro Tools 7 LE for audio (my audio files are no problem and forth between Logic & Pro Tools, Logic, except that the files reconnat stro interlacing, while Pro Tools LE 7 CRE 2 audio L & R).
I'm working on final edit for the professional orchestral scores.

The manual is a bit rbarbatif and easily dcourageant who has not the basics. I had the chance to learn intuitively as and, looking over the shoulder of his ings in the studio, I noticed that everyone had a mthode is what makes this software so versatile to use: if you want to get something, it is rare not to find an easy way to get there. I also had the opportunity to record live with a Digi 02 & pramp RME OctaMic: once the levels are calibrated yapuka ... and there was plenty of time to re-work on session later ...

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Intel Mac Pro Mac OS X 10.4.11: 3 GB memory

Caution: Do not overload plugs with: it can quickly be limited: to promote the plugs such as Hall & dlais on the track, and submit tracks by bus to the activity processor SAVE

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using the passage of 6 7, and before I used the 5 ... So all the ten years

The +: display of waveforms, shipping fast and intuitive, editable work area in a click or a keyboard shortcut ...
The -: MIDI but usable limit

In rsum I am satisfied with this program if I did not fail me, for its flexibility edit audio, (and to give a clean mixing session on an HD ing when the budget allows ....)

T ever by the MIDI, I knew where I stood and never intend to do MIDI with, without exception ... Now it seems that Pro Tools LE 8 has made progress in midi ... try